ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%

  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%
  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Platinumdrgn said:
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/23/gop...emocrats-take-12-point-lead-nbc-wsj-poll.html
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/23/poli...ch-mcconnell-christine-blasey-ford/index.html
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...umber-voters-oppose-kavanaugh-nomination.html
Its firing up the wrong base for you. McConnell had to call Trump and beg him to stop tweeting about Kavanaugh. It's reached the point now where the Senate race is literally a 50/50 tossup when just 2 months ago the Dem's had 0 chance of taking it.

The survey, six weeks before Americans head to the polls, shows Democrats leading Republicans by 52 percent to 40 percent for control of Congress. If it holds, that 12 percentage point margin would suggest a "blue wave" large enough to switch control of not just the House but also the Senate.

"The results could not be clearer about making a change in direction from Trump's policies," explained Bill McInturff, the Republican pollster who helps conduct the NBC/WSJ survey. "Once again, Americans are hitting the brakes in a mid-term."
Click to expand...
* KA - BOOM *



scooby-doo-laugh.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: PhDcat2018, exemjr, KyCatFan and 2 others
  • Like
Reactions: trueblujr2, exemjr, KyCatFan and 1 other person
KyCatFan said:
That should be illegal for one person or company to put that kind of money into elections. You're just asking for suspicious things to happen. No outside source should be able to try and influence election outcomes like that. Hopefully the scumbag loses all that money and gets nothing to show for it.
Click to expand...
I am of the opinion that he is a front man for other WEF members to donate without being seen.

He has bought countless local elections by overwhelming the opposing candidate with the sheer amount of money he contributes. All this catch and release crap is all his doing.

Scary thing is, that 125M is just a drop in the bucket compared to the amount of money he has funneled into various organizations, political and otherwise. Think billions, with a B.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KyCatFan and OHIO COLONEL
Some of you have been talking about this in the last few day.s I believe.. @UKUGA

www.foxbusiness.com

Treasury reconsiders IRS' use of facial recognition company ID.me

The Treasury Department is reassessing the Internal Revenue Service’s use of third-party facial recognition software ID.me for access to taxpayer accounts amid growing concerns about the company's privacy practices.
www.foxbusiness.com www.foxbusiness.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKUGA, BigBlueDave, trueblujr2 and 1 other person
How do you know if you’re pregnant but you’re a biological male?

I’m googling but it just comes up as black cocks and pink haired women’s.
 
KyCatFan said:
That should be illegal for one person or company to put that kind of money into elections. You're just asking for suspicious things to happen. No outside source should be able to try and influence election outcomes like that. Hopefully the scumbag loses all that money and gets nothing to show for it.
Click to expand...
A lot of that moneys isn’t going into honest things like advertising and marketing materials. It’s going into buying votes, ballot harvesting, paying for activist poll workers, BS like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OHIO COLONEL, KyCatFan, augustaky1 and 1 other person
LowCountryCat said:
That word doesn't mean what you think it means. Wow, you don't even understand what Darwinian evolution claims to be. You don't know the difference between evolution of species and the generic, bland definition of evolution? You actually believe that the evolution you just described is the same as what Darwin claimed, which is that species added DNA information to itself and became another species? Darwinian evolution isn't just adaptation to environment; it's CHANGING THE DNA.

We can't discuss this if you can't even understand the most rudimentary definitions of terms. And you clearly lack self control because every post of yours involves you launching some sort of insult at me. Can you discuss this without getting personal or using pejoratives?

I also noticed that you have dodged the mathematical aspect of this. You know you can't argue it.

You're waaaay out of your league here.

Amino acids are components of proteins – which are essential to life. The amino acid alanine, for example consists of 13 atoms of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen arranged in a particular structure. Tyrosine is somewhat larger with 20 atoms arranged in a different structure. Experiments or conditions that allow the right elements to mix and provide the requisite energy to initiate reactions can produce such molecules. Some of these experiments – like the famous ones of Miller and Urey – are touted as evidence that the “molecules of life” are easily formed. (That’s not strictly true, but requires a longer discussion.) But amino acids must be combined carefully into proteins to allow functionality in living organisms.

I'll give you a head start though...Evolution says we came from nothing - random formation of molecules into proteins over billions of years. It would be literally mathematically impossible for even one single protein to form under those conditions - BUT I'LL SPOT YOU FAVORABLE CONDITIONS! And then we'll talk about the math. Fair enough? Yes or no?

By the way, the conditions I'll spot you are these:

Consider just one solitary protein molecule consisting of a particular sequence of 400 amino acids. There are 20 amino acids to choose from for every unit in the sequence. Now let’s consider the following fanciful conditions, all chosen to make it possible to form a single chain of just the right collection of amino acids:

1. A vat or sea of only the 20 left-handed amino acids useful to life is prepared at just the right concentration, temperature, and other physical conditions. (This would be impossible under natural conditions which would produce other amino acids, including the right-handed variety, plus toxic chemicals. Also, natural concentrations in a pre-biotic world would be hopelessly low.)

2. A chain of 400 amino acids is formed. (This is impossible thermodynamically, without the “factory” of a cell for the protein’s manufacture. Each peptide bond requires energy and the presence of water destroys bonds much more quickly than they can be formed under natural conditions.)

3. This single “protein” of 400 amino acids is stable enough to hang around and wait for a gazillion other such proteins, plus sugars, plus nucleic acids, plus large structures of these constituents, etc., in order to be useful at all.

Given the above fanciful conditions, what are the odds against this protein getting the amino acid order correct?
Click to expand...
Many evolutionary scientists who believe it happened also say it was a one time "accidental happenstance" and that the likelihood of it (life from no life) happening is astronomical if not impossible. But it happened once. It is crazy how you can hang your belief on something even they say is basically impossible. They need it to be true so they can rule out the existence of God in their minds. Which suggest to me that there is another force helping them to accept that and reject that there is a divine Creator.
 
Are Christianity and Catholicism treated as separate groups who believe in different entities? I've always assumed Catholics were Christian, since they both believe in Christ. This thread seems to have turned that notion on it's head.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trueblujr2
warrior-cat said:
Many evolutionary scientists who believe it happened also say it was a one time "accidental happenstance" and that the likelihood of it (life from no life) happening is astronomical if not impossible. But it happened once. It is crazy how you can hang your belief on something even they say is basically impossible. They need it to be true so they can rule out the existence of God in their minds. Which suggest to me that there is another force helping them to accept that and reject that there is a divine Creator.
Click to expand...

I'm probably best described as agnostic. While I reject the notion that one day there were no humans on the earth and the next day there were exactly 2, I also think there is a creator who set everything in motion. I don't think a belief in God and a belief in the bible verbatim are tied together.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vhcat70 and blubo
BigTimeBecks3500 said:
I'm probably best described as agnostic. While I reject the notion that one day there were no humans on the earth and the next day there were exactly 2, I also think there is a creator who set everything in motion. I don't think a belief in God and a belief in the bible verbatim are tied together.
Click to expand...
But that is not exactly correct. On the 6th day God created man and on the 7th he rested. Then came Adam and Eve. But you must also consider what a day is to God.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OHIO COLONEL, dukesince91, FirewithFire and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

flacat22

AND THATS WHY THEY PLAY THE GAME!!! GO CATS!!

Replies
25
Views
1K
Rupp Rafters - Basketball Forum
flacat22
flacat22
funKYcat75
  • Poll

Best Christmas Movie - Round Two - Game 7

Replies
3
Views
550
The Paddock - General Discussion Forum
AshWilliams
AshWilliams
T

David Lynch and Mulholland Drive

Replies
9
Views
529
The Paddock - General Discussion Forum
UnfrozenCatfanLawyer
UnfrozenCatfanLawyer
M

Pope will right the ship

Replies
25
Views
806
The House of Blue
jboliv01
jboliv01
Mime-Is-Money

Koby Brea Appreciation - Great game Saturday

Replies
12
Views
519
The House of Blue
jhol
J
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back