I'll admit I am biased, obviously. I got plenty of mailers and saw other ads besides Paul's in favor of the amendment. Maybe it's a Fayette/Jefferson thing due to large constituency. I don't know.
Now, if there was an actual PLAN that amendment 2 would have led to, it might have done better. Transparency about what the legislature would have actually done with the money would have helped.
Look, I get that people are less than enthused about public education. But are they upset enough to let the KY legislature do whatever they want and amend the state constitution with no outline of how the funds would be dispersed? Would they be happy with a upper-middle class family receiving the same amount of money from the state for private school as a one-parent family? What about homeschoolers? It was all way too vague, not to mention talking points about 'raising teacher salaries' that had no basis in truth or fact.
are you in favor of enabling the General Assembly to provide financial support for the education costs of students in kindergarten through 12th grade who are outside the system of common (public) schools by amending the Constitution of Kentucky as stated below?
I'm not looking to argue, because no one is going to change their mind.