No is the answer to your question.
Now I'm done.
Yeah but you fail to understand the simple fact that the ncaa has absolutely no reason to follow their own rules that they create.
They found a loophole in the UNC case. But anyone with common sense knows what went on.
Many teams have taken more money than the Louisville basketball team did for hookers but the atrocity of the offense meant they lose a championship.
You fail to acknowledge that coach K’s program broke the same rules that umass did and the ncaa chose to punish one and not the other.
You think I believe I am right and it’s no use arguing but can you answer why rules apply differently to certain schools?
If the ncaa can apply rules in taking money from agents differently to schools your stance is they are not allowed to do that in an academic fraud case?
What about enes kanter? There were many before and many after him that took money from foreign teams but were allowed to play.
The NCAA is not allowed to do that, yet they did. You want to cite one case of the NCAA claiming their hands are tied because rules are rules and ignore all the other times they enforced rules or did not enforce rules based on the program committing the infraction.
I have given you several examples of this. You give me one and claim you are right.