I feel like Richards continues to start only for the 5 starting Freshman talking point.
Jump ballI feel like Richards continues to start only for the 5 starting Freshman talking point.
I don't hate Richards, in fact, I have a feeling he will be improve greatly when (if?) he comes back next year.
...but man that dude has prompted more early game redass from me than any player ever. There really is no justifiable reason to start him.
I feel like Richards continues to start only for the 5 starting Freshman talking point.
He could have started Vando several times and didn't. He's starting him because he's blindly loyal to the kids and he's not going to roll anyone under the bus. I don't know why it kills people that he starts, then plays the kid about 10 minutes a game, and has most of the season. Seems to have worked with Hami.I feel like Richards continues to start only for the 5 starting Freshman talking point.
Players lose starting positions all the time, coaches tinker with different starting lineups all the time. It's not throwing a kid under the bus to experiment with different starting lineups. In fact, Richards might actually benefit from watching some of the game early and playing against subs rather than the fresh legs of the other teams best players. I think he would certainly benefit playing with Wenyen and Quade combo to get more floor spacing. Green lost his starting position, Washington lost his...if a player can't deal with that mentally than I'm not sure I want them out there to begin with.He could have started Vando several times and didn't. He's starting him because he's blindly loyal to the kids and he's not going to roll anyone under the bus. I don't know why it kills people that he starts, then plays the kid about 10 minutes a game, and has most of the season. Seems to have worked with Hami.
Players lose starting positions all the time, coaches tinker with different starting lineups all the time. It's not throwing a kid under the bus to experiment with different starting lineups. In fact, Richards might actually benefit from watching some of the game early and playing against subs rather than the fresh legs of the other teams best players. I think he would certainly benefit playing with Wenyen and Quade combo to get more floor spacing. Green lost his starting position, Washington lost his...if a player can't deal with that mentally than I'm not sure I want them out there to begin with.
Anyway, I would rather enjoy our good play and good fortune than whine about starting lineups (until next game), Cal is obviously pushing the right buttons at the right time. We are all wildcat friends here go cats!
I mean, this is the kind of take only comes about when you're livid inside and can't find any rational reason to express how pissed off you are. It warms my heart to know that people are taking this shit so personally....
But, this prompted me to actually take a look at our paths in the NCAA-T since Calipari became the HC:
It's not hyperbole to say that UK is consistently in one of the top-2 toughest regions every year in the NCAA-T and almost always has one of the toughest roads to the F4. Where is the outrage when a bracket breaks for Kansas, Duke, or UNC.
- 4 out of the 8 years, UK's road in the region has consisted of playing the top seed possible at that point in the tournament.
- In the 4 years that weren't complete chalk, 2010 is probably the only year that the bracket "opened" up for UK with Wake in the 2nd Round and Cornell in the S16. Then WVU happened...
- In 2015, we played the 5-seed in the S16 (instead of the 4-seed) and the 3-seed in the E8 (instead of the 2-seed). Hard to say that the bracket "opened" that year. Then Wisconsin happened...
- In 2017, we played Wichita St. as a 10-seed in the 2nd round, when in reality, they should've been an 8-seed at worse. Other than that, the road to the F4 was chalk.
F*ck em all.
Found it at the end of senior year...how many of those MFs did he pass up? He's always had it, one of my favorite players...couldn't be happier for a dude.
The funniest thing about the original story Tucker replied to is it didn't change how I felt about Lupica, because I already thought he was a stereotypical self-important dweeb. It did, however, make me think whoever that chick was writing the story was a very annoying jackass who likes to do ish like come up with elaborate baseball handshakes to introduce an author. Ok, toots
Bob Ryan always struck me as a huuugggeeee assholeLooking back, the Sports Reporters - outside of Bob Ryan and Jackie McMullin - were a real group of assholes.
I think he's more of a conventional sports journalist asshole, though - not a massive egotistical prick or a kid toucher.Bob Ryan always struck me as a huuugggeeee asshole
Norlander tried to defend that by saying the list accounted for season-long resume and tournament performance. Okay, well (1) that's stupid, and (2) he threw "UK NOT IN TOP 10" in the headline. What a nerd.Matt Norlander is consistently terrible. This time he’s re-seeded the sweet 16. UK is not in his top 10 and is behind Loyola and Nevada. He also has A&M as the 3rd worst team left.
I honestly don’t think he understands basketball at all. I’ve never seen him write anything smart or insightful.
He's also pretty funny and self-aware. He's on LeBatard sometimes and he will always make fun of himself and play along.Bob Ryan is awesome. Basketball encyclopedia.
I think he reseeded it based on adding the two opening round games to the team’s resumes and not as a “Power Ranking” - which is what everyone would and should assume a reseeding would be.Matt Norlander is consistently terrible. This time he’s re-seeded the sweet 16. UK is not in his top 10 and is behind Loyola and Nevada. He also has A&M as the 3rd worst team left.
I honestly don’t think he understands basketball at all. I’ve never seen him write anything smart or insightful.