Or move the line back.The only way things will change is if they change the scoring to reduce the profit in a 2 vs a 3.
Or move the line back.The only way things will change is if they change the scoring to reduce the profit in a 2 vs a 3.
Or move the line back.
Moving the line made a huge difference to the game in the mid 1990's You went from Pat Riley like bully ball teams to an era of shooting dominance.I'm honestly not sure that would matter. Moving the line back would just create more space to guard, and offenses are picking defenses apart as it is. Shooters and offenses adapt - if they moved it back a foot at the top of the key (there isn't really space to increase the distance in the corners) they would still figure out a way to maximize efficiency IMO.
Moving the line made a huge difference to the game in the mid 1990's You went from Pat Riley like bully ball teams to an era of shooting dominance.
What the shortened NBA 3-point line of the mid-1990s says about the future of long-range shooting
For three years, the NBA managed to turn Steve Kerr into a legendwww.cbssports.com
It would make it easier to get 2’s ( I.e higher shooting percentage) and the the three point percentage would also have to go down some by virtue of the distance making the value proposition less than it currently is.I'm honestly not sure that would matter. Moving the line back would just create more space to guard, and offenses are picking defenses apart as it is. Shooters and offenses adapt - if they moved it back a foot at the top of the key (there isn't really space to increase the distance in the corners) they would still figure out a way to maximize efficiency IMO.
Curry is the best shooter I've seen in a long time but some of the old-timers (Bird, Miller, et al) could also shoot very, very well. I agree with another poster that Steph's game is basically hanging outside the arc and bomb. Seems like 70% of his shots are 3's. He is a marvelous ball handler and, generally, a good passer but his strength is the long ball. The few nights he's missing, he kills the team because he's going to take double digits bombs every night regardless. Plus, many times there is nobody under the basket for a rebound so, if he misses, it's basically a turnover. Now, to be fair, there are plenty of today's NBA players who do the same thing and aren't as good as Curry. But, that's today's NBA, unfortunately.
In a general sense, I find today's basketball very dreary to watch. Most games boil down to a 3-point shooting contest as you can be darn sure that both teams will jack up a ton of 3s with very few exceptions. Watching 6'-11" players throw up 4-7 3s a game is just painful to watch. Sure, Dirk Nowitski was great at it. Doesn't mean everyone his size should be shooting 3s. I can't remember the last time I watched a full quarter of NBA or college basketball. Several years ago every team played pick-and-roll isolation on a majority of trips down the floor and that was dreary, also. When I watch old YouTube videos of the Trailblazers when Walton was in his prime - THAT'S basketball to me. Inside, outside, backdoor cuts, spacing and movement to get open shots (not just 3s), etc. Watching one guy handle the ball and 4 guys camp out on the arc is just not interesting to me at all.
No NBA rule changes led to this current era of 3 point barrages. As shooters have just become better overall, the smart people in front offices realized that other than an uncontested layup, a 3 point shot is the most profitable option on offense. As more attention started to be paid to effective FG%, more offenses started focusing their philosophy around getting up as many threes as they can. Awarding 50% more points for a 3 vs a 2 simply makes it a no brainer nowadays.
The only way things will change is if they change the scoring to reduce the profit in a 2 vs a 3. Like say, change it to threes and fours. A 33% increase would create a situation where short and midrange jumpers and contested layups became more profitable than threes - unless the three was wide open.
Emphasis on lessening defense, along with freedom of the 3pt shooter to leg kick and body jump, has certainly helped, not to mention hand checks from defenders (although that wasn't as recent). The rules have already started swinging back and that has certainly affected some of the leagues better perimeter players this year. The offensive player has simply had too much freedom this decade.
I agree with (and HATE) the leg kick and jumping into defensive players. I’d say that only a handful of guys really did that much though. The game will continue to evolve and every team has analysts looking at every possible way to exploit advantages. 10 years from now the game may look different again.
The leg kick and jumping into the defender isn't a foul anymore, they'll even call the leg kick an offensive foul sometimes.Emphasis on lessening defense, along with freedom of the 3pt shooter to leg kick and body jump, has certainly helped, not to mention hand checks from defenders (although that wasn't as recent). The rules have already started swinging back and that has certainly affected some of the leagues better perimeter players this year. The offensive player has simply had too much freedom this decade.
The leg kick and jumping into the defender isn't a foul anymore, they'll even call the leg kick an offensive foul sometimes.
People will always find loopholes to the rules though. It’s kind of impossible to anticipate everything.Yeah that's kind of what my point was. The league swung the pendulum too far into the offensive end of things, and it's starting to come back. People don't want to watch a soft league where scores were getting into the 130-140 range, and they didn't want to see the offensive being SO protected, to the point where players started to exploit it.
I saw where LeBron moved into 10th place for all time steals last night. LeBron is now in the top 10 for career points, assists, steals and 3's made. Curry (34 in March) is outside of the top 50 of each of those except 3's. Curry will likely never crack the other top 10s as he trails LeBron and the other true GOAT candidates by such a wide margin. For instance, LeBron has 9,881 career assists vs Curry's 5,196. LeBron has 36,170 career points vs Curry's 19,372. Steals is 2,113 vs 1,332. I don't like LeBron but he has a case for GOAT. Curry, not so much.
There's more to scoring and shooting. He's defending better and impacts the game in so many ways that does not show up on the stat sheet. Don't worry, Klay is back so he has some help and his percentage will go to about 50% like normal (overall FG %).Curry has never made the all defensive team unlike the real GOAT candidates like LeBron, Jordan, etc. His stats don't compare well in other areas either. Chris Paul has more than double Curry's career assists. Steph will never get close to the top assist guys. Curry is even way behind guys like Mugsy Bogues (LOL) in assists. That doesn't sound like a GOAT to me. Curry has about half of Jordan's steal total and Michael missed four seasons in his prime. So Curry is simply the best three point shooter of all time who might crack the top 10 in scoring if he plays until he is 40 and continues to score 26 ppg.
As for titles, Curry has only won when surrounded by a team full of all stars and former all stars. We saw what Curry could do last year with only one of those guys on the team. GS didn't even make the playoffs.
Please, Curry is not getting better every year as his scoring is down 5 ppg this year and he is shooting a career worst 42% from the field.
Another stinker from Curry.. getting drubbed by 40 at the HALF!
Curry is the 4th best fantasy player on the year (was 1st for the first 2 months)..
..But he's just 23rd over the last 30 days
..And he's just 32nd over the last 14 days.
He's soon to be out of the running for an MVP if he doesn't find his game soon. And I think this firmly puts to bed any GOAT status (if not already).
Curry shot 37.5% from the field for the month of January.
Good thing I had Jakob freaking Poeltl last night, who out played Curry in fantasy as Curry did absolutely nothing in the 4th quarter.
Curry is on the verge of falling out of the top 10 for production this season. Which is probably where I'd put him in the rankings currently.. 8th.
Oh, if Zion and Dame come back he's 10th.
Not only does Steph have to play the role of Steph, but he has to play the role of Draymond Green, and they're still winning, and he's close to a double-double every night. What Steph is doing is MORE impressive, even though, his stats for fantasy may not be as high.
HE is currently ranked 2nd for the season on ESPN with a sizable lead on #3.Good thing I had Jakob freaking Poeltl last night, who out played Curry in fantasy as Curry did absolutely nothing in the 4th quarter.
Curry is on the verge of falling out of the top 10 for production this season. Which is probably where I'd put him in the rankings currently.. 8th.
Oh, if Zion and Dame come back he's 10th.
HE is currently ranked 2nd for the season on ESPN with a sizable lead on #3.
Ranked 2nd in the fantasy rankings.Ranked 2nd in what?
He had a great November and December, and has dropped off, considerably, since then.
I know fantasy stats aren't the best metric for this... but he's now 8th on the year in production. He was as high as #1 when the season opened. But he's been dropping off steadily as the season rolls on, which tells me the last two months have been pretty bad (I recall at one point he was on a 30-day slump that had him in the late 20's).
Seems to me that he's a player that's great when he has other pieces around him, but he can't carry a team like Lebron, MJ or Kobe could..
Ranked 2nd in the fantasy rankings.
Steph continues to amaze, putting on a show for the ages. 15 threes in three quarters, and 13 threes in 16 minutes! He hit 12 threes from 30 feet and further. I know this is an all-star game, but he had 50 points (and would have had more under the old rules), and would have likely hit 20 or so threes. Put some respect to his name. GOAT performance tonight!