I like Kentucky's class and wouldn't trade it. I like ours best. But it is not far and away better than Duke's class. Simply not true. And while fans love to argue class rankings, hanging banners is really what matters. Kentucky basketball IS all about hanging banners. If you don't think so, then why was everyone so disappointed after we lost to Wisconsin? I'm surprised to see someone seriously try to argue that.
Skal and Jamal Murray both will be in the running for national player of the year by year end. It would surprise no one if Skal is the best big and Jamal Murray is the best guard in the country. Ingram is skilled and very athletic, but he's VERY thin. I can't see him dominating without putting on a lot more weight. On paper the classes look comparable, but if you watched these guys play it's clear that UK's class is considerably better.
I will always argue against the notion that Kentucky basketball is all about hanging banners. That way of thinking implies that the program has only succeeded eight times in history and all other years have been failures. Winning a title is the primary goal but there is so much more to celebrate.