ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Funny how he thinks Tate is some beacon of the right that we all worship or something when in fact the majority of us barely know anything about the guy and could care less about him.
No offense but y’all here are old. That’s why you didn’t know who he was. Regardless I was just ribbing @hmt5000 because of this post:
He isn't in custody. He was held for 45 minutes per reports and released due to lack of evidence. I love how leftist believe anything that they want to but no matter how much evidence you give them they won't believe something they don't want to.
 
'Causes actual violence to trans people' - that is utterly preposterous. Words are not violence. Not calling someone by their preferred pronoun is not an assault, a call to violence or anything else. If some trans individual gets their feelings hurt because someone called it by the 'wrong' pronoun - boo freakin' hoo. You ever watch 'Scrubs' where Dr. Cox called JD by a girl's name all the time? Was that violence? I'm sure in today's world, we couldn't have a show like 'Scrubs' (which was hilarious, btw) because too many 'its' might get their feelings hurt and protest.

So tired of the constant bullying of mainstream society by the 1% of mentally disturbed individuals who are insistent that their delusions are real, are legitimate and must be accepted and celebrated. Why we enable this delusional behavior is beyond my ability to comprehend. You want to play dress up after hours - I don't care. You want to identify as a male, female, horse, radish - I don't care. Just don't require me to accept, celebrate or understand your psychosis because I won't ever be able to do so. And if you attempt to groom children with your mental disorder, you're a criminal and should be prosecuted within the maximum limits of the law.
 
'Causes actual violence to trans people' - that is utterly preposterous. Words are not violence. Not calling someone by their preferred pronoun is not an assault, a call to violence or anything else. If some trans individual gets their feelings hurt because someone called it by the 'wrong' pronoun - boo freakin' hoo. You ever watch 'Scrubs' where Dr. Cox called JD by a girl's name all the time? Was that violence? I'm sure in today's world, we couldn't have a show like 'Scrubs' (which was hilarious, btw) because too many 'its' might get their feelings hurt and protest.

So tired of the constant bullying of mainstream society by the 1% of mentally disturbed individuals who are insistent that their delusions are real, are legitimate and must be accepted and celebrated. Why we enable this delusional behavior is beyond my ability to comprehend. You want to play dress up after hours - I don't care. You want to identify as a male, female, horse, radish - I don't care. Just don't require me to accept, celebrate or understand your psychosis because I won't ever be able to do so. And if you attempt to groom children with your mental disorder, you're a criminal and should be prosecuted within the maximum limits of the law.
Now apply to religion.
 
'Causes actual violence to trans people' - that is utterly preposterous. Words are not violence. Not calling someone by their preferred pronoun is not an assault, a call to violence or anything else. If some trans individual gets their feelings hurt because someone called it by the 'wrong' pronoun - boo freakin' hoo. You ever watch 'Scrubs' where Dr. Cox called JD by a girl's name all the time? Was that violence? I'm sure in today's world, we couldn't have a show like 'Scrubs' (which was hilarious, btw) because too many 'its' might get their feelings hurt and protest.

So tired of the constant bullying of mainstream society by the 1% of mentally disturbed individuals who are insistent that their delusions are real, are legitimate and must be accepted and celebrated. Why we enable this delusional behavior is beyond my ability to comprehend. You want to play dress up after hours - I don't care. You want to identify as a male, female, horse, radish - I don't care. Just don't require me to accept, celebrate or understand your psychosis because I won't ever be able to do so. And if you attempt to groom children with your mental disorder, you're a criminal and should be prosecuted within the maximum limits of the law.
The irony is that the actual "violence" comes from the ones who get their assless chaps in a wad when you refer to them improperly.
 
Looks like Democrats are now using their kids as domestic terrorist. We know Jameslee approves!

HAHA. These people are absolute lunatics.

I do love the "FIGHT THE ESTABLISHMENT! VIVA LA RESISTANCE!" shtick coming from a kid whose parent is in Congress. That's hilarious. You're totally not privileged in any way and a little rebel. Fight the machine from your posh house paid for by your parents.
 
False. The original pledge had the word "god" in it. It was changed and for a few years did not make the reference. It was reinstated in 1954 because of cold war tensions with godless communist countries. The same ones you support to this day.
If you’re referring to Balch’s version it was an entirely different phrase and was never used. The pledge we use came from Bellamy in 1892: "I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." The ‘of the United States of America’ was slowly added until 1924 where it remained unchanged for thirty years until they stuck in the ‘under God’ in 54.
 
If you’re referring to Balch’s version it was an entirely different phrase and was never used. The pledge we use came from Bellamy in 1892: "I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." The ‘of the United States of America’ was slowly added until 1924 where it remained unchanged for thirty years until they stuck in the ‘under God’ in 54.

Dion, the King Kong of Wikipedia.
 
If you’re referring to Balch’s version it was an entirely different phrase and was never used. The pledge we use came from Bellamy in 1892: "I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." The ‘of the United States of America’ was slowly added until 1924 where it remained unchanged for thirty years until they stuck in the ‘under God’ in 54.
And notice it says "and to the REPUBLIC" not "and to the "Democracy"
 
Ok. Now explain kamala leaving out the 'life' as one of the things guaranteed by the declaration of independence at the pro abortion rally.
I wish the Declaration guaranteed things. I could use that same 'life' as a legal argument for universal healthcare. Sadly it has no legal power.
 
And notice it says "and to the REPUBLIC" not "and to the "Democracy"
Yes, so? We are a democratic republic. Saying either is applicable. Saying we aren't a democracy is like saying we aren't capitalist because farm subsidies exist. Nothing exists in a pure form which abides by the semantic line you're trying to draw.
 
Yes, so? We are a democratic republic. Saying either is applicable. Saying we aren't a democracy is like saying we aren't capitalist because farm subsidies exist. Nothing exists in a pure form which abides by the semantic line you're trying to draw.


Where do you come up with this shit?

You’re like a poor man’s version of ChatGPT that only scrubs the bowels of Reddit and Vox to formulate responses to inquiries.
 
the appeals court judges that Trump appointed called him a lying little bitch

“Plaintiff suggests that he may have declassified these documents when he was President,” the court wrote. “But the record contains no evidence that any of these records were declassified. And before the special master, Plaintiff resisted providing any evidence that he had declassified any of these documents.”
* KA - BOOM *


Embarrassed?
 
Of course. Any sane person would be. I didn't mean even-handed or centrist. I'm close to the furthest left you get in American politics and am proud of that. Never claim to be otherwise.
Sane? Funny considering all of the "insanity" coming from current Democrat policy.

Not saying that Republicans have cornered the market on sanity, but clinging to a failed Marxist philosophy would suggest otherwise, at least in regards to your sanity. I know, it just hasn't been implemented correctly.

I suspect that you are, for the most part, sane and you seem to be quite educated But more than that, you seem to be an agenda driven, hive-minded party apparatchik - using (I assume) your preferred vernacular.

Accurate?
 
Working for the wrong oligarch.

Work for the right oligarchs and you can collect multi million dollar payments from Russians, run Governor kidnapping operations, try and instigate riots at the Capitol, etc. without ever fearing criminal charges.
And while you are doing it lie and blame Trump for doing what you are doing.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT