If it’s a fact finding committee why not release all the footage? Or is it just the facts as they want it to be represented?
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
This isn't what democratic leaders do in a functioning society.... This is what dictators and oligarchs do in totalitarian regimes.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/congress-security-omnibus-spending-bill-capitol/
The legislation, which spans 4,155 pages, includes direction to the Senate Sergeant at Arms to create a "residential security system program" to protect senators in their home states and towns. According to the legislation, "The program is focused on assisting in mitigating increased risks to the physical security of senators' residences both in the District of Columbia and in their home states. The agreement provides a total of $2,500,000 to be available until expended for the development and administration of a residential security system program." There's been growing concern about the well-being of senators and House members when they're outside the dome of security of U.S. Capitol Police on the Capitol grounds.
The spending bill also includes million of dollars to bolster House member security, including what appears to be a response to the attack against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband Paul Pelosi in California.
Congressional staffers told CBS News there's also a pressing need to increase protection for members of Congress who travel through the Washington, D.C.-area, including Virginia and Maryland, while outside of the protection of U.S. Capitol Police. In 2017, a gunman went on a shooting spree at a baseball practice in Virginia that wounded House Republican Whip Steve Scalise of Louisiana.
Weird that they acted because a left-wing illegal immigrant attacked Paul but not when a left-wing Bernie bro attacked a bunch of pubs.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/congress-security-omnibus-spending-bill-capitol/
The legislation, which spans 4,155 pages, includes direction to the Senate Sergeant at Arms to create a "residential security system program" to protect senators in their home states and towns. According to the legislation, "The program is focused on assisting in mitigating increased risks to the physical security of senators' residences both in the District of Columbia and in their home states. The agreement provides a total of $2,500,000 to be available until expended for the development and administration of a residential security system program." There's been growing concern about the well-being of senators and House members when they're outside the dome of security of U.S. Capitol Police on the Capitol grounds.
The spending bill also includes million of dollars to bolster House member security, including what appears to be a response to the attack against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband Paul Pelosi in California.
Congressional staffers told CBS News there's also a pressing need to increase protection for members of Congress who travel through the Washington, D.C.-area, including Virginia and Maryland, while outside of the protection of U.S. Capitol Police. In 2017, a gunman went on a shooting spree at a baseball practice in Virginia that wounded House Republican Whip Steve Scalise of Louisiana.
Weird that they acted because a left-wing illegal immigrant attacked Paul but not when a left-wing Bernie bro attacked a bunch of pubs.
Dude is lying. Nancy is seeking immunity because she knows the 14000 hours of video to dispute her insurrection on Jan 6th will get her hanged for Treason.
What happened on 29 Feb 2011?
Wisconsin state capital?
What did evil pelosi say about that?
Wisconsin state capital?
What did evil pelosi say about that?
Wisconsin.
Look to Racine. Why is Racine ground zero for all globalist movement in the world?
Why is Racine important to the globalist moloch agenda? Why is Hunter Biden back tattoo important? Questions upon questions
Most of the Trump discussion comes from the people who hate him.
They are basically fighting with straw men.
Lol, stupid woman who names rhymes with “plying punt”
She said, "Paul got hammered again!"
I don’t go to rally’s of any kind regardless who is speaking but it still shows the level of support for each party. Sorry but I’m not convinced that half this country are as stupid as you are, if they are then we deserve every ****ing thing that is happening to us.
What does any of this mean? “find re-approval for illegal electors.” Which electors are you calling illegal? Trump’s? Or the ones that got counted to make Biden president? And it’s never been legal for the VP to question the election. Their role is purely ceremonial. Objections must be raised in writing by one House member and one joining Senate member.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion language has increased “exponentially” over the past several years in STEM, according to a quantitative study from the National Association of Scholars, which argued in releasing its findings that the trend “promises to do great intellectual and economic damage.”
There is a conversion from seeking truth to forwarding political objectives.
We are not sending boots on the ground to Ukraine. Neither the US nor broader NATO are having an open war with Russia. You are wrong.
Then why did they add the part to take out the VP’s presence in the new omnibus bill? Care to answer that. I know you only answer questions that you can provide lies to.
People that love him.
Thats not what last weeks intel report said...
What a quote haha
Also, taking stupid dramatic pictures that look like a poster to a new movie coming out is really going to make everyone take you more seriously...
Also, taking stupid dramatic pictures that look like a poster to a new movie coming out is really going to make everyone take you more seriously...
No shit, that’s exactly what was happening.
The narrative is that Trump wanted Pence to just put a halt to the count or say he won, that wasn’t the case.
The VP role is not ceremonial, the congress raises objections and presents evidence that there was shenanigans. The VP as the chair of the hearing can adjourn it. In no way shape or form is it ceremonial, it’s why there’s alternate ways to elect a President.
The riot started at exactly the moment the evidence was being presented…conveniently.
Furthermore, what was just passed in no way changes what can happen. The Constitition lays it out, abd can only be changed with an amendment.
Amazing how Mike Pence did not get subpoenaed by the Jan 6th committee nor raided by the FBI.
It’s hilarious because unlike the Dem cheaters, Trump’s lawyers signaled their intentions and openly laid out their plan in advance.
Nothing was being done in secret.
But two years later, the lib crazies come out and blather on and on about the plan as if it was something nefarious.
And those of us who followed it all along just nod and say, “yes, that was the plan.”
You want proof that the plan was a good one? The deep state stirred up a “riot” to stop the proceedings. Pelosi even had a film crew there.
Also amazing that Bill Barr got a multimillion dollar book deal. I believe Pence did too.
It’s crazy, they were following the Constitition on what to do. Now you’ve got Jamie Raskin stating the electoral college is a threat to Democracy, lol.
Amazing. I’m sure it’s just coincidental.
A year long fishing expedition/witch hunt and an absolute travesty of law.
To remove any ambiguity. The Electoral Count Act uses legally imprecise language by our modern standards. The applicable rules for Electoral counting are in one 275 word sentence for crying out loud. Here it is:
“If more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State shall have been received by the President of the Senate, those votes, and those only, shall be counted which shall have been regularly given by the electors who are shown by the determination mentioned in section 5 of this title to have been appointed, if the determination in said section provided for shall have been made, or by such successors or substitutes, in case of a vacancy in the board of electors so ascertained, as have been appointed to fill such vacancy in the mode provided by the laws of the State; but in case there shall arise the question which of two or more of such State authorities determining what electors have been appointed, as mentioned in section 5 of this title, is the lawful tribunal of such State, the votes regularly given of those electors, and those only, of such State shall be counted whose title as electors the two Houses, acting separately, shall concurrently decide is supported by the decision of such State so authorized by its law; and in such case of more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State, if there shall have been no such determination of the question in the State aforesaid, then those votes, and those only, shall be counted which the two Houses shall concurrently decide were cast by lawful electors appointed in accordance with the laws of the State, unless the two Houses, acting separately, shall concurrently decide such votes not to be the lawful votes of the legally appointed electors of such State.”
Nowhere in that does it give the VP power to act unilaterally. Here’s the text of the entire thing if you want to read it for yourself.
Jamie Raskins needs to be hanged in GITMO by the U.S Military.
Raskins claimed election fraud in 2016.
I have already read it. You are lying again. Do you need that one guy to drive by and give your lies some type of legitimacy? Just @ him lol
Pence had every power to dispute a fraud election. He didn’t. His reward for the fraud. Book deal and no FBI raids
No one wanted him to act unilaterally, that’s the narrative being pushed.
Ok so none of this is correct. The VP has no power to do anything except what he is instructed to in the Electoral Count Act. There is no constitutional mechanism for objecting either, the one House and Senate member part is in that Electoral Count Act, not the Constitution. The new omnibus piece clarifies that Act, which doesn’t require an amendment.
That was specifically the plan, as laid out in the Eastman memos by Trump’s lawyer, John Eastman himself.
Was it ok for the convicted felon who illegally had a gun also that Rittenhouse defended himself from? Was it ok for him to have a gun? You think he actually went up there to intentionally kill people?
Then post the part of the Act that gives the VP that power. I posted the applicable part that shows it doesn’t.
Neither of those over rule the Constitution. They just don’t, without a Constitutional ammendment the SCOTUS would rule in favor of the Constitution every time.
The VP as chair can rule to adjourn or delay, to think they couldn’t is absurd. Hell, the Democrats had just shat all over the Constitution by filing lawsuits that ignored state laws on voting. The Constitution lays they out with no ambiguity, yet lo and behold they bypassed that hurdle.
No it wasn’t, they had alternate electors, which is perfectly legal if contested States original votes were cast out.
Again, that was after the evidence had been presented in both houses and they had voted on them, again, perfectly legal.
The new omnibus bill.
The Constitution gives VPs the ability to dispute a fraudulent election
You helped to steal the election
Similar threads
