Maalik Murphy Duke QB visiting UK today.

[TucsonCat]

Cover 3 Podcast thinks Duke let him walk just FYI.

Did they say why? If it's for character reasons, we should care.

But if they think they have a better backup, Murphy still produced. And Oklahoma pushed out a Heisman candidate last year. So that factoid wouldn't scare me off.

 

[mrschwump]

Did they say why? If it's for character reasons, we should care.

But if they think they have a better backup, Murphy still produced. And Oklahoma pushed out a Heisman candidate last year. So that factoid wouldn't scare me off.

Duke has already brought in the Tulane QB.

 

[bthaunert]

Rowland seems to be pushing the Wash St QB.

He's the #1 QB in the portal...I'd be pushing him too.

 

[Crystalglass]

If you watched any Duke this year, you should be hoping that he goes somewhere else. Numbers aside, he has a weak arm, isn’t very accurate, doesn’t seem to make progressions well, and isn’t a running threat.

 

[mrschwump]

If you watched any Duke this year, you should be hoping that he goes somewhere else. Numbers aside, he has a weak arm, isn’t very accurate, doesn’t seem to make progressions well, and isn’t a running threat.

Glad we've cleared that up.

 

[Justwantadecentteam]

Stoops must've decided he could 1up Joker

 

[YaketySax]

the good thing about having Boley is they don't need to break the bank on a QB and can put those funds elsewhere. they need to pay "back up" tier not "we are desperate for a starter" tier.

 

[LawCat1989]

the good thing about having Boley is they don't need to break the bank on a QB and can put those funds elsewhere. they need to pay "back up" tier not "we are desperate for a starter" tier.

I think Boley can develop into a good QB but he certainly hasn’t shown enough to go into next season with him as a starter either. Had a nice half vs Texas, looked like a true Freshman vs UofL. Has a lot of upside but hasn’t earned the starting job either.

 

[CatPatrick13]

Those stats were against acc teams. With our inept offense and sec defenses, will be a challenge for him to replicate here.

Yeah no way the guy can improve at all. Geez dude

 

[UK Cats Rock]

60 percent isn’t bad lol. The ints aren’t great but it was his first year as starter. I would’ve loved for our QB to have had those numbers last year. Not to mention who exactly do yall think we can get in the portal? Come on lol

Duke also dropped 22 passes which obviously hurts the completion percentage.

Regarding the QB from WSU, he has a "no contact" tag on him, so likely headed to OU.

 

[permdaddy]

We will suck on O no matter who the QB is as long as Stoops is coach. Mateer is easily better than Murphy IMO

 

[bigbluedon]

We will suck on O no matter who the QB is as long as Stoops is coach. Mateer is easily better than Murphy IMO

Plus we still have Wolford

 

[DraftCat]

Twitter is saying he committed... welcome to BBN!

 

[Bluesnky]

Twitter is saying he committed... welcome to BBN!

Actually I believe he’s the finest looking QB I’ve ever seen.

 

[mrschwump]

Twitter is saying he committed... welcome to BBN!

Let's wait until his first three and out before we start slicing and dicing.

 

[Thecycle27]

Duke has already brought in the Tulane QB.

They didn’t dive in they just said Duke didn’t fight to keep him. Could be a budget deal plus they had the Tulane guy in their back pocket. Duke didn’t face many good defenses this year so the 11 interception would be red flag.

 

[Bluesnky]

It’s not true. At least not yet. Fake accounts.

 

[TucsonCat]

If you watched any Duke this year, you should be hoping that he goes somewhere else. Numbers aside, he has a weak arm, isn’t very accurate, doesn’t seem to make progressions well, and isn’t a running threat.

Yeah. If perennial football powerhouse Duke only went 9-3 with him, improving by a measly 1 win over last year, how good can he be.

 

[catsfanbgky]

If you watched any Duke this year, you should be hoping that he goes somewhere else. Numbers aside, he has a weak arm, isn’t very accurate, doesn’t seem to make progressions well, and isn’t a running threat.

He does NOT have a weak arm. Can easily throw the ball 50 yards in the air. He has a VERY strong arm. Might want to learn a little about the player before making comments on him. His weakness is he likes to stand in the pocket and throw the ball as he sets up, does not extend plays very well. But he does avoid sacks by getting rid of the ball, hence some accuracy issues. Check out his tape, a weak arm is not one of his issues.

 

[bishop45acp]

Stoops : Can you hand the ball off to a running back?
QB Recruit: Yes i guess so.
Stoops: Great! How do you feel about starting next year?

 

[Dontworryboutit23]

He does NOT have a weak arm. Can easily throw the ball 50 yards in the air. He has a VERY strong arm. Might want to learn a little about the player before making comments on him. His weakness is he likes to stand in the pocket and throw the ball as he sets up, does not extend plays very well. But he does avoid sacks by getting rid of the ball, hence some accuracy issues. Check out his tape, a weak arm is not one of his issues.

Yeah arm strength is his greatest attribute. He throws a really good deep ball, and is good pocket passer. The lack of being a running threat is why I question the fit here.

 

[catsfanbgky]

Yeah arm strength is his greatest attribute. He throws a really good deep ball, and is good pocket passer. The lack of being a running threat is why I question the fit here.

The poster who stated "if you watched Duke this year, he has a weak arm", obviously didn't watch a single Duke game this year , LOL. He said it so matter of fact, and couldn't be more WRONG. Those type of posters are the ones I have issues with. I do not mind someone having a difference of opinion than mine, but not when it is not even close to being accurate or simply made up.