GYERO ARCHIVE
- Thread starter anthonys735
- Start date
- Status
That bill is to prevent employers from requiring vaccinations for employment. Not to require all kids to be vaccinated without parental approval. Lol.
Think krazy read that from the same Facebook post saying the vaccine causes you to go sterile along with fluoride
I am by no means a legal ball, but I’m pretty sure that bill says the exact opposite, krazy.
I hope the LRC is currently pulling personnel files to see if any of their hires have experience in slinging lumber or bourbon.
Next time someone compares your success to Forrest Gump instead of getting angry you should refer back to this post and your complete lack of reading comprehension and just think, “yeah they may have a point”
After the bourbon business nets krazy the funds his obvious next foray is politics.
I like Krazy and I also think he could be the mayor of Mt Washington
What makes you say that?
"Further, nothing contained in KRS 158.035, 194A.025, 214.010, 214.020, 12 214.032 to 214.036, 214.990, or KRS Chapter 211, shall be construed to permit the Cabinet for Health and Family Services, or any other agent or instrumentality of the Commonwealth of Kentucky to require the immunization of any person"
[Taken from the actual text of the proposed bill that krazy referenced.]
21RS SB 37
apps.legislature.ky.gov
"HB 69
Amends KRS 69.69 to make mutual oral sex the Official Non-Intercourse Sex Act of the Commonwealth."
Amends KRS 69.69 to make mutual oral sex the Official Non-Intercourse Sex Act of the Commonwealth."
Not quite true, actually. Here is the current enacted version of KRS 214.036:
Nothing contained in KRS 158.035, 214.010, 214.020, 214.032 to 214.036, and 214.990 shall be construed to require the testing for tuberculosis or the immunization of any child at a time when, in the written opinion of his attending physician, such testing or immunization would be injurious to the child's health. Nor shall KRS 158.035, 214.010, 214.020, 214.032 to 214.036, and 214.990 be construed to require the immunization of any child whose parents are opposed to medical immunization against disease, and who object by a written sworn statement to the immunization of such child on religious grounds. Provided, however, that in the event of an epidemic in a given area, the Cabinet for Health and Family Services may, by emergency regulation, require the immunization of all persons within the area of epidemic, against the disease responsible for such epidemic.
In other words, the bill that krazy referenced appears to be intended to do the exact effing opposite of what he is talking about (which never really happened anyway but was technically possible).
Literally amazing.
-yeah, Krazy...but do you know what the queers are doing to the soil?
Contrary to what SAE and WCC* types are trying to do, I'm confident in an America that wouldn't force emergency use vaccinations on children when no trials have even been done on them, and the virus is completely harmless for them.
*This isn't hyperbole, wcc and sae are literally in favor of a communist socialism dictatorship.
*This isn't hyperbole, wcc and sae are literally in favor of a communist socialism dictatorship.
Good deal, so I misworded something I misunderstood.
I’ll take that! Pretty close if you ask me.
All these words when GFY works.
Get pumped loser!
I’ll take that! Pretty close if you ask me.
All these words when GFY works.
Get pumped loser!
I don’t know why you’re upset. Your sheer idiocy makes your success and accomplishments even more impressive.
I’m not upset, your willingness to talk down to someone that was basically right is on cue.
Sure maybe I misworded what is actually being voted “for” but it’s the same damn difference to those that aren’t being over technical for argument sake.
Sure maybe I misworded what is actually being voted “for” but it’s the same damn difference to those that aren’t being over technical for argument sake.
Last edited:
You weren’t basically right though, you were completely wrong, like the exact opposite of what is actually happening.
I said this is a vote to vaccinate kids. Technically that’s already allowed, and this is to stop that legality.
Same difference.
Last edited:
-an axiom/colloquialism i *try* to live by: " you don't have to attend every fight you are invited to".
I never said you can’t vaccinate kids without permission. So you’re still wrong.
Feel free not to respond though if you want it to be over!
Holy shit does UK basketball need to get back to kicking ass in front of live fans.
Did you see the "*"? I thought that cleared it up. What part specifically did you take exception with?
Nice little stroller walk this evening. Maybe 50 out but felt like 70. Picked up some Pompilios takeout. Love these first hints of spring.
Had to sign a written warning at work this morning.
Calling your boss out on Microsoft Teams, in fact telling him his decision making lacks nuance of thought and logic, and is indicative of a smooth brain doesn't play well. (even if you're correct)
(my various supervisors will be popping champagne corks when I finally retire)
Calling your boss out on Microsoft Teams, in fact telling him his decision making lacks nuance of thought and logic, and is indicative of a smooth brain doesn't play well. (even if you're correct)
(my various supervisors will be popping champagne corks when I finally retire)
- Status
