Amen.Also in a team sport one player doesn't win or lose a game.
Amen.Also in a team sport one player doesn't win or lose a game.
Did he mention the decades-long UNC scandal?
I hope all the players on both teams are eligible and healthy. I want the best matchup possible and think this game will certainly deliver. In a perfect world, neither fanbase will have an excuse when the final buzzer sounds.
I don't think anyone knows exactly what took place, but I just can't see the NCAA penalizing Skal with a whole season. There COULD be enough there that he's gotta sit out a few games. However, why don't people understand this is nothing like the Kanter situation? The Kanter situation wasn't subjective when it came to WHAT the wrongdoing was. The subjective part was how they treated that money changing hands.
Furthermore, the Kanter ruling, now that we know all the facts, was NOT a screw job to UK. Where many fans get frustrated is, there have been other foreign players in similar circumstances who broke the same rules, but played college ball. The determining factor in the Kanter situation was HOW MUCH money was taken, not that a rule was broken. Plenty of players break the rules. Festus Ezeil broke the rules at Vandy, he was suspended a few games. John Wall broke the rules in high school, he sat out a few games. These weren't as severe because the amount wasn't considered enough to warrant it.
I wish the NCAA would put the rules in context. Make it a dollar figure and pre-determine the punishment. If you receive more than "x amount", you're ineligible. Anything under, you're suspended for this many games. Instead, they take every case by itself and this means they have no governing document to check and balance their rulings.
Ditto.Mark, you are a good poster. While I look forward to slamming some good stuff down your throat, you are a good guy.
After the season starts please don't expect me to be nice. Understand?![]()
You should look over that case again. It was a massive screw job. Kanter's father meticulously kept records of everything the family was reimbursed for from the pro team he played for. His dad did everything he could to maintain his sons eligibility, but he made a mistake. You are absolutely right that it was about the amount of money. But do you remember how much of that money was used? Not one single cent of it. They offered to pay it back in full, it was untouched, it would have been no problem. The NCAA chose to view it as a black and white matter, when it was clearly a grey area.
I don't think anyone knows exactly what took place, but I just can't see the NCAA penalizing Skal with a whole season. There COULD be enough there that he's gotta sit out a few games. However, why don't people understand this is nothing like the Kanter situation? The Kanter situation wasn't subjective when it came to WHAT the wrongdoing was. The subjective part was how they treated that money changing hands.
Furthermore, the Kanter ruling, now that we know all the facts, was NOT a screw job to UK. Where many fans get frustrated is, there have been other foreign players in similar circumstances who broke the same rules, but played college ball. The determining factor in the Kanter situation was HOW MUCH money was taken, not that a rule was broken. Plenty of players break the rules. Festus Ezeil broke the rules at Vandy, he was suspended a few games. John Wall broke the rules in high school, he sat out a few games. These weren't as severe because the amount wasn't considered enough to warrant it.
I wish the NCAA would put the rules in context. Make it a dollar figure and pre-determine the punishment. If you receive more than "x amount", you're ineligible. Anything under, you're suspended for this many games. Instead, they take every case by itself and this means they have no governing document to check and balance their rulings.
Maybe I'm remembering incorrectly, but I thought the Enes situation had more to do with how the money was paid to the Kanters........maybe it should have gone directly to the school?
But does the money being spent or not really matter? Say a recruit gets a car as compensation. Is it not a violation if he gives the car back? I was not aware they hadn't touched the money, but I believe the amount of money was $33,000(?) and deemed to be excessive. Thus, the ruling of ineligible.
My point was, receiving payment as a professional should be strictly defined by the NCAA. If you're an international player competing before you're 18, it should be distinctly publicized what the amount it. Same with a normal recruit. Obviously every recruit taking $50 shouldn't mean they are ineligible, but the amounts should be defined.
Player A can receive $900 in the form of plane tickets and hotel comps...suspended 3 games.
Player B can receive $1200 cash...suspended 5 games.
Player C can receive $33000 in compensation...ineligible.
That's the frustrating part. And because of the subjectivity, any time a UK recruit even has a sniff of a rumor about taking even a free pizza and soda, I'm concerned, because the NCAA could drop the hammer (or completely ignore things, like UNC) at their own will and there's not a damn thing anyone can do about it. For a recruit, by time any legal action would be completed, their Freshman season would be over with anyway.
Say he's ineligible, someone like Skal could sue the NCAA and even if he won, he'd never suit up for UK anyway.
noThis scares me. Would he have any knowledge of the situation?
Only Colin Cowherd afaik. Perhaps not so coincidentally he no longer works for ESPN.
Dukie V is POS and nothing else. Do you all remember what he said about the KY fans, Enough said.
I agree. Until he plays that first game, I will be nervous too, given the NCAA's history of sticking it to UK. However, I am pretty optimistic, since Cal is. Sandy Bell is pretty diligent, and they hired two ex-NCAA compliance people to work under her. I am sure they did a lot of investigation on Skal, and would not have taken his commitment if there had been any doubts.
People tend to forget/ignore stuff like this,evidently cheating at UNC can go on forever but a basketball to mark Cal's 50th win must be dealt with swiftly.The NCAA has a double or triple standard,one for Duke and UNC, one for UK and one for most other college programs.As long as Emmert is there that is likely to be the case.Talking about Kanter...what really ticked me off is that he originally committed to Washington in 2009, and there didn't seem to be a problem there. But when he de committed in 2010 and decided to come to UK....it all went south. Mark Emmert was President at the University of Washington until October 2010. He took over as NCAA president in November and Kanter was ruled ineligible in January 2011.
Adding in a few other factors...Terrence Jones de committing from UW, Emmert admitting they target certain school so/individuals and the NCAA's ridiculous inconsistencies....I have to think the ruling was a personal grudge...at least to an extent. Alex Len was paid for playing club ball, it wasn't even for schooling and all he got was a 10 game suspension.
Just my opinion
We also have a Senior captain in Amile Jefferson, who completely shut down Frank Kaminsky in the title game. Considering Kaminsky was the NPOY and gave pretty much every team fits, I think other teams would be well advised not to overlook Jefferson's influence on the defensive end.
Hi Mark. I love THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL. Plus I love Dickie V love for college BB, HAVE A BLESSED DAY my friend. SMILEBingo. As much as he praises Duke, and as a Duke fan I will not deny that at all, very little is ever made about how he goes on and on and on about Roy Williams and UNC.
I saw this thread and was worried. Then I actually read his tweets exactly as they were stated and it's nothing to see here, please disperse.
The NCAA does not have it out for UK. The Kanter ruling was BS, but other than that we have been given a lot of leeway. Remember Tarkanian's line "The NCAA is so mad at Kentucky they just gave Cleveland State two more years of probation"???? The Herald Leader did a story quoting several ex players, all of whom admitted to receiving free meals and stuff from boosters while at UK. The NCAA gave us a slap on the wrist. It wasn't until the Emery thing where there was physical proof (although many say it was planted) that they decided to come down on us. They could have given us the death penalty. Many suggested they should. We got two years of probation, vacated TWO victories, and within four years we were back in the Final Four.
Please stop with the "NCAA hates Kentucky" stuff.
Dickie V says on Twitter that we should be nervous about Skal's eligibility.
ESPN needs to put Dickie to pasture real soon like Lou Holtz.
People tend to forget/ignore stuff like this,evidently cheating at UNC can go on forever but a basketball to mark Cal's 50th win must be dealt with swiftly.The NCAA has a double or triple standard,one for Duke and UNC, one for UK and one for most other college programs.As long as Emmert is there that is likely to be the case.
Why do you post this nonsense on every board? If you're not trying to come across as a lunatic, you're doing a terrible job.Hi Mark. I love THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL. Plus I love Dickie V love for college BB, HAVE A BLESSED DAY my friend. SMILE
!!!!!!!!!!!! GO ROY & STAFF !!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!! GO TAR HEELS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah, and Amile didn't guard him until down the stretch when Jahili was in foul trouble. There is a reason Kaminsky wasn't a factor the last 10 minutes of the game, and it was Amile. I'm not the only one who noticed this:Dude, Frank had 21 pts and 12 reb....he's the only reason Wisc was in the game. WTF are you talking about?
I won't claim to know anything about Skal's situation since I don't, but don't take Dickie V seriously. Perhaps he was once a decent guy back around the 80s or so to have on during broadcasts, but he's just an insufferable bald idiot these days. If ESPN were smart, they'd limit his broadcasts to Jimmy V week (he does a nice job bringing awareness to this cause) and give him 5 minutes a week on SportsCenter during college basketball season.
Free will my brother, have a BLESSED DAYWhy do you post this nonsense on every board? If you're not trying to come across as a lunatic, you're doing a terrible job.
Yeah, and Amile didn't guard him until down the stretch when Jahili was in foul trouble. There is a reason Kaminsky wasn't a factor the last 10 minutes of the game, and it was Amile. I'm not the only one who noticed this:
http://collegebasketball.ap.org/word1063/article/jeffersons-defense-big-factor-dukes-win
You're totally right. Towns and WCS were the reason Jefferson shut down Kaminsky down the stretch.Or the fact he had played against 3 top 10 NBA picks (Towns, WCS, Okafor) for 2 straight games....I'm sure fatigue had nothing to do with that.