We'd play #9 Arkansas in the second round. You know, in a dream world where a Cal team makes it to the second round.
3 SEC teams as one seeds seems like a very long shot.
Agreed. I think it is very unlikely we land a one seed tbh. I’d be very happy with a 2 seed which I think is feasible3 SEC teams as one seeds seems like a very long shot.
3 is the most any conference has had in a single NCAA Tournament.Didn't the Big East get all four Number 1 seeds back in the mid-2000's? I think Pitt, Louisville, Villanova and maybe UCONN were all 1 seeds from the same conference. Might need to fact-check that.
i don't want that. a pissed off cal, could hero win a game against us, then promptly lose by 20 the next game.
Yeah, ain't gonna happen3 SEC teams as one seeds seems like a very long shot.
Looks like they had 3 one seeds that year. I was really curious and had to google around. Found this random B10 article from 2021, but states the ACC (2019) and Big East (2009) had 3 one seeds.Didn't the Big East get all four Number 1 seeds back in the mid-2000's? I think Pitt, Louisville, Villanova and maybe UCONN were all 1 seeds from the same conference. Might need to fact-check that.
The actual committee would have St Johns playing Arky in the 8/9 game in our region...We'd play #9 Arkansas in the second round. You know, in a dream world where a Cal team makes it to the second round.
3 SEC teams as one seeds seems like a very long shot.
That would be something.3 SEC teams as one seeds seems like a very long shot.
It's December, there are 20+ games left to play, this will in no way be close to what actually happens.
It's a fun exercise ( I guess) but I never understand why anyone gets overly excited (good or bad) when these come out.
You just know the committee is licking their lips to give us a potential r32/s16 matchup with Arkansas assuming the seedlings allow it…..and then they’ll immediately also put a statement out about how they don’t try to put made for tv and storyline matchups togetherWe'd play #9 Arkansas in the second round. You know, in a dream world where a Cal team makes it to the second round.
I was wondering. 2015, right? Seems so very long ago.Last time we were a 1 seed? Ten freaking years ago. 🤬
First I really loved Cal and really appreciated some great years of basketball under him.i don't want that. a pissed off cal, could hero win a game against us, then promptly lose by 20 the next game.
On one hand, it is a bit meaningless as there's still a ton of games.
Also .......just one person. One person's opinion on where teams are at.
Having said that, I do think this provides a good snapshot of at least what path the teams are currently on. I think that has "some use". Given this is like the only thing the guy does, he's probably looking at resumes closer than anyone. I think there's some merit with that.
I'm not sold on us deserving a number one seed at this point. Our defense is suspect and we all know legitimate Final Four teams almost always have top 30 defenses. KenPom currently has us at #44. The good news is we have a lot of room to grow in that area. And I think we will.
I never understand why anybody is selfish and inconsiderate enough to completely ruin the game threads, on purpose to where some people don't even look at them anymore.......but what a world.It's December, there are 20+ games left to play, this will in no way be close to what actually happens.
It's a fun exercise ( I guess) but I never understand why anyone gets overly excited (good or bad) when these come out.
Hey Digger, did you know this isn’t the officially produced bracket from Selection Sunday?Just an FYI, we ALL know this is December and this isn't the real bracket, trust me, we all get it.
This is just a fun thing to look at, that's all, so please don't rush in here to remind us that it’s a meaningless bracket, we all know that.
Let’s get halfway through the conference play before we start filling out brackets.Lots of basketball still to be played. Brackets are pretty meaningless right now