Airlines will make decisions that suit them best. I don’t know the feasibility of zero emission jet fuel and don’t care.
most pilots I have met, have wanted to fly since they were children. It’s a passion. It’s a priority thing to me. He loves his flying and also wishes everyone, himself included would do a better job cleaning the planet’s atmosphere.
You are soooo full of shit.
Virtue signaling is more important than real life changing actions. The power to control others is what many want.
It’s even easier to stop having unwanted babies. If we tied birth control education to the massive amounts of welfare aid in this country and the countries we dole out aid to, we’d help reduce the number population of the world. Population reduction is the solution to all of mankind’s problems.
Too widespread to be a coincidence. Governments around the world want to reduce population. You’ll never convince me otherwise. And that’s why I have a healthy (maybe a bit unhealthy) skepticism of our own.
So letting in 250,000 illegal aliens per MONTH and overpopulating America with new babies will stem the tide??? lol…… Biden and company sound soooooo worried. The talking out both sides of the mouth never stops. Ever.
So you don’t think governments consider worldwide overpopulation an issue?
🤷♂️ I’m not a MM climate change truther, but am a believer that governments the world over want to depopulate the earth. In a controlled manner, obviously.
I’m sorry, Cold Stout Beer. I thought you were offering up Musk as a joke. His idea of a population crisis is rooted in economics, not the environment.
The founder of the weather channel Over the past 15 years, John Coleman became a vocal doubter of human contributions to climate change and opposed actions to address the challenge. As recently as December 2017, he wrote, “There is no significant man-made global warming at this time, there has not been any in the past and there is no reason to fear any in the future. He stated that global warming was nothing more than a political game to control the world and bring on globalism. The world must stand up and fight these bastards.
No. Population will naturally level and begin to decrease. We don’t have to “control” it. But( those who want to control it should go first.
For the past 30 years, we have always been 6-8 years away a point of no return, according to the extremists.
There’s no sign that the human population of earth is leveling off. We’ve added 2 billion people within the past 26 years. An additional billion humans are added every 12-13 years. At this rate there will be 10 billion people by 2050 and a staggering 14 billion by 2100.
Scientists who have studied the issue see the population increasing for about another couple decades, if I recall correctly, and then declining.
There are scientists, too, who have studied the issue and see a continued unchecked increase to the 22nd century and beyond, the most notable being David Attenborough. His lifelong research of earth’s species, including humans, concerns him greatly. He urges us to put the brakes on the growth of the human population beginning now to avoid losing many other species in the near future.
Well, Attenborough thinks humans are the plague of the earth. I don’t share that perspective. I would suspect you don’t have an opinion on that, as atoms are atoms are atoms. Time will tell.
Well, he has studied the subject all of his life and he’s 97 years old so you’ve got to think he’s on to something.
Agree to disagree. He questioned whether we should send aid to third world countries. Not my kind of guy, regardless of his age and how he utilized his degree in economics. The man worth tens of millions questioning aid to third world countries. Not sure he is on to anything good.
Nice. Not relevant. My point stands.
Sorry, I took “atoms are atoms are atoms” as your implication that atoms are the smallest particles in nature. Glad to know you don’t think that’s the case.
I don’t know anyone who has had even a bit of chemistry who thinks atoms are the smallest particles. I was referring to your comment in the other thread, where YOU referenced molecules and atoms.
You make a lot of assertions. I try to stay within the realm of observable knowledge.
Just reducing your words to their natural observable meaning. Atoms to atoms, as they say.
