We'd play #9 Arkansas in the second round. You know, in a dream world where a Cal team makes it to the second round.
3 SEC teams as one seeds seems like a very long shot.
Agreed. I think it is very unlikely we land a one seed tbh. I’d be very happy with a 2 seed which I think is feasible3 SEC teams as one seeds seems like a very long shot.
3 is the most any conference has had in a single NCAA Tournament.Didn't the Big East get all four Number 1 seeds back in the mid-2000's? I think Pitt, Louisville, Villanova and maybe UCONN were all 1 seeds from the same conference. Might need to fact-check that.
i don't want that. a pissed off cal, could hero win a game against us, then promptly lose by 20 the next game.
Yeah, ain't gonna happen3 SEC teams as one seeds seems like a very long shot.
Looks like they had 3 one seeds that year. I was really curious and had to google around. Found this random B10 article from 2021, but states the ACC (2019) and Big East (2009) had 3 one seeds.Didn't the Big East get all four Number 1 seeds back in the mid-2000's? I think Pitt, Louisville, Villanova and maybe UCONN were all 1 seeds from the same conference. Might need to fact-check that.
The actual committee would have St Johns playing Arky in the 8/9 game in our region...We'd play #9 Arkansas in the second round. You know, in a dream world where a Cal team makes it to the second round.
3 SEC teams as one seeds seems like a very long shot.
That would be something.3 SEC teams as one seeds seems like a very long shot.
It's December, there are 20+ games left to play, this will in no way be close to what actually happens.
It's a fun exercise ( I guess) but I never understand why anyone gets overly excited (good or bad) when these come out.
You just know the committee is licking their lips to give us a potential r32/s16 matchup with Arkansas assuming the seedlings allow it…..and then they’ll immediately also put a statement out about how they don’t try to put made for tv and storyline matchups togetherWe'd play #9 Arkansas in the second round. You know, in a dream world where a Cal team makes it to the second round.
I was wondering. 2015, right? Seems so very long ago.Last time we were a 1 seed? Ten freaking years ago. 🤬
First I really loved Cal and really appreciated some great years of basketball under him.i don't want that. a pissed off cal, could hero win a game against us, then promptly lose by 20 the next game.
On one hand, it is a bit meaningless as there's still a ton of games.
Also .......just one person. One person's opinion on where teams are at.
Having said that, I do think this provides a good snapshot of at least what path the teams are currently on. I think that has "some use". Given this is like the only thing the guy does, he's probably looking at resumes closer than anyone. I think there's some merit with that.
I'm not sold on us deserving a number one seed at this point. Our defense is suspect and we all know legitimate Final Four teams almost always have top 30 defenses. KenPom currently has us at #44. The good news is we have a lot of room to grow in that area. And I think we will.
I never understand why anybody is selfish and inconsiderate enough to completely ruin the game threads, on purpose, but what a world.It's December, there are 20+ games left to play, this will in no way be close to what actually happens.
It's a fun exercise ( I guess) but I never understand why anyone gets overly excited (good or bad) when these come out.