I rewatched the London game. A person can learn from that experience. A few observations:
1. Kentucky won. Not a small point. The Cats didn't have that much more talent 1-4 than Michigan and won the game on a neutral court.
2. Oscar was still recovering. It was an early season game and Oscar was still not close to his 2021 form after the medical procedure.
3. Oscar was still a much better rebounder. He out-rebounded HD 14 -to - 9 and got several more critical rebounds.
3. Dickinson dominated the ball for Michigan. Their offense was a lot of standing around waiting to throw the ball into Dickinson.
4. Dickinson took TWENTY THREE shots. He was 10-23. 43 percent is not that great for a 7-footer playing that close to the basket.
5. Michigan's other players looked a little frustrated with the pace. It felt like Dickinson was slowing down the offense. The other players took some rushed shots after failing to get the ball into him.
6. Kentucky's offense was much more open and diverse. The Cats had five players in double figures. Dickinson and Howard were pretty much the whole scoring threat for Michigan.
7. Onyenso had as many blocks in five minutes (3) as Dickinson did in 35. He is really not a rim protector.
I've been on the record here since Dickinson entered the portal saying he wasn't a good fit for the Cats with several very talented young players who will want to push the pace and get scoring opportunities. Watching the UK-UM game didn't make me change my mind. Dickinson had a great stat line on the surface. But I don't see him fitting with Wagner, Edwards, Reeves, Dillingham, and so on in a multi-faceted offense. And Ugo is already a better rim protector, as Oscar is a much, much better rebounder if he returns.
1. Kentucky won. Not a small point. The Cats didn't have that much more talent 1-4 than Michigan and won the game on a neutral court.
2. Oscar was still recovering. It was an early season game and Oscar was still not close to his 2021 form after the medical procedure.
3. Oscar was still a much better rebounder. He out-rebounded HD 14 -to - 9 and got several more critical rebounds.
3. Dickinson dominated the ball for Michigan. Their offense was a lot of standing around waiting to throw the ball into Dickinson.
4. Dickinson took TWENTY THREE shots. He was 10-23. 43 percent is not that great for a 7-footer playing that close to the basket.
5. Michigan's other players looked a little frustrated with the pace. It felt like Dickinson was slowing down the offense. The other players took some rushed shots after failing to get the ball into him.
6. Kentucky's offense was much more open and diverse. The Cats had five players in double figures. Dickinson and Howard were pretty much the whole scoring threat for Michigan.
7. Onyenso had as many blocks in five minutes (3) as Dickinson did in 35. He is really not a rim protector.
I've been on the record here since Dickinson entered the portal saying he wasn't a good fit for the Cats with several very talented young players who will want to push the pace and get scoring opportunities. Watching the UK-UM game didn't make me change my mind. Dickinson had a great stat line on the surface. But I don't see him fitting with Wagner, Edwards, Reeves, Dillingham, and so on in a multi-faceted offense. And Ugo is already a better rim protector, as Oscar is a much, much better rebounder if he returns.
Last edited: