Jerry, you know my post was in jest of course, but I'd like to respectfully pose a serious question:
If it is encumbent on us to report legitimate concerns, why do we have moderators?
I completely get that the mods can't be everywhere all at once and that reporting fills that gap, but the poster and his content in question is a 3 years running or so gag. If there's a thread about uk alum doing well in the NBA, he'll come on and say "Too bad Cal couldn't win." Anyone paying attention knows this poster skews all topics towards unnecessary attacks on Cal.
And I'm all for in-depth, heated but ultimately honest discussions. No coach or player should be beyond reproach. However, I don't think that's what we are dealing with. If the board policy is we've got to make reports to get movement, that's fine really. I just don't think that's been the case in the past.