From your earlier post:Again, can you name a point when UK invested this much?
Can you name a coach who had this much at his disposal?
Then they are why we will never reach our potential as a program. Hopefully they find a new program to hinder.
Who claimed we needed to annually contend? Wouldn't it be nice to occasionally though? Even once?
Considering he has been here a decade and we haven't made it a full season ranked, why would that suddenly change under Stoops?
Then what is the point in having a program or investing in it? Seems pretty pointless and wasteful to spend 50 million in a hc salary to be a music city bowl or belk bowl contender.
I would rather just invest into other sports if those are the only options.
I hope none of you all are athletic directors.
“Stoops, but I think he has peaked and we are likely going to struggle to maintain 10-2 or 9-3 type seasons going forward.”
The original question is why you think a coach’s floor is to maintain a 9-10 win regular season when that has never been done at Kentucky?
I agree that more has been invested more in this program than ever before, but it still is a fraction of what 12/14 spend, soon to be 14/16 in the SEC. Just because we are spending more money than ever before doesn’t automatically mean Kentucky is going to be a top program.
Our AD had given out two of the worst contracts in college sports history, that we can agree on.
Maybe I’m just a loser fan However as a lifelong UK football fan watching 2 win seasons and routine beat downs in conference the idea of making a bowl game every year and finishing in the top 15 every once in a while I think is great.
I hope one day you look back and Kentucky is routinely in the top 10 and you can say,
“See man, I told you so!”
If that happens we can meet up at the playoff and I will buy you a $20 beer lol.