So libs want to help poor South American countries by destroying one of their major industries?
Like it was originally written and stayed until the 50s.What else would we expect from this bunch of heathens. This is the same political party that leaves the words, Under God out of the Pledge Of Allegiance.
No offense but y’all here are old. That’s why you didn’t know who he was. Regardless I was just ribbing @hmt5000 because of this post:Funny how he thinks Tate is some beacon of the right that we all worship or something when in fact the majority of us barely know anything about the guy and could care less about him.
He isn't in custody. He was held for 45 minutes per reports and released due to lack of evidence. I love how leftist believe anything that they want to but no matter how much evidence you give them they won't believe something they don't want to.
'Causes actual violence to trans people' - that is utterly preposterous. Words are not violence. Not calling someone by their preferred pronoun is not an assault, a call to violence or anything else. If some trans individual gets their feelings hurt because someone called it by the 'wrong' pronoun - boo freakin' hoo. You ever watch 'Scrubs' where Dr. Cox called JD by a girl's name all the time? Was that violence? I'm sure in today's world, we couldn't have a show like 'Scrubs' (which was hilarious, btw) because too many 'its' might get their feelings hurt and protest.
Why would he need to ditch Truth Social? why can't he exist on both platforms?
Little more info on the Dem/lib congresswoman's kid......Looks like Democrats are now using their kids as domestic terrorist. We know Jameslee approves!
Now apply to religion.'Causes actual violence to trans people' - that is utterly preposterous. Words are not violence. Not calling someone by their preferred pronoun is not an assault, a call to violence or anything else. If some trans individual gets their feelings hurt because someone called it by the 'wrong' pronoun - boo freakin' hoo. You ever watch 'Scrubs' where Dr. Cox called JD by a girl's name all the time? Was that violence? I'm sure in today's world, we couldn't have a show like 'Scrubs' (which was hilarious, btw) because too many 'its' might get their feelings hurt and protest.
So tired of the constant bullying of mainstream society by the 1% of mentally disturbed individuals who are insistent that their delusions are real, are legitimate and must be accepted and celebrated. Why we enable this delusional behavior is beyond my ability to comprehend. You want to play dress up after hours - I don't care. You want to identify as a male, female, horse, radish - I don't care. Just don't require me to accept, celebrate or understand your psychosis because I won't ever be able to do so. And if you attempt to groom children with your mental disorder, you're a criminal and should be prosecuted within the maximum limits of the law.
The irony is that the actual "violence" comes from the ones who get their assless chaps in a wad when you refer to them improperly.'Causes actual violence to trans people' - that is utterly preposterous. Words are not violence. Not calling someone by their preferred pronoun is not an assault, a call to violence or anything else. If some trans individual gets their feelings hurt because someone called it by the 'wrong' pronoun - boo freakin' hoo. You ever watch 'Scrubs' where Dr. Cox called JD by a girl's name all the time? Was that violence? I'm sure in today's world, we couldn't have a show like 'Scrubs' (which was hilarious, btw) because too many 'its' might get their feelings hurt and protest.
So tired of the constant bullying of mainstream society by the 1% of mentally disturbed individuals who are insistent that their delusions are real, are legitimate and must be accepted and celebrated. Why we enable this delusional behavior is beyond my ability to comprehend. You want to play dress up after hours - I don't care. You want to identify as a male, female, horse, radish - I don't care. Just don't require me to accept, celebrate or understand your psychosis because I won't ever be able to do so. And if you attempt to groom children with your mental disorder, you're a criminal and should be prosecuted within the maximum limits of the law.
False. The original pledge had the word "god" in it. It was changed and for a few years did not make the reference. It was reinstated in 1954 because of cold war tensions with godless communist countries. The same ones you support to this day.Like it was originally written and stayed until the 50s.
HAHA. These people are absolute lunatics.Looks like Democrats are now using their kids as domestic terrorist. We know Jameslee approves!
Liberalism personified.These crazed French protesting chicks must be big Biden supporters based on their underwear
Like it was originally written and stayed until the 50s.
These crazed French protesting chicks must be big Biden supporters based on their underwear
If you’re referring to Balch’s version it was an entirely different phrase and was never used. The pledge we use came from Bellamy in 1892: "I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." The ‘of the United States of America’ was slowly added until 1924 where it remained unchanged for thirty years until they stuck in the ‘under God’ in 54.False. The original pledge had the word "god" in it. It was changed and for a few years did not make the reference. It was reinstated in 1954 because of cold war tensions with godless communist countries. The same ones you support to this day.
If you’re referring to Balch’s version it was an entirely different phrase and was never used. The pledge we use came from Bellamy in 1892: "I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." The ‘of the United States of America’ was slowly added until 1924 where it remained unchanged for thirty years until they stuck in the ‘under God’ in 54.
And notice it says "and to the REPUBLIC" not "and to the "Democracy"If you’re referring to Balch’s version it was an entirely different phrase and was never used. The pledge we use came from Bellamy in 1892: "I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." The ‘of the United States of America’ was slowly added until 1924 where it remained unchanged for thirty years until they stuck in the ‘under God’ in 54.
I wish the Declaration guaranteed things. I could use that same 'life' as a legal argument for universal healthcare. Sadly it has no legal power.Ok. Now explain kamala leaving out the 'life' as one of the things guaranteed by the declaration of independence at the pro abortion rally.
Bitch.No offense but y’all here are old. That’s why you didn’t know who he was. Regardless I was just ribbing @hmt5000 because of this post:
Yes, so? We are a democratic republic. Saying either is applicable. Saying we aren't a democracy is like saying we aren't capitalist because farm subsidies exist. Nothing exists in a pure form which abides by the semantic line you're trying to draw.And notice it says "and to the REPUBLIC" not "and to the "Democracy"
Yeah, knowing stuff about things is for nerds right?Dion, the King Kong of Wikipedia.
So many that we're winning elections. What does that say about Republicans?
This is the way that her democrat mom raised her. A total bunch of unhinged lunatics. No wonder so many people are leaving the democrat party.
Liberal BlueAnon info page? Nah, that stuff is full of lies.Yeah, knowing stuff about things is for nerds right?
Completely false.Now apply to religion.
Yes, so? We are a democratic republic. Saying either is applicable. Saying we aren't a democracy is like saying we aren't capitalist because farm subsidies exist. Nothing exists in a pure form which abides by the semantic line you're trying to draw.
* KA - BOOM *the appeals court judges that Trump appointed called him a lying little bitch
“Plaintiff suggests that he may have declassified these documents when he was President,” the court wrote. “But the record contains no evidence that any of these records were declassified. And before the special master, Plaintiff resisted providing any evidence that he had declassified any of these documents.”
Sane? Funny considering all of the "insanity" coming from current Democrat policy.Of course. Any sane person would be. I didn't mean even-handed or centrist. I'm close to the furthest left you get in American politics and am proud of that. Never claim to be otherwise.
He's the Dong of King Kong.Dion, the King Kong of Wikipedia.
And while you are doing it lie and blame Trump for doing what you are doing.Working for the wrong oligarch.
Work for the right oligarchs and you can collect multi million dollar payments from Russians, run Governor kidnapping operations, try and instigate riots at the Capitol, etc. without ever fearing criminal charges.