ADVERTISEMENT

Noticed that Cal was in Brooklyn today...

Just to rub it in...

Idc what K did for 20something years, tbh. Duke is well behind us. UNC, behind us. That's understood.

We slipped for a good while before Cal resurrected us, and since then Duke has somehow managed to get 2 titles. How in the world? Idk. K certainly "adapted" to 1 n done, finally embraced "ruining college basketball". I don't like that. We should have more titles than both Duke and UNC during this special Cal run, and maybe we will once he's done. Who knows. NCAA tournament is a crude bitch, and I'm just tickled to have a legit shot almost every season. But I'd be lying if I said I was not jealous of Duke and UNCs recent success. It just doesn't add up to me. If we played those teams in yearly series I am confident we would own them bc we have the superior talent.

That's not complaining, that's just real stubborn sports fan talk. I won't give UNC or Duke credit and I won't accept that they are ahead in the most recent decade. It's BS. Just look at the NBA. Cal's guys are everywhere, and where are the dukies/heels? Idk, they suck compared to us. It just doesn't add up.

And it burns Cal up, too. That WVU 2010 loss haunts him like it does us. Wisconsin. UNC. Ball bounces a couple different ways and it's a totally different picture. Those lucky SOBs.

And quit that PC holier than thou sports fan talk. It's sports.

/rant

Hell, even stupid UL has one. What in the world. I know Cal won't leave till he trumps that skunk weasel.

Thank God I'm not the only one.
 
Sometimes I leave this board for a much needed break.

Then, I come back and read thru threads like this one and I don't think I am exaggerating at all here by saying that the level of retard actually gives me a headache. Some of you actually give me a headache with your stupidity. Didn't think that was possible.

Sorry to be blunt. But it is the hard truth. Some of you clearly have trouble with even a modicum of rational thought. Honestly, I hope that you are trolling. That would actually be a relief.

Anyone who believes for a second some of the idiocy that is spouted here should really consider not procreating in order to spare the rest of us.

Had to be said. Now, continue telling all of us how big of a failure Cal has been since he has been at UK. Tell us all how he doesn't care about winning or championships.

The rest of us will point and laugh. And you deserve to be mocked and ridiculed for your utter stupidity.

/Rant

All that just to say Cal might value more than titles at this point in his career?

Honest to God, And I've said this many times, I always thought Cal was the most competitive SOB alive. Back in the mid 2,000's I attended a closed memphis practice and watched him destroy Antonio Anderson and Another time Jeremy Hunt. I love seeing players get pounded by coaches, but man this was nearly Bob Knight type insanity. I knew then he was big time. That's why I laugh at the PC crowd around here that say CAL WOULD NEVER!!!!!! Lol.

After seeing Cal get older, and the way he speaks, I'm not so sure anymore if he's AS hungry for championships as he once was. Shoot me.

He's also not the guy with a chip on his shoulder anymore imo. He's part of the club today. Maybe that's taken some edge off.

Pitino wanted that second ring so bad he was willing to sell hookers to students to get it. Don't want to go that far, but someone wondering if Cal is more concerned with having 100 in the NBA or 10 titles isn't an extreme question right now.

Hopefully Cal is so great, it won't matter which he prefers. He'll win regardless, and so far that's the only guarantee.
 
We have a great coach who is doing his best for one of ours .
Whether he plays next year for us or the NBA ; we are blessed to have a coach who truly cares about these young men and their families !
 
All that just to say Cal might value more than titles at this point in his career?

Honest to God, And I've said this many times, I always thought Cal was the most competitive SOB alive. Back in the mid 2,000's I attended a closed memphis practice and watched him destroy Antonio Anderson and Another time Jeremy Hunt. I love seeing players get pounded by coaches, but man this was nearly Bob Knight type insanity. I knew then he was big time. That's why I laugh at the PC crowd around here that say CAL WOULD NEVER!!!!!! Lol.

After seeing Cal get older, and the way he speaks, I'm not so sure anymore if he's AS hungry for championships as he once was. Shoot me.

He's also not the guy with a chip on his shoulder anymore imo. He's part of the club today. Maybe that's taken some edge off.

Pitino wanted that second ring so bad he was willing to sell hookers to students to get it. Don't want to go that far, but someone wondering if Cal is more concerned with having 100 in the NBA or 10 titles isn't an extreme question right now.

Hopefully Cal is so great, it won't matter which he prefers. He'll win regardless, and so far that's the only guarantee.

You make a very reasonable argument.

I just happen to disagree.

You take away all the Swaggy Cal persona, which includes all this draft night players school bullshit, and you get to the core of Cal. The same bulldog that ripped Antonio Andersons ass wide.

Guys like Cal and Pitino and K don't change. If they do, they retire. Cal came here to wins championships, as you stated. Winning one is not good enough. Watch him on the sidelines. He wants it more than the players most times.

He says what he has to to get the players. He needs the players to win 'ships. That is why he does what he does---to win. Period.

AJMHO of course. TIFWIW.
 
  • Like
Reactions: morgousky
You make a very reasonable argument.

I just happen to disagree.

You take away all the Swaggy Cal persona, which includes all this draft night players school bullshit, and you get to the core of Cal. The same bulldog that ripped Antonio Andersons ass wide.

Guys like Cal and Pitino and K don't change. If they do, they retire. Cal came here to wins championships, as you stated. Winning one is not good enough. Watch him on the sidelines. He wants it more than the players most times.

He says what he has to to get the players. He needs the players to win 'ships. That is why he does what he does---to win. Period.

AJMHO of course. TIFWIW.

That's what I've always believed as well. I think the " Cal loves the children" crowd is just getting to me. Posters with no ability to distinguish between coach speak, recruiting pitches, and the core of him as you stated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atrain7732
I agree with the sentiment it averages out to one a decade, but have we ever had this much assemblance of talent? Or has anyone for that matter had that much talent in a span of time?

I'm still more than content with Cal's tenure. I've never been more in love with college basketball but we have had some STACKED teams. And I know we've been off by a couple plays of winning 1 maybe 2 more in his time here.
So maybe we could recruit 3 star players and you would be happy. No one would expect final fours and titles.
 
It will all be moot if Cal wins another title. That's what his legacy will come down to at this point.

And then there will still be a large portion of the fan base that would still complain. "All he needs is just one more title!"..."how did Cal only manage two title with all that talent?!"
 
That's what I've always believed as well. I think the " Cal loves the children" crowd is just getting to me. Posters with no ability to distinguish between coach speak, recruiting pitches, and the core of him as you stated.

I hear ya man. Honestly, that BS gets to me sometimes as well. But, when it does, I just try and take it for what it is.

You have always been fair to Cal and his system from what I have seen. My post was not directed at you, more to the people who sit around and wait to pounce on Cal for some perceived slight or error.
 
That's what I've always believed as well. I think the " Cal loves the children" crowd is just getting to me. Posters with no ability to distinguish between coach speak, recruiting pitches, and the core of him as you stated.

He's the same guy at the core, but he realized a long time ago that being consumed by nothing but wins would kill him.

So he developed this players first mantra, believing that the wins would follow from putting others ahead of himself.

But he ain't Gandhi. And there are times when he is going to spin a position until it fits his philosophy. Then he goes to mass every day and prays about it.

I do believe that making the Hall took a little edge off of him. And my gut tells me that he could retire without another ring and be at peace with it. Which is probably not what you want to hear.

But I still think he gets one or two more. I'm optimistic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: morgousky
Some are questioning whether Cal is pushing Diallo to the Nets. Why would he push a guy to the league that most are projecting as a borderline first round pick? Isn't he better served to play a year and improve his draft status - potentially into the lottery? We are talking a difference in millions over the first 3 years.
#10 pick - 2.14m
#30 pick - 976k
Okay, so explain Bam's decision than.
 
Okay, so explain Bam's decision than.

Bam has one ingredient to his profile that Diallo is missing. He's already played 38 games vs. D-1 competition.

The NBA thinks they know who he is, and they are willing to pay a premium to get him now instead of a year from now.

If Bam returns and is the same player, he might fall out of the draft completely.

Diallo has no games vs. top competition. If he performs well against a college schedule next season, he could make a huge leap.

And yes, Bam could have played great and improved next year. Not saying he couldn't. Just that Diallo is more of an unknown with more upside. Bam is more of a known with more downside.
 
Bam has one ingredient to his profile that Diallo is missing. He's already played 38 games vs. D-1 competition.

The NBA thinks they know who he is, and they are willing to pay a premium to get him now instead of a year from now.

If Bam returns and is the same player, he might fall out of the draft completely.

Diallo has no games vs. top competition. If he performs well against a college schedule next season, he could make a huge leap.

And yes, Bam could have played great and improved next year. Not saying he couldn't. Just that Diallo is more of an unknown with more upside. Bam is more of a known with more downside.
Bam, as a sophomore, with some shooting work, would definitely be a higher pick than he is now, especially in, what we believe, will be a weaker draft in 18.

Looks to me like he could slip to the second round this year and, to me, why would you leave if you are anything but a definite first rounder?

I've said it a hundred times on here, I love Cal, but he "encourages" guys to leave to make room for new guys, when they could come back and benefit themselves AND UK.

So many on here tell me, and others, that we are being selfish because we want what's best for UK and not the kids, but, in my opinion, why is it bad for a kid like Bam to return when he could end up in the second round. Come back and take another shot at getting a first round pick, especially when it's well known that the next draft is going to feature a lot less talent.

Just seems to me like UK is playing second fiddle to the NBA and not only did we push Bam out the door, but we didn't get the guy that we pushed him out for.

Makes no sense to me.
 
Bam, as a sophomore, with some shooting work, would definitely be a higher pick than he is now, especially in, what we believe, will be a weaker draft in 18.
Looks to me like he could slip to the second round this year and, to me, why would you leave if you are anything but a definite first rounder? I've said it a hundred times on here, I love Cal, but he "encourages" guys to leave to make room for new guys, when they could come back and benefit themselves AND UK.
So many on here tell me, and others, that we are being selfish because we want what's best for UK and not the kids, but, in my opinion, why is it bad for a kid like Bam to return when he could end up in the second round. Come back and take another shot at getting a first round pick, especially when it's well known that the next draft is going to feature a lot less talent.
Just seems to me like UK is playing second fiddle to the NBA and not only did we push Bam out the door, but we didn't get the guy that we pushed him out for.
Makes no sense to me.

I think Cal and UK were sure they were going to get Bamba. IMO a frosh Bamba is a better fit than a soph Bam in terms of talent and fit into the offense/defense. Unfortunately for UK and Cal they struck out there. So if the strategy was in fact to "push out" Bam to make room for Bamba it was a grave miscalculation this time around
 
  • Like
Reactions: kyjeff1
I think Cal and UK were sure they were going to get Bamba. IMO a frosh Bamba is a better fit than a soph Bam in terms of talent and fit into the offense/defense. Unfortunately for UK and Cal they struck out there. So if the strategy was in fact to "push out" Bam to make room for Bamba it was a grave miscalculation this time around
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
Bam = the bird in the hand.

He was a known commodity, a guy that, with a little work, could have made UK a legit contender next year. I just don't see how they are a contender now.

I know Cal is, by far, the best recruiter there has ever been, but even he can't predict what these kids will do.

We all thought UK was getting Bamba, thought we were getting Jared Allen too, but missed on those guys as well as other sure bets over the years.

To me, the smart decision, if UK's success is the goal, is to hang on to your bird in hand when you know he isn't a sure fire first rounder.
 
Bam, as a sophomore, with some shooting work, would definitely be a higher pick than he is now, especially in, what we believe, will be a weaker draft in 18.

Looks to me like he could slip to the second round this year and, to me, why would you leave if you are anything but a definite first rounder?

I've said it a hundred times on here, I love Cal, but he "encourages" guys to leave to make room for new guys, when they could come back and benefit themselves AND UK.

So many on here tell me, and others, that we are being selfish because we want what's best for UK and not the kids, but, in my opinion, why is it bad for a kid like Bam to return when he could end up in the second round. Come back and take another shot at getting a first round pick, especially when it's well known that the next draft is going to feature a lot less talent.

Just seems to me like UK is playing second fiddle to the NBA and not only did we push Bam out the door, but we didn't get the guy that we pushed him out for.

Makes no sense to me.

You asked a question and I tried to answer it.

Bam is more of a known quantity. The NBA thinks they know what he is because they've seen him. Yes, he could get better. But if he doesn't, he will drop. He also doesn't have freakish measurables to up his stock.

Diallo is a freak but they don't really know if he can play yet. So the variance of where he might go is wider.

I don't know the particulars of the conversations between Cal and Bam. I don't know Bam's family situation or how badly he wants/needs to start getting paid. I don't know what he's been told by teams or where he will be drafted. Maybe you know all of that stuff.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT