ADVERTISEMENT

Forde Trolling Again.

That isn't a real question Brian. It is almost rhetorical. I would build a team of 2 to 3 elite players each year, the rest of my recruits would be guys I think can mature into NBA talents or at least over seas pros. I would always have a solid and mature core, period. I have said the same thing in here for years. Like it or not, that is my opinion.


And you think you could match the success we've had the last six years?
 
Let's see...2 or 3 elite players surrounded by some pretty good ones. Sounds like what Wisconsin put on the floor the past couple years.

Wait a minute though. Bo Ryan is 0-2 in the Final Four. That's no good. Of course we won't know how bad he is until 4 more trips.

How about Michigan St.? They follow this formula very well.

Oh no, that can't be right. Izzo is even WORSE in the Final Four than Cal.

Kansas always seems to have a couple of studs mixed in with upperclassmen. But the funny thing is, they've only been to one FF since Cal got to Lexington. Good thing they didn't get to 4 or 5...they could have had more losses!!!

How's about perennial blueblood UNC? They only had one guy drafted this year, but they usually have a couple. And lots of their players hang around to provide that upperclassmen leadership.

But there's something wrong here too. Ol Roy hasn't sniffed the Final Four since 2009. At least he knows how to close the deal when he gets there.

I guess it all boils down to Duke and UCONN. They have each won 2 titles since Cal got here, which proves that Cal's system doesn't work. I knew there was proof in there somewhere.

I would say UL, since they won the other title these last 6 years with their senior laden team. But I can't quite figure how Cal has managed to beat them 7 out of 8, including twice under those bright NCAA lights. Anomalies, very likely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EvilMD and brianpoe
Let's see...2 or 3 elite players surrounded by some pretty good ones. Sounds like what Wisconsin put on the floor the past couple years.

Wait a minute though. Bo Ryan is 0-2 in the Final Four. That's no good. Of course we won't know how bad he is until 4 more trips.

How about Michigan St.? They follow this formula very well.

Oh no, that can't be right. Izzo is even WORSE in the Final Four than Cal.

Kansas always seems to have a couple of studs mixed in with upperclassmen. But the funny thing is, they've only been to one FF since Cal got to Lexington. Good thing they didn't get to 4 or 5...they could have had more losses!!!

How's about perennial blueblood UNC? They only had one guy drafted this year, but they usually have a couple. And lots of their players hang around to provide that upperclassmen leadership.

But there's something wrong here too. Ol Roy hasn't sniffed the Final Four since 2009. At least he knows how to close the deal when he gets there.

I guess it all boils down to Duke and UCONN. They have each won 2 titles since Cal got here, which proves that Cal's system doesn't work. I knew there was proof in there somewhere.

I would say UL, since they won the other title these last 6 years with their senior laden team. But I can't quite figure how Cal has managed to beat them 7 out of 8, including twice under those bright NCAA lights. Anomalies, very likely.



His point of view is a bit different. It is obvious he doesn't like Cal.

First Cal has not performed good enough as he references Cal's failure to win titles.

Secondly he would rather have a team as you have described over our team the last six years of which he would fair far worse than the standard he set for Cal.

Many times the more these complainers talk, they will work themselves into a corner, and show their true colors running out of reasonable responses.

Now I do not believe he is a troll by any means. He just doesn't like Cal.

Doesn't like the words Cal says.
Doesn't like Cal's goals.
Doesn't like the make-up of Cal's rosters.
Is not satisfied with Cal's performance.


I don't get it. However, he does have other good takes on things not related to Cal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aike
Let's see...2 or 3 elite players surrounded by some pretty good ones. Sounds like what Wisconsin put on the floor the past couple years.

Wait a minute though. Bo Ryan is 0-2 in the Final Four. That's no good. Of course we won't know how bad he is until 4 more trips.

How about Michigan St.? They follow this formula very well.

Oh no, that can't be right. Izzo is even WORSE in the Final Four than Cal.

Kansas always seems to have a couple of studs mixed in with upperclassmen. But the funny thing is, they've only been to one FF since Cal got to Lexington. Good thing they didn't get to 4 or 5...they could have had more losses!!!

How's about perennial blueblood UNC? They only had one guy drafted this year, but they usually have a couple. And lots of their players hang around to provide that upperclassmen leadership.

But there's something wrong here too. Ol Roy hasn't sniffed the Final Four since 2009. At least he knows how to close the deal when he gets there.

I guess it all boils down to Duke and UCONN. They have each won 2 titles since Cal got here, which proves that Cal's system doesn't work. I knew there was proof in there somewhere.

I would say UL, since they won the other title these last 6 years with their senior laden team. But I can't quite figure how Cal has managed to beat them 7 out of 8, including twice under those bright NCAA lights. Anomalies, very likely.
Blah, blah, blah. You didn't actually say anything.
 
Yep, I've trolled almost 4000 posts over a decade. Do you want me to call you an idiot or do you just accept it.
 
Yep, I've trolled almost 4000 posts over a decade. Do you want me to call you an idiot or do you just accept it.


So you equate 5 non-final four seasons and 1 title to 4 final fours, a runner up and a title?
 
Katswatcher, you said Cal was trying to please some or all of the players he promised PT to, but it's been proven over and over again by player after player's own words that Cal never promises PT or starting spots.
 
Yep, I've trolled almost 4000 posts over a decade. Do you want me to call you an idiot or do you just accept it.

You know I'm not an idiot. I know I'm not an idiot. How self-aware are you?

Just to clarify, since you struggle so mightily...are you aware that your blind hatred keeps you spinning around in circles with nonsensical arguments?

And I'm no shrink, but just how unhappy are you? This can't be fun. At least not if you are really a UK fan. Which sadly, I think you are.
 
I am stating my opinion, not fact. Please get that right in your head. I would not recruit 6 5*'s. It's great from a talent perspective and draft night perspective. Not so great on the NC perspective. What happens when they all leave early? You are so blind by your love of Cal, you refuse to see what is right in front of you. Again, name the NC teams who have done it without significant upper classmen contributions. Since I have answered your questions, I will wait for your answer.

Do you realize what would happen to you as a coach if you did something so stupid as that? 'Hey fans, I opted for this lesser athlete because we were going to have too many great ones.' The irony is you'd probably be leading the mob railing against such a horrible and undefendable decision. Must have been reading too many self help books that preach less is more.

As regards the playing of the Harrison twins to bump their draft status, that's a conspiracy theory right up there with not landing on the moon. We're talking an Area 51 special. I think it would make a wonderful call in topic for a pregame show. I wonder if you'd have the guts to say that to Calpari face to face. I'd pay for a seat at that interview, particularly if the twins were there too.

I just have one question. Were you wearing the aluminum foil hat when that epiphany came to you?

THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE. Go get'em Fox! Tell Scully I said hi
 
  • Like
Reactions: michaeluk26
If I was Pitino, I would have to tell Forde to stop trying discrediting Kentucky & Coach Calipari your making us look mad.
 
NBA GM's disagree with you obviously. Was Josh Harrelson on anybody's radar until he spent one year with Cal? As long as Cal has twice as many first rounders as any other coach your argument is pretty lame. Especially when some of the guys being drafted are not on anyone's mock drafts to start the season like Booker, Bledsoe and James Young.

There is no way to know for sure, but if Booker and Bledsoe had monster seasons at UNCA, it's very likely they would have been picked up in the lottery.

The fact is, these top, 5 star kids are on the NBA radar while in high school and if not for the 19 year old rule, would be top picks right out of the 12th grade, certainly including Anthony Davis and Karl Towns.
There is much to like about Calipari's effect on UK basketball, for UK basketball fans, but he's doing no more to get them ready for the NBA than any other major program head coach in America.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe
It is amazing to me that some can't see that...
1) Cal uses these statements to let the kids know he will help them get to the NBA if they come here
2) The end result of getting those kids here and getting 6-8 guys drafted is Final Four's, and Championships

If you think Cal doesn't start and end the season wanting to win every game you are fooling yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe and MWes11
Katswatcher, you said Cal was trying to please some or all of the players he promised PT to, but it's been proven over and over again by player after player's own words that Cal never promises PT or starting spots.
First of all its " Katwatcher" ----no problem. I also said it was my opinion he promised PT because there is no way of knowing. Players say lots of things .

I think you will agree that PT is discussed when coach and player go through the recruiting process. That is what this thread is about, trying to figure out exactly what Cal said. He makes a statement that his followers doesn't agree with and the denial starts. Thats coach speak or he wasn't talking to the fans, just players. I'm guessing there will always be someone who can tell us what he meant. jmho
 
Devin Booker is a good example. Ranked by Rivals as the #29 player in the 2014 high school class. So, not a top 10 player, doesn't start at UK - and yet is a lottery pick.

The #30 player, for reference was Shaqquan Aaron. Went to UofL, played 7 minutes a game, just transferred IIRC.

The notion that all coaches and programs are interchangeable when it comes to developing talent and getting kids to the NBA is simply foolish. Those who say otherwise have a bias or an ignorance......
 
First of all its " Katwatcher" ----no problem. I also said it was my opinion he promised PT because there is no way of knowing. Players say lots of things .

I think you will agree that PT is discussed when coach and player go through the recruiting process. That is what this thread is about, trying to figure out exactly what Cal said. He makes a statement that his followers doesn't agree with and the denial starts. Thats coach speak or he wasn't talking to the fans, just players. I'm guessing there will always be someone who can tell us what he meant. jmho

I'm sure PT is discussed by almost every coach out there, but Cal says he doesn't, and not one player has contradicted that. So, unless you think every one of them has a reason to lie about that, or that Cal asks them to lie about it, then why not believe them? And Cal?
 
I'm sure PT is discussed by almost every coach out there, but Cal says he doesn't, and not one player has contradicted that. So, unless you think every one of them has a reason to lie about that, or that Cal asks them to lie about it, then why not believe them? And Cal?

Evidently Hawkins and Willis were not promised starting or playing time. The other players had nothing to contradict as they got their playing time. That is why he used the two platoon system. No one knows what was promised unless they were in attendance at the home visits.

Its no big deal, but the platoon system has never worked all that well. Dean Smith used it more than any coach that I remember and he didn't use it very long. I see no benefit from it other than try to please 10 players wth playing time.
 
Evidently Hawkins and Willis were not promised starting or playing time. The other players had nothing to contradict as they got their playing time. That is why he used the two platoon system. No one knows what was promised unless they were in attendance at the home visits.

Its no big deal, but the platoon system has never worked all that well. Dean Smith used it more than any coach that I remember and he didn't use it very long. I see no benefit from it other than try to please 10 players wth playing time.



I have seen this mentioned by most of our recruits and some of our best players..


"But what has come out is the common refrain from the players about how nothing was ever promised by Calipari.

“When he came and watched me play,” sophomore (I thought they were all freshmen?) Dakari Johnson said, “he sat down and told me he wasn’t going to promise me anything and he just wanted me to come in and work hard.”

And that continues…

“(Calipari) didn’t promise us anything,” freshman guard Tyler Ulis said. “He told us he was going to put us on a stage and we had to play, we had to come here and earn our spot and just get better every day.”

More…

“We weren’t promised anything,” sophomore forward Marcus Lee said. “We were told that you had to earn your spot so you couldn’t lack at any practice. You were going to play against the best in pros each day in practice.”

And finally…

“(Calipari) told us that we’re not going to get anything given to us when we get here and we’re going to have to work for it,” freshman guard Devin Booker said. “He just gets the best out of you when you come here.”"


http://www.news-sentinel.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20150325/SPORTS/150329813
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT