ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Killing babies for birth control, there you have it.


7c567388799afb59.jpg
Most are selfish reasons. It is sad that women are convinced abortion is their best plan.
 
These people keep calling me to do some survey....everyone one of them sound foreign as f--k.

Today the guy said in terrible English, 'my name is Alan Miles, I'm calling because...'

I said 'your name ain't no motherf-cking Alan Miles' click.

I once was talking to a customer service woman who sounded really Indian...she said her name was George...'excuse me, did you say George?'
 
SCOTUS needs to make their ruling final. Longer this drags on the worse it’s going to get for them and their families having lunatics protesting at their homes and even worse trying to do harm to them which I can 100% see happening.

I suspect the dissenters are in no hurry to finalize their dissent, especially given that they were expecting this decision to be the final one released this summer.

Additionally, my hunch is that Roberts, at least, will be drafting his own, squishy, dissent, likely with some degree of focus on stare decisis.
 
The very reason why getting rid of Roe is a great thing for democracy. Let the people actually be heard and see if Tomi is right or wrong.
Let’s emphasize this. Getting rid of Roe could take the abortion debate out of federal government and back to state governments. That would arguably be best for both entities. Fabricating a spot for abortion in the constitution was one of the worst things to happen to this country over the past 50 years.
 
You’re asking vague questions. First:

Which I answered. And now:

Which is also extremely vague. Inflation sucks, but it would’ve been like this regardless of who was in office, the president isn’t an omnipotent god. He doesn’t cause all the bad things just like he shouldn’t get credit for all the good things. Things suck, but they would’ve been worse under Trump. We can go over speculations of how on every single issue but it’s a pointless exercise as likely your and my ideas of what are bad and good will be drastically different as we’re probably on opposite sides of most issues.
It could be worse if build back better passed, etc. That's a reality, Democrats have passed several bills without figuring out how to pay for them, starting with a "covid relief bill", and endless others bc theyll always go back to the well and attack citizens that they need to give up more. Now imagine if it was a progressive govt, who's "solution" to everything boils down to dumping money on everything then demanding you give them more of it. Put on top of that if they got the 50 vote threshold.

That's a major difference...after 4 years of record filibuster #'s by democrats, R's never tried to change those rules. While you can point to the crazy ppl under Trump, Republicans as a whole have never tried to run things by mob rule. Democrats do..why else leak this scotus opinion when it would eventually come out anyway, or attack places like Disney (That's out of their playbook, and it backfired, as well as why companies are now silent on this Scotus thing)

This is a common theme with the left: when they don't get what they want, it's ALWAYS bc the rules are wrong...until they aren't and work for them.

Free speech is now white supremecy, Turning things over to the ppl to decide is ending democracy, corporations are bad and need to pay a fair share unless they're good then they deserve tax exemptions, transparency is bad if stories on the presidents son aren't deplatformed so we'll pretend this means nazis are taking over platforms, disinformation only flows in one direction, leakers are heros unless we say they are effecting democracy, norms are a tossup...some times they're good, sometimes not.

My favorite in the last day: the founders were white men so they were wrong and shouldn't be taken seriously but in a few months when the issue is something else, it will be ackshully that's not what the founders meant on this issue.
 
These people keep calling me to do some survey....everyone one of them sound foreign as f--k.

Today the guy said in terrible English, 'my name is Alan Miles, I'm calling because...'

I said 'your name ain't no motherf-cking Alan Miles' click.

I once was talking to a customer service woman who sounded really Indian...she said her name was George...'excuse me, did you say George?'

I get that at work all the time. Thick as can be Indian accent "Hi my name is Steve..."
 
You’re asking vague questions. First:

Which I answered. And now:

Which is also extremely vague. Inflation sucks, but it would’ve been like this regardless of who was in office, the president isn’t an omnipotent god. He doesn’t cause all the bad things just like he shouldn’t get credit for all the good things. Things suck, but they would’ve been worse under Trump. We can go over speculations of how on every single issue but it’s a pointless exercise as likely your and my ideas of what are bad and good will be drastically different as we’re probably on opposite sides of most issues.
Really? When the swipe of the pen biden literally turned off our energy production. The single greatest driver in higher prices is the massive increase in energy costs. Biden literally is 100% responsible for that. He did that.
 
Whether or not you agree with the legal underpinnings of the decision, the fact is that we as Americans currently have a legal right that when this ruling goes into effect will be obliterated. The right’s championing of this and cheering it on highlights just how much bullshit their entire philosophy is. They care not one lick about our rights or freedoms, only evoking their name in calculated lip service when it benefits them. They’ll openly try to destroy them if it lets them oppress a group they don’t like.
Honestly, I did not see RvW ever being overturned. But I'm cheering on the correct interpretation of the constitution, because the RvW decision was always the prime example of judicial activism and creating "rights" where none existed.

But let's look at this realistically, because the rhetoric you ended your post with is just right-is-evil, playing-the-victim bullsh!t. You will have about 20 states that will ban abortions, about 20 states that will continue or expand the right to abortions, and about 10 states that will be somewhere in between. The right to abortions will remain, but you might be inconvenienced to travel a little to kill your fetus. Sorry/not sorry for your inconvenience.
 
Whether or not you agree with the legal underpinnings of the decision, the fact is that we as Americans currently have a legal right that when this ruling goes into effect will be obliterated. The right’s championing of this and cheering it on highlights just how much bullshit their entire philosophy is. They care not one lick about our rights or freedoms, only evoking their name in calculated lip service when it benefits them. They’ll openly try to destroy them if it lets them oppress a group they don’t like.
hfiepxpttnx81.jpg
 
You f-ckers won't listen. Bet the reds to lose by at least 2 every game...bet that their opponent will at least score 5 runs every game.




Cash.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: blubo
https://thinkprogress.org/thomas-hofeller-trump-census-racist-rigging-5ab9f81864bd/

This is a great story. The GoP strategist behind the last 40 years of GoP gerrymandering and other dirty shit died. His daughter found his hard drives that contained all the data he used and the briefs he wrote that DoJ used to argue in favor of census question in front of the supreme court. I guess she didn't like her dad because she told opposing counsel about the drives so they could be subpoenaed. The memo's and data easily show the DoJ perjured themselves numerous times in federal court and in front of SCOTUS.
* KA - BOOM *



[laughing]
 
You’re asking vague questions. First:

Which I answered. And now:

Which is also extremely vague. Inflation sucks, but it would’ve been like this regardless of who was in office, the president isn’t an omnipotent god. He doesn’t cause all the bad things just like he shouldn’t get credit for all the good things. Things suck, but they would’ve been worse under Trump. We can go over speculations of how on every single issue but it’s a pointless exercise as likely your and my ideas of what are bad and good will be drastically different as we’re probably on opposite sides of most issues.
- The Border crisis is the direct result of Joe Bidens reversals of Trump policies.
- The Afghanistan Debacle was the direct result of Joe Biden's ineptness.
- Inflation was stable during Trumps presidency it has rapidly increased under Biden's out of control spending.
- Gas prices were stable and we were generally considered energy independent under Trump. Biden reversed the reasons for that, and now we have stupid high gas prices.
- Russia would not be in Iraq if Trump was President.
This list could go on and on. I still want to know what "worse" means in your determination, because none of the things I just listed would be "worse" those are facts, not speculation.
 
SCOTUS needs to make their ruling final. Longer this drags on the worse it’s going to get for them and their families having lunatics protesting at their homes and even worse trying to do harm to them which I can 100% see happening.
They should booby trap their property with a warning saying so and you enter at your own risk. If you die we will call it aborted suicide. You wanted to kill yourselves but were too scared to do it so, you invaded my property to be killed by it.
 
Honestly, I did not see RvW ever being overturned. But I'm cheering on the correct interpretation of the constitution, because the RvW decision was always the prime example of judicial activism and creating "rights" where none existed.

But let's look at this realistically, because the rhetoric you ended your post with is just right-is-evil, playing-the-victim bullsh!t. You will have about 20 states that will ban abortions, about 20 states that will continue or expand the right to abortions, and about 10 states that will be somewhere in between. The right to abortions will remain, but you might be inconvenienced to travel a little to kill your fetus. Sorry/not sorry for your inconvenience.
Exactly. It's a minor inconvenience for someone with money and it's likely a financial impossibility for poor people. As always with conservatives; "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
 
Great plan. Wait until oil is super high and then buy. This is sure to raise the price of oil even farther too. Get you EV now. WEF should be happy.

Evidently Biden missed the "buy low, sell high" lecture at Delaware U.

Of course, when its not YOUR money... who cares?
 
We'd be in a much worse position. I know you don't believe that, but nobody really knows. It's all speculation. And even Sleepy Joe's more capable than the orange narcissist.
You make the dumbest statements I've ever seen online.

 
You’re asking vague questions. First:

Which I answered. And now:

Which is also extremely vague. Inflation sucks, but it would’ve been like this regardless of who was in office, the president isn’t an omnipotent god. He doesn’t cause all the bad things just like he shouldn’t get credit for all the good things. Things suck, but they would’ve been worse under Trump. We can go over speculations of how on every single issue but it’s a pointless exercise as likely your and my ideas of what are bad and good will be drastically different as we’re probably on opposite sides of most issues.
False on "only it would have been this way no matter who was in office". Geez you guys never take responsibility for the mistakes you make.
 
Last edited:

'Journalist'...LOL. Looks like the guy wrote his own lame bio. 'Executive' at the C of C? Office of one.
Grocery store?


Simon Gwynn on Muck Rack


Simon Gwynn

Technology and Gaming Editor, Campaign (UK)
Simon Gwynn’s Biography
Simon is a reporter on the Buying & Supplying desk, where he covers fmcg product news. His patch includes beers & spirits, cereals, sauces & condiments and savoury snacks.
He joined The Grocer in September 2014, after completing an MA in magazine journalism at City University London. Before deciding to pursue a career in journalism, Simon worked as an events and communications executive for a local chamber of commerce.
A long time before that, he spent two years of Saturdays behind a checkout in Somerfield, Ecclesall Road, Sheffield.
 
It hasn't been different though. But your avg Trump voter is better than your avg Biden voter with being informed. Most people are very low info. It's amazing some of the stuff going on this country that people think is true or false that isn't even in argument by people in the know.

You don't have to like Trump but that doesn't give the dnc, fbi, cia and doj the right to frame the man for treason and then lie about it for 6 years. I think a lot of us want to clean the rino's out of the pub party. America first shouldn't be a negative in a political campaign.
Not VH. He loves him some RINOS. He has a Mitch poster on his bedroom wall.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT