ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
PIC-2-EDIT.png
Yeah I hated to actually say it. But they can’t unring this bell.
 
All we heard out of the righties was BLM have no right to shut down bridges or roads. If they block roads it's gonna be "Black Lives Splatter".
How does BLM have time to protest all day? They need to get a job and can't block hard working people from trying to get to their jobs. They are blocking roads and keeping emergency vehicles from getting thru.
Fast forward to this year....Righties now say truckers have the right to block roads for weeks, block bridges for weeks, stop workers from getting to work, shut down supply chains and cripple the car industry who is now laying off workers.
Hypocritical stupid M'fers don't even see the irony.
Once again...its simple, lift mandates, it's over.

Blm was not going to quit..again who cause 1 billion in damage
 
Last edited:
Hmm, I'm going to differ with you here, especially on the "critical thinker" side of your chart.

What's in it? I'll just do Pfizer:

mRNA - the only active ingredient
lipids -
  • ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis
  • (2-hexyldecanoate), 2 [(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide
  • 1,2-Distearoyl-snglycero-3- phosphocholine
  • cholesterol
salts -
  • potassium chloride
  • monobasic potassium phosphate
  • sodium chloride
  • dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate
sucrose

Who developed it? Thousands of researchers had their hand in developing mRNA technology over the past 30+ years. This one was developed by Pfizer/BioNtech


Who manufactured it? Pfizer and BioNtech

What is their track record? With what exactly? Pfizer was founded in 1849. They appear to be one of the better pharmaceutical companies.

Do they have legal liability? No, vaccine manufacturers don't have direct liability and for good reason.

How long was it tested for? Months, but it isn't as simple as that. A much larger trial was performed than normal to allow for more rapid use. The basic technology has been studied for decades. This is a biased question, not one of critical thinking. You should probably read this. https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

Who is telling me to get it? Both government entities and 99% of the medical profession. This is another biased question that has nothing to do with critical thinking.

What is their track record? Who exactly? The medical profession? Quite good. The government? Who cares.

Is it effective? Good question but too broad. How is effective being defined? Does it prevent the virus, yes, but not as much as hoped. Does it protect against serious illness and death? Yes, it does appear to be effective in that manner.

Is it necessary for my age? A good question and one to take up with your physician.

How many side effects reported? Terrible question. Reported means little. I imagine the question is referring to the VAERS system which is open to anyone to report anything, true or not. Confirmed side effects along with probabilities would be a better question.

How many deaths reported? See previous answer.
Logic and facts don't go far on here with most.
 
Yes. They said Jews will not replace us. It’s clear as day and on video. Your reluctance to admit that says a lot about you and your personal beliefs.
No, it says that you are either lying or don’t know what you’re talking about. My guess is both are accurate.

My personal belief that accusing someone of something they didn’t say is wrong is bad in your world? Hmm
 
  • Like
Reactions: P19978
You can thank Trump for his 4 years of tariffs that were slowly ****ing up the supply chain right as the pandemic hit. All those "elitist globalists" are the people you can thank for you cheap goods. And now your pretending to be mad that prices go up if your attack their business? The global supply chain is run on a very precise timetable and with very little long-term warehousing. The tariffs were forcing reworks of chains and then the pandemic just completely ruined the balance and shipping costs skyrocketed. On top of all this now millions of wealthy Americans have spent the last year spending very little discretionary money and getting stimulus checks. Now they ready to spend out the ass and give no ****s what it costs. The US isn't capable of supplying itself with all the shit we consume. And manufactures can't find people to fill jobs right now and these are jobs that pay well over the extra unemployment money. And now a lot of these corporations see what prices Americans are really willing to pay and won't be lowering them anytime soon.
* KA - BOOM *



Handing you your ass every single day.
 
Hmm, I'm going to differ with you here, especially on the "critical thinker" side of your chart.

What's in it? I'll just do Pfizer:

mRNA - the only active ingredient
lipids -
  • ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis
  • (2-hexyldecanoate), 2 [(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide
  • 1,2-Distearoyl-snglycero-3- phosphocholine
  • cholesterol
salts -
  • potassium chloride
  • monobasic potassium phosphate
  • sodium chloride
  • dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate
sucrose

Who developed it? Thousands of researchers had their hand in developing mRNA technology over the past 30+ years. This one was developed by Pfizer/BioNtech


Who manufactured it? Pfizer and BioNtech

What is their track record? With what exactly? Pfizer was founded in 1849. They appear to be one of the better pharmaceutical companies.

Do they have legal liability? No, vaccine manufacturers don't have direct liability and for good reason.

How long was it tested for? Months, but it isn't as simple as that. A much larger trial was performed than normal to allow for more rapid use. The basic technology has been studied for decades. This is a biased question, not one of critical thinking. You should probably read this. https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

Who is telling me to get it? Both government entities and 99% of the medical profession. This is another biased question that has nothing to do with critical thinking.

What is their track record? Who exactly? The medical profession? Quite good. The government? Who cares.

Is it effective? Good question but too broad. How is effective being defined? Does it prevent the virus, yes, but not as much as hoped. Does it protect against serious illness and death? Yes, it does appear to be effective in that manner.

Is it necessary for my age? A good question and one to take up with your physician.

How many side effects reported? Terrible question. Reported means little. I imagine the question is referring to the VAERS system which is open to anyone to report anything, true or not. Confirmed side effects along with probabilities would be a better question.

How many deaths reported? See previous answer.
Which Pharma co has paid the most in penaltues for fraud? If u said Pfizer you’re the winner.
 
Hmm, I'm going to differ with you here, especially on the "critical thinker" side of your chart.

What's in it? I'll just do Pfizer:

mRNA - the only active ingredient
lipids -
  • ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis
  • (2-hexyldecanoate), 2 [(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide
  • 1,2-Distearoyl-snglycero-3- phosphocholine
  • cholesterol
salts -
  • potassium chloride
  • monobasic potassium phosphate
  • sodium chloride
  • dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate
sucrose

Who developed it? Thousands of researchers had their hand in developing mRNA technology over the past 30+ years. This one was developed by Pfizer/BioNtech


Who manufactured it? Pfizer and BioNtech

What is their track record? With what exactly? Pfizer was founded in 1849. They appear to be one of the better pharmaceutical companies.

Do they have legal liability? No, vaccine manufacturers don't have direct liability and for good reason.

How long was it tested for? Months, but it isn't as simple as that. A much larger trial was performed than normal to allow for more rapid use. The basic technology has been studied for decades. This is a biased question, not one of critical thinking. You should probably read this. https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf

Who is telling me to get it? Both government entities and 99% of the medical profession. This is another biased question that has nothing to do with critical thinking.

What is their track record? Who exactly? The medical profession? Quite good. The government? Who cares.

Is it effective? Good question but too broad. How is effective being defined? Does it prevent the virus, yes, but not as much as hoped. Does it protect against serious illness and death? Yes, it does appear to be effective in that manner.

Is it necessary for my age? A good question and one to take up with your physician.

How many side effects reported? Terrible question. Reported means little. I imagine the question is referring to the VAERS system which is open to anyone to report anything, true or not. Confirmed side effects along with probabilities would be a better question.

How many deaths reported? See previous answer.

Reported means very little? Have to disagree.

80 percent of VAERS reporting is done by physicians/healthcare personnel/etc.

Its can be a felony to false report.

VAERS has always been used as an early warning sign and monitoring system by the CDC until now. Now it’s being discredited by msm. Ask yourself why?

32k deaths

2m adverse events

In today’s climate where I can’t even post a silly meme without getting labeled as misinformation. Where the POTUS is calling for censorship of a talk show host. A family posting on fb that their kid took the vaccine and was dead within a day gets deleted ASAP.

Do you really think the gov would allow readily available public misinformation to take place on their own database? Zero chance.

———————

I purposefully left off the Harvard study showing VAERS is vastly underreported.
 
Last edited:
Doesn't surprise me. The amount of actual good jobs in sports management is tiny.
And sports world has become so specialized, it's better to just major in something else. Like you want to get into the finance side of sports? Major in finance, minor in sports management, then do an internship with a sports organization to get your foot in the door.
 
What if I told you that the crime in the headline paled in comparison to the other things this pair of assholes are guilty of? The crime in the headline got her one year in prison if that tells you anything.

 
If you don’t understand why questioning government motive is a sign of critical thinking, it is very hard to believe any of the rest of that.
The question was framed to support a preconceived opinion. That is not critical thinking. If you think it is, you are incorrect.
 
Which Pharma co has paid the most in penaltues for fraud? If u said Pfizer you’re the winner.
Sort of. They marketed some drugs off label. They shouldn't have. All the big pharmaceutical companies have been hammered in one way or another. That leads to our ridiculous drug prices. Have they done anything you consider good?
 
Reported means very little? Have to disagree.

80 percent of VAERS reporting is done by physicians/healthcare personnel/etc.

Its can be a felony to false report.

VAERS has always been used as an early warning sign and monitoring system by the CDC until now. Now it’s being discredited by msm. Ask yourself why?

32k deaths

2m adverse events

In today’s climate where I can’t even post a silly meme without getting labeled as misinformation. Where the POTUS is calling for censorship of a talk show host. A family posting on fb that their kid took the vaccine and was dead within a day gets deleted ASAP.

Do you really think the gov would allow readily available public misinformation to take place on their own database? Zero chance.

———————

I purposefully left off the Harvard study showing VAERS is vastly underreported.


 
Reported means very little? Have to disagree.

80 percent of VAERS reporting is done by physicians/healthcare personnel/etc.

Its can be a felony to false report.

VAERS has always been used as an early warning sign and monitoring system by the CDC until now. Now it’s being discredited by msm. Ask yourself why?

32k deaths

2m adverse events

In today’s climate where I can’t even post a silly meme without getting labeled as misinformation. Where the POTUS is calling for censorship of a talk show host. A family posting on fb that their kid took the vaccine and was dead within a day gets deleted ASAP.

Do you really think the gov would allow readily available public misinformation to take place on their own database? Zero chance.

———————

I purposefully left off the Harvard study showing VAERS is vastly underreported.
Your numbers are ridiculously incorrect as reported by the people who run the database you're so proud of. As of this month the CDC has investigated 12000 reported deaths after vaccines and has made a link to a small handful.
 
It's time for conservatives to wake up and realize that the violent elements of BLM have taken over the Democrat Party. It's time for people to arm themselves.

See Rand Paul getting beaten up and Steve Scalise getting shot.
Really? Who knew it's just now time? LMAO.
 
Your numbers are ridiculously incorrect as reported by the people who run the database you're so proud of. As of this month the CDC has investigated 12000 reported deaths after vaccines and has made a link to a small handful.
In my circle I know more that have had a bad reaction to the shot than had og or delta covid.

No bad reactions were reported.


I know two that died with covid and two that died of a severe stroke within a month of being boosted. They had heart racing issues within one day. It does not say they died of vax issues.


If the CDC says it's only a handful, I guess you have critically thought this through.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT