I am already exhausted with the 2016 election and its not really even started yet. More BS, lies, empty promises, etc.
Political Thread: Non-obscene version
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
- Status
"Negative lifestyle choices"
Is that the same thing as bunkum?
This post was edited on 4/17 7:34 PM by DUNNSTILLFREENALIVE
Is that the same thing as bunkum?
This post was edited on 4/17 7:34 PM by DUNNSTILLFREENALIVE
Ohio house bill 147 your thoughts
Representative Ron hood has proposed a bill that will allow any person over the age of 21 be permitted to own and handle a gun without any type of training or knowledge on using it safely. I do believe in the second amendment, but this kind of makes things even worse for everyone. Obviously the rule does not apply to convicts, but anyone who's not a felon and over the age of 21. I know this is technically a political issue, but it has nothing to do with republicans and democrats. The claim the guy made about getting this bill to the house is a single mom or dad can't pay for their training and permit. To that I say, how the hell can they afford the gun? Personally, this might be one of the stupidest proposals I've ever heard. This guy is probably thinking what's the worst thing that could happen, a 21 yr old and a gun don't mix. This ranks up there with the idiot in California that proposed a bill that we should stone gays to death because the bible says to. I'm curious as to what you think and if this is a good or bad idea?
Good or bad idea?
Representative Ron hood has proposed a bill that will allow any person over the age of 21 be permitted to own and handle a gun without any type of training or knowledge on using it safely. I do believe in the second amendment, but this kind of makes things even worse for everyone. Obviously the rule does not apply to convicts, but anyone who's not a felon and over the age of 21. I know this is technically a political issue, but it has nothing to do with republicans and democrats. The claim the guy made about getting this bill to the house is a single mom or dad can't pay for their training and permit. To that I say, how the hell can they afford the gun? Personally, this might be one of the stupidest proposals I've ever heard. This guy is probably thinking what's the worst thing that could happen, a 21 yr old and a gun don't mix. This ranks up there with the idiot in California that proposed a bill that we should stone gays to death because the bible says to. I'm curious as to what you think and if this is a good or bad idea?
Good or bad idea?
Re: Ohio house bill 147 your thoughts
It's mostly a political
It's mostly a political
Is there any gun law that the GOP doesn't want to loosen?
Re: Ohio house bill 147 your thoughts
good idea. And while there at it, what if someone doesn't have the money for driver's education? They should just let them buy the car and drive anyway. If they they accidentally kill someone with a car or a gun well hay $hit happens, it's their Constitutional rights by gawd.
Re: Ohio house bill 147 your thoughts
Terrible idea. People need how to oroperly use a lethal weapon and when the law applies to legally use it.
Terrible idea. People need how to oroperly use a lethal weapon and when the law applies to legally use it.
Re: Ohio house bill 147 your thoughts
I think it is a great idea. Maybe then all of the idiots will take each other out.
This is a good thing and conservatives shouldn't whine about it. Keep your mouth shut and when the next time comes around where we are accused of saying something racist, just point to these comments.
If I'm a "(addled GD moron", what does that make you. You are just like Cosby who got banned for his antics.
Are you trying to tell us that you aren't an ultra conservative (extremist) when you can't have an original thought unless it's right wing? Please, don't even attempt it.
He who joyfully marches to music rank and file, has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice. ~~~ Einstein
=============================================================================
Typically when you upset him with facts, he responds by insulting you. He's Cosby without the F-bombs which is why I have him on ignore. You should do the same.
I make no secret about being a Democrat but I have also recently criticized Clinton and pointed out some positives I've observed about Bush recently on here. I also cross over and vote for Republicans occasionally that I think are doing a good job. Bob Corker being one of them. I also think there is a lot to be said for John Kasich who will be entering the race soon. I just call em like I see em.
I see Defense and Chuckinden have gotten no less senile in my absence.
Seriously. Jeb Bush. Christ. If you even consider voting for him you should be executed.
Seriously. Jeb Bush. Christ. If you even consider voting for him you should be executed.
Not sure if it's been talked about, but the spot John Oliver did on the NSA and government surveilance was top notch.
After his global warming rant (that showed the same lack of understanding of the "study" as Defense so you know it's ignorant), I basically tuned him out as another radical lefty.
It's amazing that he was able to organize an interview with Snowden in Russia. Was interesting to see his brutal honesty with Snowden that no one in America really gives a shit about him, or what he did because they don't understand the issues (obviously the interviews were selectively edited).
"How does __________ program give the US government access to my dick pick."
Pretty sad that we're are really to that point as a country.
Can't wait until we reup on the sunsetting provisions of the Patriot Act this summer though.
After his global warming rant (that showed the same lack of understanding of the "study" as Defense so you know it's ignorant), I basically tuned him out as another radical lefty.
It's amazing that he was able to organize an interview with Snowden in Russia. Was interesting to see his brutal honesty with Snowden that no one in America really gives a shit about him, or what he did because they don't understand the issues (obviously the interviews were selectively edited).
"How does __________ program give the US government access to my dick pick."
Pretty sad that we're are really to that point as a country.
Can't wait until we reup on the sunsetting provisions of the Patriot Act this summer though.
Would love to see deee explain his evolution from passionately backing Perot and his govt spending views to working two Obama campaigns. Actually I wouldn't.
No apologies for smacking morons and liars. None.
The great thing about Jeb running is comparing the lukewarm response he is getting to the mindless fawning the left is giving Hillary fresh off her email debacle. Not crazy about any of the candidates or the process but it beats the hell out of the nauseating coronation and lying going on from the other side.
A Jeb-Hillary race is exactly what you get when fundraising abilities are the most important aspect of candidate.
Unless you find a third party candidate willing to spend $1B from his own coffers, we'll be getting more of the same for the foreseeable future
Unless you find a third party candidate willing to spend $1B from his own coffers, we'll be getting more of the same for the foreseeable future
So, we're sending warships to the Arabian Sea to stop Iran from arming the rebels in Yemen, and at the same time, negotiating a nuclear agreement with them?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/04/20/us-navy-stationing-aircraft-carrier-and-escort-ship-in-yemeni-waters-to/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/04/20/us-navy-stationing-aircraft-carrier-and-escort-ship-in-yemeni-waters-to/
Yep. That why I restate that we'll have a plethora of these comments in 100 years.
"Boy, WTF were those idiots thinking? Didn't they even know better? Were Americans really that GD stupid back in the late 20th/early 21st century? So let me get this straight, there were 330 million Americans in the U.S and they could only find a Bush or Clinton for nearly 3 decades? Were Americans retarded then? Why are are past Americans so uneducated?"
"Mommy, why is that person acting like the stupid, idiotic, moronic dumb asses who would vote for either a Bush or a Clinton?"
Warrior- We'll call it the Warrior/Willy Act of 2015 to save American Citizens from Stupid Decisions by threatening execution on them.
I don't think it's fair to call folks/posters "liars" because they're struggling with trying to find a politician to support that is addressing some aspect of what they find most important at a particular time. I've supported (at one time or another) a wide range of politicians from GHWB in his run in the primary against Reagan (who I despise above all things), Ross Perot, Bill Clinton, Pat Buchanan, Ron Paul, and a misguided venture in believing in Barack Obama.
I was willing to overlook a whole lot of what I did not agree with in Perot, Buchanan, and Paul because I felt they were the only voices out there addressing the dilution of our sovereignty. I wound up supporting Clinton as Perot sort of imploded and the Republican primary did such a hatchet job on Ron Paul that he was reduced to a stammering fool in trying to fend off their unrelenting attacks. Pat Buchanan really honed in on the dilution of our sovereignty and to this day is really good at addressing the issue and I always enjoy listening to him talk about it but then he lapses into a whole lot of other stuff that would be hard if not impossible to support on the tax side.
If there were a populist candidate that credibly supported the middle class with a strong message about the decline of US sovereignty to global interests and was not guaranteed to cater to minorities/poor nor pander to the rich then I would be highly interested in what they have to say as honestly the middle class is the only class in the US that never has a real candidate.
Problem is we are guaranteed to get a globalists no matter what happens and that means the middle class gets the shaft yet again. Doesn't matter if it's a Republican or Democrat. That is guaranteed.
I was willing to overlook a whole lot of what I did not agree with in Perot, Buchanan, and Paul because I felt they were the only voices out there addressing the dilution of our sovereignty. I wound up supporting Clinton as Perot sort of imploded and the Republican primary did such a hatchet job on Ron Paul that he was reduced to a stammering fool in trying to fend off their unrelenting attacks. Pat Buchanan really honed in on the dilution of our sovereignty and to this day is really good at addressing the issue and I always enjoy listening to him talk about it but then he lapses into a whole lot of other stuff that would be hard if not impossible to support on the tax side.
If there were a populist candidate that credibly supported the middle class with a strong message about the decline of US sovereignty to global interests and was not guaranteed to cater to minorities/poor nor pander to the rich then I would be highly interested in what they have to say as honestly the middle class is the only class in the US that never has a real candidate.
Problem is we are guaranteed to get a globalists no matter what happens and that means the middle class gets the shaft yet again. Doesn't matter if it's a Republican or Democrat. That is guaranteed.
^Also the two political parties now control the debates and the standard for allowing a 3rd party candidate to participate is that they most poll at least 15%. That's almost impossible unless, well unless they get into the debates. You couple that with the Citizens United decision and you have a system that is 100% rigged.
The Reform Party, The Tea Party, the Occupy Wallstreet movement all stem from citizens being fed up with being powerless, and allowing a small group of elitists to make all the decisions that effect our lives.
The media has recently made a big deal about the guy with the gyrocopter who landed on the capital lawn, they talk about his crimes and what should be done to him including being shot down, but none ever bother to mention the greater crimes being committed against the America people by those inside the building, whom his protest was directed. What he did was against the law, but so was the Boston Tea Party. I see public protest and action continuing to mount if nothing changes.
This post was edited on 4/20 5:58 PM by Deeeefense
The Reform Party, The Tea Party, the Occupy Wallstreet movement all stem from citizens being fed up with being powerless, and allowing a small group of elitists to make all the decisions that effect our lives.
The media has recently made a big deal about the guy with the gyrocopter who landed on the capital lawn, they talk about his crimes and what should be done to him including being shot down, but none ever bother to mention the greater crimes being committed against the America people by those inside the building, whom his protest was directed. What he did was against the law, but so was the Boston Tea Party. I see public protest and action continuing to mount if nothing changes.
This post was edited on 4/20 5:58 PM by Deeeefense
- Status
