That’s why it was sarcasm. LolKentucky has tapped into this less than many other schools.
I don’t think this is uk thing. Lol.
That’s why it was sarcasm. LolKentucky has tapped into this less than many other schools.
I don’t think this is uk thing. Lol.
Good then. I just read the title. Still doesn't the NCAA have bigger fish to fry? So now in college BB a kid can go pro straight from HS and now they want to make grad transfers a headache. NCAA are idiots. They want good ratings and that money, but they are not growing with the times and they are just making it harder for programs to adjust and be successful which is what they should want to keep their precious ratings. Just seems like college BB has enough obstacles with the NBA as it is. They want to make this harder, but coaches can still bolt from a college for more money and kids get stuck or have to sit out a year. Get your head out of your asses NCAA!They aren't getting rid of it. They're just creating a nonsensical hassle element that will require more long-term planning for coaches looking for a quick fix en route to signing up 2 or 3 of these guys at a time.
That’s why it was sarcasm. Lol
The NCAA is just worried about money, not student-athletes. Ok, great something for them to work on. When are they going to work on all the cheating and investigations?Ridiculous. Graduate "transfers" aren't a transfer. You've graduated from school. Whether staying at the same school or attending another school, you apply for and get admitted to a separate degree program for grad school. No damn reason why a player who has achieved his degree shouldn't be able to graduate and go wherever he wants. NCAA needs to stop trying to control the student-athletes.
Depends on the program. Many colleges offer a 5 year plan with a masters at the end.Graduating with a masters in one year is almost impossible is it not? Isnt it like 33 credit hours?
Come on now. You have to throw insults when you disagree with someone. It is beyond reason to think someone can layout their reasons without insults.I did read the article. That comment came from Calipari before he changed his mind about the grad transfer rule. And there is no need to be so over the top- saying I can't read and I'm a moron. Could you disagree with me without all of that?
Depends on the program. Many colleges offer a 5 year plan with a masters at the end.
Just because youare paranoid does not mean they are not out to get you.Read the article. It's not the end of grad transfers, it's a method to help control it.
Cal is actually the one who has said this is the way it should be and it's his idea they are moving forward with.
The rule itself seems to have come straight from the mouth of Kentucky Coach John Calipari, who suggested to ESPN in 2016 — long before the committee began its work — that “if the kid gets his grad degree in one year, fine; if he doesn’t, you’ve got to use the scholarship for two years.”
Not everything is anti-UK despite what the ridiculous conspiracy theorists here would like you to believe.
makes perfect scents UK starts using them so lets put a stop to it.The NCAA may end the transfer of players such as Reid Travis and Nate Sestina very soon, according to an article in the New York Times. In two weeks, the NCAA will vote on ending these transfers. A pity that the NCAA seems to never take into account the wishes of its "student-athletes!"
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/04/...rticle®ion=Footer&contentCollection=Sports
Sure JF Cats, I get the distinction, but there's not much of a difference, especially when you have to throw in "can you read?" It's unnecessary hostility. I'm not your enemy. Do you get that?How could it be before he changed his mind when he had already taken a grad transfer at UK?
Saying something moronic (like your post) and being a moron are two different things. I didn't say you are a moron.
You can get drunk and not be an alcoholic.
Yep, good points. If they require the player to finish the grad degree before leaving, that makes matters much more complicated. How many master's degrees only take a year to complete? Mine took 2.5 years. Most take at least 2 years. Why couldn't they use the same approach they use with APR scores and early NBA entrants? That is, why can't they just say players must be in good standing and progressing toward their degree? That makes more sense.I think the most interesting element in this is that if you take two grad transfers, you could potentially lose two scholarships. Still looks like small potatoes for UK, considering Cal seldom stockpiles more than 10 guys.
Teams that take on 2-3 grad transfers at a time will find themselves screwed, however.
Will not affect Kentucky. All it would do is require the grad transfer to get their grad degree in one year or the school would have to give up one scholarship the next year. Cal never uses all his scholarships anyway.The NCAA may end the transfer of players such as Reid Travis and Nate Sestina very soon, according to an article in the New York Times. In two weeks, the NCAA will vote on ending these transfers. A pity that the NCAA seems to never take into account the wishes of its "student-athletes!"
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/04/...rticle®ion=Footer&contentCollection=Sports
Ha! I'm assuming you're joking. If so, I agree with your sarcastic point. Many on this board could use a lesson in how to argue without ad hominem attacks and insults. Clearly, we can disagree in an agreeable way.Come on now. You have to throw insults when you disagree with someone. It is beyond reason to think someone can layout their reasons without insults.
I don't like your posts.I do not like the grad transfers. Hope they do ban it or limit the number of transfers per 4 year period.
or at the beginning, tar holes. Probably this new rule is designed to work to their favor. For each masters a freshman receives they'll get surplus award, additional scholarship. For any PhD awarded to sophomores by mid term that can have their choice between 2 additional scholarships the following season, or be allowed to add any former tarhole currently in G-league to their post-season roster.Depends on the program. Many colleges offer a 5 year plan with a masters at the end.
Ridiculous. Graduate "transfers" aren't a transfer. You've graduated from school. Whether staying at the same school or attending another school, you apply for and get admitted to a separate degree program for grad school. No damn reason why a player who has achieved his degree shouldn't be able to graduate and go wherever he wants. NCAA needs to stop trying to control the student athletes.
So if we take a grad transfer, they play their one year, but haven't finished their graduate degree...it ties up a scholarship the following year?
Not a huge deal to me really.
Yes. And facts are optional here too.Curious: do folks just do a quick glance on the first page? There’s a thread that is already talking about this
Curious: do folks just do a quick glance on the first page? There’s a thread that is already talking about this
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/04/sports/ncaa-final-four-graduate-transfers.htmlLink?
And how are transfers ruining the game?
But it normally takes 2 years to get most Master's degrees doesn't it.
I love RR but there is an ever growing number of grumpy people on here that seem to having nothing better to do than feel it’s their responsibility to patrol posts looking for something to bitch about. I apologize for using up all your Internet. Hopefully you can get some more soon.
Too many take it personally when someone disagrees. Those people will never make it in the real world.Ha! I'm assuming you're joking. If so, I agree with your sarcastic point. Many on this board could use a lesson in how to argue without ad hominem attacks and insults. Clearly, we can disagree in an agreeable way.