ADVERTISEMENT

From AJ Storr to Chaz Lanier: First quarter grades for 2024's top 10 transfers

Two of the transfers considered high-profile enough to grade are on an Indiana team that has been blown out by Louisville, Gonzaga and Nebraska, and that looks totally clueless, while a Kentucky team made up 100 percent of transfers have NONE considered high profile, yet have beaten Louisville, Gonzaga and Duke to be ranked Top Five.

Is writer Travis Branham just clueless, or has coaching, chemistry and the support of the Kentucky fan base turned guys not even considered worth making a list of top transfers into a Top Five team? Or both?
 
Butler A+
Brea A+
Oweh A+
Carr A
Robinson A
Williams B
Garrison B+
Kriisa B
Almonor B
I would have to disagree with your grades so far. I would go
A Butler, Brea, & Oweh
B+ Carr
B Williams
B- Robinson, Garrison, & Almonor
D Kriisa
 
Ouch!

Cade Tyson (No. 34), North Carolina Tar Heels (From: Belmont)

Grade: F


Man, oh man. Belmont's Cade Tyson came to North Carolina with a huge reputation, thanks to being one of the best shooters in the MVC. Last season, the 6-foot-7 forward drilled jumpers at a whopping 46.5% rate. But, this year, he has yet to find his stroke at UNC.

So far, he's shooting just 26.7% this season from three. However, the glaring issue has been his defense and keeping guys in front of him on the perimeter. As a result, he's playing just eight minutes a game and hasn't lived up to the hype he generated at Belmont. In mid-December he's barely in UNC's rotation.
 
Love the fact that this group excels more as a UNIT than individual players. I think we had 15 years of spotlighting and deferring of individuals to the detriment of the team, with the exception of 2012 and 2015. I really love the way this team is growing together and learning their roles. When one player is off, another steps up and all the guys have bought into and are invested in making each other better. This will be crucial for success in the weeks and months to come.
 
Two of the transfers considered high-profile enough to grade are on an Indiana team that has been blown out by Louisville, Gonzaga and Nebraska, and that looks totally clueless, while a Kentucky team made up 100 percent of transfers have NONE considered high profile, yet have beaten Louisville, Gonzaga and Duke to be ranked Top Five.

Is writer Travis Branham just clueless, or has coaching, chemistry and the support of the Kentucky fan base turned guys not even considered worth making a list of top transfers into a Top Five team? Or both?
To be fair, I think he was grading those that were ranked the top 10 in the transfer portal when they transferred in the spring/fall. I don't think any of our transfers were ranked among the top 10 transfers when that portal closed. I don't think he was ranking those he considers the top 10 now. I bet if they were reranked, some of our transfers make the list (Butler, Carr, Oweh).
 
Carr led us in scoring and at worst tied for second in rebounding in both our two biggest wins. Which together are incidentally the biggest pair of marquee wins anyone in the country has no matter what they’re rated. And people are giving him B’s. 🙄 😂
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT