Needless to say, I hope his first team with Lively at center flops.This will continue until Nike doesn't think it's worth sending people to Scheyer for whatever reason.
Needless to say, I hope his first team with Lively at center flops.This will continue until Nike doesn't think it's worth sending people to Scheyer for whatever reason.
Vince Taylor, more recently, played for Lexington Tates Creek and starred at Duke.Remember the time Duke took Jeff Mullins right out of Lexington LaFayette High School. He didn't give UK a second thought.
Now his situation was a little different because he was a New Yorker whose daddy had been transferred down to Lexington with IBM. Still he snubbed. He became an All American at Duke
The point is that Kentucky does not wade through the same waters of commonality with those other 350 programs. Calipari has specifically and intentionally placed our program on a pedestal, and used very specific terminology to do it. With such sentiments being shared on a public setting, about how UK is the "gold standard", and how he's here because he can "recruit the best of the best", you'd actually think that we'd beat Duke more than 15% of the time for elite recruits, right?Who said that? I didn’t say that. I said Duke was kicking everyone’s butt.
Cal's getting owned by a kid half his age, who has yet to actually coach his own team.They’ll fall apart with Scheyer, right?
Nice post! Better than a lot of pieces by paid journalists.Duke has now beaten us for 17 out of the last 20 head-to-heads for top 10 RSCI guys. That's an 85% success rate on their end, and a 15% success rate on our end.
In 2017, Calipari started taking open shots at Duke's recruiting pitch. By the spring of 2018, he was openly mocking them and ended up calling them out three or four times publicly in a three year period.
Despite all of Calipari's deflection and excuse making, it's more than "Nike helps them", although that's part of it (and a huge part). Duke is outselling their program against Kentucky.
This stuff started way back in 2009 when we were going after Kyrie. Calipari was at his absolute zenith, and he had Rod Strickland on the staff, who is Kyrie's freaking literal godfather. He also had Wall coming in, and had just sent Evans and Rose to the NBA as #4 and #1 picks, respectively (both won rookie of the year in their NBA debut seasons).
So here was Cal, recruiting Kyrie, and offering Nike support, the keys to the Kentucky point guard kingdom, and a chance to play on the largest stage in the country (the Kentucky brand was better than the Duke brand at that moment, particularly when Kyrie committed to Duke while Wall and Cousins were bringing waves of newfound hype to Lexington and Duke was the under-the-radar, eventual national champion that season).
So why did Kyrie wade through all the fully galvanized Calipari pitch, only to pick Duke at the end? Nike was supporting both programs. Cal's point guard record was the hottest discussion in college hoops. He also had Strickland to dangle in front of Kyrie's family.
So what was it? It ended up being that Duke had a better pitch for players who saw themselves (or wanted to see themselves) as more than the next kid on the NBA fast track. They sold Kyrie on Duke being everything Kentucky was - fast track to the NBA, brightest spotlight, etc. - only doing it on a more superior, elite way. Duke even went so far as to begin poaching everything we did well - "brotherhood" instead of "la familia"; pro day; fully embracing OAD, etc. All we were left with when the smoke cleared was a lesser version of Duke's pitch. They offered academics, future connections provided by university affiliation, and a connection to a real legacy centered around a head coach. Kentucky, under Cal, was only offering the quick ticket to the NBA, and the best possible training for the NBA. When recruits began to question if UK was really the best possible place for player development when compared to Duke, suddenly all of Calipari's best pitches had been thrown, while K was still fine-tuning new ones.
By the time we get to Jabari Parker's recruitment in 2012ish, Coach K's pitch was expanding. Jabari even said he didn't like the way UK was portraying the OAD setting, and came across as if it was all about the NBA with Calipari. Parker, and clearly other kids like Kyrie, wanted more, and their parents wanted more. They wanted the OAD elitism, without the OAD stigma. They wanted the reality of NBA fast-track, but wanted to do it from an elite college academic environment where their parents could pretend their son was bettering himself academically, professionally, and in terms of having future connection through the Duke "set for life" approach.
It worked. By November of 2013, Tyus Jones and Okafor both chose Duke over Kentucky. Winslow followed suit just a few months later.
Since then, Duke has beaten Kentucky for 17 out of 20 top ten guys. While we've been mocking their players and their pitch on the "set for life" angle, few of us have really heard what the players are actually saying. They've literally been telling us the same thing over and over again: they prefer what Duke is pitching to them more than what Kentucky is pitching to them.
Instead of mocking them, maybe Calipari should start listening to them and start selling recruits on everything our state and program can offer besides and beyond the NBA.
You and some others keep screeching, "It's Nike!" What other school has a contract with Nike? What other coach was having players funneled to him while at Memphis and early on at Kentucky through individuals like World Wide Wes?Nice spin as usual. Dude, it's Nike & other connections. Duke staff literally doesn't have to do hardly a thing. You forget Duke's recruiting was very mediocre until a sudden change. The sudden change was Nike going all in for Coach K. Now that Coach K is retired, at Coach K's request they've pulled out all the stops to make sure Sheyer has a banging first couple of classes to get him going.
If you think it's simply about a pitch you're totally gullible & completely subjective, blinded by you're anti-Cal rants. Cal deserves his criticisms but not on this. His hands are tied.
BTW, since Nolan Smith was the lead recruiter Louisville will be a test if it's just about how great of a recruiter he is. Jeff Caple not having very good success recruiting. We'll see if Smith pulls 3-4, 5-stars per year at UL. And all he has to do is replicate the same approach....BUT, BUT one thing will be missing that he has at Duke: Daddy Nike
EDIT: BTW, all that Elite talent since 2015 & zero championships...finally first final 4 since Nike funneling the elites to Duke.
I still expect them to fall apart even with all that talent….did anybody watch the Wake Forest game this year where K got sick at half time? Scheyer was a disaster and the players openly ignored his coaching.They’ll fall apart with Scheyer, right?
If anything, Cal has proved that if you throw enough talent at it, you don’t have to be much of an in-game coach. But I expect them to struggle in the tourney unless they return guys. You’re just not winning a championship with 1&done freshmen.I still expect them to fall apart even with all that talent….did anybody watch the Wake Forest game this year where K got sick at half time? Scheyer was a disaster and the players openly ignored his coaching.
The last part is fair, but I don't think there's anything Cal can do now to compete with Duke and Nike.You and some others keep screeching, "It's Nike!" What other school has a contract with Nike? What other coach was having players funneled to him while at Memphis and early on at Kentucky through individuals like World Wide Wes?
Who burned that bridge with Nike?
And how long ago was that? Also really random to throw Harrelson in that group. Also, I’ve hung out a ton with Tubby/BCG/Cal players. Believe what ya want.
Of course Nolan Smith isn't going to do as well at Louisville, they have all kinds of internal, financial problems. I'm so sick of people blaming our recruiting problems on Nike. The problem is, these top recruits see what kind of abysmal 1990's style BB we play and don't want to come here. We rarely beat good teams, and have a screaming Psychopath on the sidelines that screams at his players, assistant coaches and referees the whole game. I think those are the REAL problems.Nice spin as usual. Dude, it's Nike & other connections. Duke staff literally doesn't have to do hardly a thing. You forget Duke's recruiting was very mediocre until a sudden change. The sudden change was Nike going all in for Coach K. Now that Coach K is retired, at Coach K's request they've pulled out all the stops to make sure Sheyer has a banging first couple of classes to get him going.
If you think it's simply about a pitch you're totally gullible & completely subjective, blinded by you're anti-Cal rants. Cal deserves his criticisms but not on this. His hands are tied.
BTW, since Nolan Smith was the lead recruiter Louisville will be a test if it's just about how great of a recruiter he is. Jeff Caple not having very good success recruiting. We'll see if Smith pulls 3-4, 5-stars per year at UL. And all he has to do is replicate the same approach....BUT, BUT one thing will be missing that he has at Duke: Daddy Nike
EDIT: BTW, all that Elite talent since 2015 & zero championships...finally first final 4 since Nike funneling the elites to Duke.
Vince Taylor, more recently, played for Lexington Tates Creek and starred at Duke.
His Father was a professor at UK.
Remember the time Duke took Jeff Mullins right out of Lexington LaFayette High School. He didn't give UK a second thought.
Now his situation was a little different because he was a New Yorker whose daddy had been transferred down to Lexington with IBM. Still he snubbed. He became an All American at Duke
You and some others keep screeching, "It's Nike!" What other school has a contract with Nike? What other coach was having players funneled to him while at Memphis and early on at Kentucky through individuals like World Wide Wes?
Who burned that bridge with Nike?
Of course Nolan Smith isn't going to do as well at Louisville, they have all kinds of internal, financial problems. I'm so sick of people blaming our recruiting problems on Nike. The problem is, these top recruits see what kind of abysmal 1990's style BB we play and don't want to come here. We rarely beat good teams, and have a screaming Psychopath on the sidelines that screams at his players, assistant coaches and referees the whole game. I think those are the REAL problems.
This is a really good article about what has happened. It is very obvious that Calipari is mostly about getting players to the league than caring about what’s best for UK basketball. I dare say that every player that comes to UK has going to the NBA after only one year on their mind. Many players do leave even though they don’t appear ready. (However, some do better as pros than they did with Calipari coaching them.). Now several leave after only one year and go elsewhere. Why? Some think it’s great that Duke gets all of these five star players, but how many championships have their freshmen won? Zion’s team? This year’s team? We also know that none of these players will stay longer than a year just like past years. Duke will need to go through building a new roster every year. Freshman teams don’t win national titles. I’d rather get one or two top players and some others that will be foundation players for 2 or 3 years. Experience wins championships, not freshmen by themselves.Duke has now beaten us for 17 out of the last 20 head-to-heads for top 10 RSCI guys. That's an 85% success rate on their end, and a 15% success rate on our end.
In 2017, Calipari started taking open shots at Duke's recruiting pitch. By the spring of 2018, he was openly mocking them and ended up calling them out three or four times publicly in a three year period.
Despite all of Calipari's deflection and excuse making, it's more than "Nike helps them", although that's part of it (and a huge part). Duke is outselling their program against Kentucky.
This stuff started way back in 2009 when we were going after Kyrie. Calipari was at his absolute zenith, and he had Rod Strickland on the staff, who is Kyrie's freaking literal godfather. He also had Wall coming in, and had just sent Evans and Rose to the NBA as #4 and #1 picks, respectively (both won rookie of the year in their NBA debut seasons).
So here was Cal, recruiting Kyrie, and offering Nike support, the keys to the Kentucky point guard kingdom, and a chance to play on the largest stage in the country (the Kentucky brand was better than the Duke brand at that moment, particularly when Kyrie committed to Duke while Wall and Cousins were bringing waves of newfound hype to Lexington and Duke was the under-the-radar, eventual national champion that season).
So why did Kyrie wade through all the fully galvanized Calipari pitch, only to pick Duke at the end? Nike was supporting both programs. Cal's point guard record was the hottest discussion in college hoops. He also had Strickland to dangle in front of Kyrie's family.
So what was it? It ended up being that Duke had a better pitch for players who saw themselves (or wanted to see themselves) as more than the next kid on the NBA fast track. They sold Kyrie on Duke being everything Kentucky was - fast track to the NBA, brightest spotlight, etc. - only doing it on a more superior, elite way. Duke even went so far as to begin poaching everything we did well - "brotherhood" instead of "la familia"; pro day; fully embracing OAD, etc. All we were left with when the smoke cleared was a lesser version of Duke's pitch. They offered academics, future connections provided by university affiliation, and a connection to a real legacy centered around a head coach. Kentucky, under Cal, was only offering the quick ticket to the NBA, and the best possible training for the NBA. When recruits began to question if UK was really the best possible place for player development when compared to Duke, suddenly all of Calipari's best pitches had been thrown, while K was still fine-tuning new ones.
By the time we get to Jabari Parker's recruitment in 2012ish, Coach K's pitch was expanding. Jabari even said he didn't like the way UK was portraying the OAD setting, and came across as if it was all about the NBA with Calipari. Parker, and clearly other kids like Kyrie, wanted more, and their parents wanted more. They wanted the OAD elitism, without the OAD stigma. They wanted the reality of NBA fast-track, but wanted to do it from an elite college academic environment where their parents could pretend their son was bettering himself academically, professionally, and in terms of having future connection through the Duke "set for life" approach.
It worked. By November of 2013, Tyus Jones and Okafor both chose Duke over Kentucky. Winslow followed suit just a few months later.
Since then, Duke has beaten Kentucky for 17 out of 20 top ten guys. While we've been mocking their players and their pitch on the "set for life" angle, few of us have really heard what the players are actually saying. They've literally been telling us the same thing over and over again: they prefer what Duke is pitching to them more than what Kentucky is pitching to them.
Instead of mocking them, maybe Calipari should start listening to them and start selling recruits on everything our state and program can offer besides and beyond the NBA.
Hard to do that when idiots through out half the damn data. Only fools do that.You write responses like this to literally every post you don't like.
Try this one: instead of raging and countering like a man who's never debated an issue in his life, try offering some real counter points to any of the arguments that have been presented.
Cal normally plays 7-8 in his rotation each year. So ideally you’ve got 2 top 15 ranked freshmen….2 big time experienced transfers and 4 players already in the program each year.This is a really good article about what has happened. It is very obvious that Calipari is mostly about getting players to the league than caring about what’s best for UK basketball. I dare say that every player that comes to UK has going to the NBA after only one year on their mind. Many players do leave even though they don’t appear ready. (However, some do better as pros than they did with Calipari coaching them.). Now several leave after only one year and go elsewhere. Why? Some think it’s great that Duke gets all of these five star players, but how many championships have their freshmen won? Zion’s team? This year’s team? We also know that none of these players will stay longer than a year just like past years. Duke will need to go through building a new roster every year. Freshman teams don’t win national titles. I’d rather get one or two top players and some others that will be foundation players for 2 or 3 years. Experience wins championships, not freshmen by themselves.
So my statement is wrong or you just like a truthful statement for your own reasons?The point is that Kentucky does not wade through the same waters of commonality with those other 350 programs. Calipari has specifically and intentionally placed our program on a pedestal, and used very specific terminology to do it. With such sentiments being shared on a public setting, about how UK is the "gold standard", and how he's here because he can "recruit the best of the best", you'd actually think that we'd beat Duke more than 15% of the time for elite recruits, right?
You very well may have a point about Cal burning the bridge with Nike by not attending their event. I agree that is a big mistake. But imo, his post is spot on as far as the real reason Duke is beating UK for so many recruits. It’s not UK’s pitch, the 2015 loss, or most of the other reasons being thrown out here.You and some others keep screeching, "It's Nike!" What other school has a contract with Nike? What other coach was having players funneled to him while at Memphis and early on at Kentucky through individuals like World Wide Wes?
Who burned that bridge with Nike?
I’ll give you the fact that Cal needs to update his offensive philosophy, but the screaming has always been there.Of course Nolan Smith isn't going to do as well at Louisville, they have all kinds of internal, financial problems. I'm so sick of people blaming our recruiting problems on Nike. The problem is, these top recruits see what kind of abysmal 1990's style BB we play and don't want to come here. We rarely beat good teams, and have a screaming Psychopath on the sidelines that screams at his players, assistant coaches and referees the whole game. I think those are the REAL problems.
You think UK/Nike doesnt offer/give some recruits "benefits" on the side? They certainly do, and for your argument to hold serve, Dukes "benefits" would have to be so extraordinary that they outweigh the "the 2nd big contracts & success in NBA of Cal's players" as you said. Which if that were the case, it would be outed in public very easily as there are still a good portion of the media that hates Duke.It's not a secret. Nike has never gone out of their way for a school like they are with Duke currently. WWW is not Nike. He's a very influential person that was certainly with Nike. He's a friend of Cal's who ever since Wagner begin recommending Cal to recruits because he put the recruits above his own personal interests.
That's a far cry from the powers that be with Nike going all out for Coach K. For Pete's sake they built a building a few years ago at their headquarters in honor of & named after Coach K.
At this point it's not about pitches or evidences. Duke cannot compete with all the 2nd big contracts & success in NBA of Cal's players. But it's irrelevant...like it's ignored & why? Because of Nike. The deck is stacked. Even some of Duke insiders know this & do not even deny.
[etc deleted for length]Duke has now beaten us for 17 out of the last 20 head-to-heads for top 10 RSCI guys
So what was it?
2015 says "sup?"I. You’re just not winning a championship with 1&done freshmen.
The one with a Sr captain who was the 2nd leading scorer on the team and with other JR & Soph contributors. 9 guys who regularly played and 3 One and Done fresh. Similar to the 2012 UK team it had some great freshman mixed with experience. Duke literally had a monster of a team with Zion, Barret, Reddish, & Jones and couldn’t do it. UK had Wall, Cousins, & Bledsoe and couldn’t.2015 says "sup?"
you really need to get a life away from this message board.... it's a big world go explore it3 top 10 players in the class of 22....including the overall number 1......keep up
nice come back....I know for a fact you didn't think of that one by yourself... does your mommy know you are up past your bed time?you really need to get a life away from this message board.... it's a big world go explore it
Must be nice to have a program that has two years of studs locked up. I remember those days it was very fun and nice to never worry. Now we are chasing dudes from SW Missouri state. 🤦♂️They’ll fall apart with Scheyer, right?
bEcAuSe iTs dUkE lAw!!!
Then he doesn’t even use his degree. This should have stopped him from covering UK in its tracks.
If you’re not even going to use it go to UK. I can honestly say as someone who’s going to be driving close to 6 hours for grad to get a UK degree I would have never chose Duke law over UK.
"chosen"bEcAuSe iTs dUkE lAw!!!
Then he doesn’t even use his degree. This should have stopped him from covering UK in its tracks.
If you’re not even going to use it go to UK. I can honestly say as someone who’s going to be driving close to 6 hours for grad to get a UK degree I would have never chose Duke law over UK.