ADVERTISEMENT

Flopping on a 3

It's game changing.

Criminal that they don't review it, cancel the points and assess a foul on the POS that flopped. It's gotten so bad that the flopper laughs when they get away with it.
Supposed to be a T. I agree that that's a judgment call line but if replay shows a blatant flop with no contact then the opponent should get the FTs instead. Everyone plays like that and it's sickening because the refs fall for it every time.
 
I was sitting here wondering if a single flop had been called by an NCAA Div 1 ref this entire season. I was happy when they claimed they were gonna make it a priority a few years ago. I hate the whole 'fall down after shooting a 3' strategy . It's a just a cheat. But the refs keep calling it a foul, so it's on them.
 
For the record I made the above post before they kicked OO on a 3 point throw your leg out special … I wish we would break someone’s jaw . Let a bench rider break a face .
 
  • Like
Reactions: paulcalhoun
It's game changing.

Criminal that they don't review it, cancel the points and assess a foul on the POS that flopped. It's gotten so bad that the flopper laughs when they get away with it.
I don't think the officials we have these days are capable of calling a clean game, they are horrible, they miss obvious calls, then make horrible calls, maybe the game is just too fast for them or they are just unqualified to be officials.
 
I don't think the officials we have these days are capable of calling a clean game, they are horrible, they miss obvious calls, then make horrible calls, maybe the game is just too fast for them or they are just unqualified to be officials.
Or they are intentionally cheating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ftp000
It's game changing.

Criminal that they don't review it, cancel the points and assess a foul on the POS that flopped. It's gotten so bad that the flopper laughs when they get away with it.

I agree it should be reviewable…

Just one or two seasons of a bunch of flippers getting technicals called on them would stop the nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cold Stout Beer
No way he could not have fallen on that 3. He kicked his legs out as far as he could to get contact. He wasn’t even trying to make the shot. His intent was to get the foul.
He wasn’t touched and the ball was 2 feet short from kicking his legs out.
 
Most of time the refs don't like defending the three. It is like they are telling the defender to just stand back away from the shooter and don't even guard them. Why can't ref's in our conference be told to err on the side of missed fouls called if anything?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT