Personally I think the title of the post is incorrect. It should be, “People In Absolute Shambles Are On Twitter”
OT: Twitter in Absolute Shambles
- Thread starter chasep23
- Start date
- Status
-"victim of censorship" sells/plays to the R base for sure...I'll give you that.
^that said: there was a slant to twitters "fact checking" and selective amplification for certain viewpointsas well as selective enforcement of rules that is indisputable.
He lost $34 billion in the deal. He’s lost $2 billion since the deal closed. I think a lot of us are just as smart and would also be capable of losing billions of we were in similar positions.
Yea. People thinking that Elon is going to lose everything and be on the street over this is crazy. If he goes through bankruptcy he will end up getting a deal on some of the loans or he'll lose a few billion dollars and sell twitter back off as a public co that is so broken that it can't be fixed.
Twitter was doing so damn well before Elon. The idea that someone could ruin Twitter was unfathomable. And, now this. Just proves that ANYTHING is possible.
Yes. Who amongst us hasn't created world changing payment technology, revolutionized space flight and electric vehicles, while also boring under LA?
When you pay $44 billion for something that is valued at $10 billion you lose $34 billion.
Yes. We didn’t have e-commerce, tunnels or space flight or electric cars before Elon.
Yeah. That’s why when he made his crap deal the board locked him in on it.
You are distorting his comment. He didn't claim Elon invented those things.
Right. They all existed and would have been improved upon with or without Elon’s “genius”.
You’re right though. It wasn’t straight up a loss because of paying too much for an asset. It also dragged down his Tesla stock he’d leveraged.
A genius doesn't lay off half his staff in blatant violation of state labor law then have to beg them back because he accidentally informed some people they were laid off when they weren't or because he needs skilled labor to do whatever it is he wants to do.
Not anywhere close to the amount of money Twitter has already lost in advertising and will lose in lawsuits that are going to come.
When you lay off half of your staff, you can't really afford to be forcing others to quit, especially when you're begging people to come back to work that you just laid off...
Always see you arguing a Liberal viewpoint and NEVER a conservative, yet you claim not to be biased. Funny! Pathetic and sad, but funny.
You’re right. He claimed he created them.
How is a bad business deal a liberal viewpoint to you? How propagandized have you been?
I’m not a Twitter person but seeing all these people like Boston and chroix lose it over this absolute nothing that matters in their life is highly entertaining.
Just fyi guys, everyone thinks you’re weirdo nerds.
Just fyi guys, everyone thinks you’re weirdo nerds.
I didn't. Read my post. My post was 100% accurate.
Surprised you couldn't see that considering you're just as smart as musk.
It doesn't even matter what the contracts say. California labor law says any large company that does mass layoffs has to provide a 60-day notice. They provided 0. It's as blatant of a violation of labor law as you'll get.
Anyone posting on a message board in 2022 is a weirdo nerd. Message boards are an internet antiquity designed for nerds.
Losing it lol. Your homies are losing it. I just stated some facts on a message board. And I’m pretty sure we’re all weirdo nerds right? Except for you?
Lol I know. That's why it's so incredibly amazing that you can't tell the difference between what was said and what you read.
The fact you claimed intelligence equal to musk is just cherry on top.
Musk didn’t even found Tesla. He bought his way in and forced the founders out. Just like any other venture capitalist in Silicon Valley who smells blood.
And Musk is not Tony Stark sitting in a cave with a box of scraps! He just is smart enough to hire intelligent engineers who can bring some of his ideas to life. Steve Jobs was the same way.
The difference is Steve Jobs didn’t claim he created the iPhone, the IPad or the Apple computer and didn’t have this cult of personality around him that Musk seems to have.
Good businessman for the most part, really good at selling others ideas as his own, shitty human being.
But I’m always going to be of the opinion that no one person should have that much wealth, power and influence. It’s bad for democracy. Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, George Soros…whoever. Way too much concentrated at the top.
And Musk is not Tony Stark sitting in a cave with a box of scraps! He just is smart enough to hire intelligent engineers who can bring some of his ideas to life. Steve Jobs was the same way.
The difference is Steve Jobs didn’t claim he created the iPhone, the IPad or the Apple computer and didn’t have this cult of personality around him that Musk seems to have.
Good businessman for the most part, really good at selling others ideas as his own, shitty human being.
But I’m always going to be of the opinion that no one person should have that much wealth, power and influence. It’s bad for democracy. Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, George Soros…whoever. Way too much concentrated at the top.
I’ll go head to head with him. You set it up and I’ll be there.
Just like George Washington was a soldier that fought some battles.
Michael Jordan was an athlete that played some games.
Marie Curie was a nurse that provided some medicine.
Julian Vanwinkle was a bootlegger that distilled some booze.
Adolph Rupp was a coach that won a few games.
Mother Theresa was a nun that helped some kids.
Barrack Obama was a politician that won an election.
John Lennon was a musician that wrote some songs...
- Status
Similar threads
