Kicking the FG instead of going for the TD
- Thread starter 2koolpa
- Start date
This guy is giving their field goal unit at 1 for 3, beginning at the 25 a better shot, than our offense scoring a TD from their 2 yard line..............Is that you Coach Stoops?
Not even going to waste my time.
.................poof. Off to the HDB you go.
Debate about winning decisions extending to 6 pages. Bye Week Hysterics Platoon. #ByeWhips.
Alright clown, it would help if you could learn to quote.
First of all, eat more clock going for it is a stupid ass argument. A play from the 2 is going to be quick- about the same amount of time a FG takes.
Next - touchback was guaranteed kicking in the direction we were. Proven all game.
Mizzous kicker had an absolute boot - I watched pregame and he was good for 10-12 yards more than MacGinnis. He had the leg for a 50 yarder going against the wind. Their snapper was horrible - he absolutely could’ve blown a snap, or they could’ve put together a good snap, hold and kick and locked a tie.
And yes, I give them a greater chance of kicking a FG starting from the 2, than scoring a TD from the 25. And with our play calling, would’ve given the TD about a 20% chance.
I can see it being a 50-50 or 60-40 call, and I see you as being 100% dick.
First of all, eat more clock going for it is a stupid ass argument. A play from the 2 is going to be quick- about the same amount of time a FG takes.
Next - touchback was guaranteed kicking in the direction we were. Proven all game.
Mizzous kicker had an absolute boot - I watched pregame and he was good for 10-12 yards more than MacGinnis. He had the leg for a 50 yarder going against the wind. Their snapper was horrible - he absolutely could’ve blown a snap, or they could’ve put together a good snap, hold and kick and locked a tie.
And yes, I give them a greater chance of kicking a FG starting from the 2, than scoring a TD from the 25. And with our play calling, would’ve given the TD about a 20% chance.
I can see it being a 50-50 or 60-40 call, and I see you as being 100% dick.
For the game we ran five plays inside the three. We converted zero of them......
Their kicker was 3-5 not 1-3. (Could say 3-6 as he got the rekick on the flop running into the kicker). But he also made four xps. So for the night they were 7-11 total on kicks. So wasn't like they missed everything.
But those stats don't matter.
Their kicker was 3-5 not 1-3. (Could say 3-6 as he got the rekick on the flop running into the kicker). But he also made four xps. So for the night they were 7-11 total on kicks. So wasn't like they missed everything.
But those stats don't matter.
Wth? 
This is still be argued KFF?
Lets keep beating that horse. It has to get up sometime
This is still be argued KFF? Lets keep beating that horse. It has to get up sometime
DING, DING, DING, DING, DING, DING, DING, DING, DING, DING, DING, DING, DING . . . .
You're not very good at connecting the dots, lol. The "thinking alike" was between you and the HDB ; )
No worries, mistakes are the norm in the HBD. You'll fit in wonderfully. They are currently in Lemming Training (LT), then on to the "We the Sheeple" seminar. Their pseudo-leadership likes to break down all vestiges of independent thought prior to commencing the next phase of training - Latrine Sanitization. An integral component of HBD life, as they are full of it.
Those that can "think" have got it at this point. Others, more challenged, are having trouble on the issue. I suggest you go back and read over and over the postings in this thread, and perhaps, just perhaps, you'll have an epiphany. Doubtful, but nonetheless you should try, as the alternative, is.....well, you know...hup, two, three, four.
Here is what I know, what stoops decided to do, and what 95 percent of coaches would have done, worked. We won the game.
We don't know if other would have, hard to argue a decision that worked, when you don't know the other outcome. We very easily could of lost if we went for it.
So that alone should be a good decision.
Now the fourth down plays last night in Troy game all were horrible!
We don't know if other would have, hard to argue a decision that worked, when you don't know the other outcome. We very easily could of lost if we went for it.
So that alone should be a good decision.
Now the fourth down plays last night in Troy game all were horrible!
Of the choices available, it's pretty cut and dry.......and one hint; it ain't with the field goal, lol...............hup, two three four, hup, two three four : )
Shhhhhhhhhhhh., Caveman, I'm trying to get KatFootballFan to exceed the Barnhardt "rant count" of Jauk11 . . . . another 20 pages, or so, and we will have another first since Bear Bryant!
I've heard of guys building their post numbers. Is there some free tupperware after achieving a certain level?.............go hack go! Hup, two, three, four.....I think you are officer material!!
You mean that U of L had a shooting & FB players were involved? Why wasn't this incident reported by UL or by the CJ?
Reported...investigated?????? Never happening under the emperor's watch. He is gone NIW wonder if that will change?
Funny thing is is if that happened and UK lost in OT you would probably be the first one on here screaming 'WHY DIDN'T THEY KICK THE FIELD GOAL?' You know it, I know it, we all know it.
Stoops decision to go for it on 4th and 1 on our side of the field was a pretty gutsy call too.
We won, who cares. He obviously made the right call because it was much harder for them to score a TD than it was to make a field goal as they were already in field goal range. Maybe he looked at his team and thought they were too gassed to make it through OT. You'll never know because you're just an armchair coach.
Let's go over the BS before you ship out to the Homer Defense Battalion:
- "Funny thing is is if that happened and UK lost in OT you would probably be the first one on here screaming 'WHY DIDN'T THEY KICK THE FIELD GOAL?' You know it, I know it, we all know it." Irrelevant....and ignorant, all in one fell swoop. Going for the TD was the call, and still is, LMAO. Only thing that hasn't changed is your ability to reason, or lack thereof.
- " Stoops decision to go for it on 4th and 1 on our side of the field was a pretty gutsy call too." That "homerism" is a piss poor attempt at deflection....and I wouldn't get too giddy about one ballsy call over a 6 game span, lol. Especially after completely missing on this call, which put Mizzou in Better Position to Win the Game. Funny as hell.
- "We won, who cares. He obviously made the right call because it was much harder for them to score a TD than it was to make a field goal as they were already in field goal range. Maybe he looked at his team and thought they were too gassed to make it through OT. You'll never know because you're just an armchair coach.".......or maybe, he's a little bit challenged in the realm of football strategy? Should we list examples? Tell you what, it is certainly better to question from the arm chair, as opposed to the high chair.......and watch yourself, you know how that sliding tray can pinch your fingers!
: ) No, I'm a veteran, so I wouldn't do that, lol.
No, the HOMER DEFENSE BATTALION is a loose, unorganized, and just down right sloppy pseudo-military outfit that mindlessly protects any and all propoganda, decision making, or coaching decisions made in relation to UK Football - both past and present.....without logic or reasoning, as they possess neither.
HDB - The Mission Statement:
"We homers will do ar best to defent the coachs here at Kentuckey. they canot be wrong, and well let them winers knowd that on that innerweb site. well fight to get dem kats to a bowel. we luv bowels!"
It's a surprisingly tight knit group.
Similar threads
