Charlie Hunnam isn't a bad actor. I know people hate his American accent(which is the root of his hate), but in Bond he can use his normal British accent. I like Hardy a lot. Idris Elba is perfect for the role but too old
Sounds good. I'm going to take your advice... I just filed requests for the (6) BoB DVDs at the local library.
Hopefully, they'll all arrive in the next couple weeks, and I can binge-watch some of them during the Thanksgiving holiday stretch.
For better or worse... I think it’ll be Henry Cavill. He’s got the chops IMO and is only what, 37ish? Right about the same age when Craig took over.
Never liked Craig as Bond.
It's hard for anyone to live up to Sean Connery status.
Kidnapped by a droneWhatever happened to Bigbluesean?
Idris is perfect. 10 years is fine because most successful actors don't keep the role for long because it restricts other roles.
I think Idris would be good as well.....but my gut tells me that he's be more in the Craig mold. More serious, dark, not incredibly talkative, physical, etc.
Has Idris been in any movie that's more light hearted and funny? Something that shows that he can be of a smart aleck, sarcastic type?
The Losers, but I don't recall him being much different in that than in any of his other movies (maybe slightly different).I think Idris would be good as well.....but my gut tells me that he's be more in the Craig mold. More serious, dark, not incredibly talkative, physical, etc.
Has Idris been in any movie that's more light hearted and funny? Something that shows that he can be of a smart aleck, sarcastic type?
If so, that would have been horrible. Dude seemed to fall off a cliff not to long after showing him the money. He made it into his early 30's before the good movie roles mostly dried up. He popped up every now and then in a bigger movie but mostly was relegated to low budget stuff.I remember back before Daniel Craig was cast that Cuba Gooding Jr was on a shortlist to be the new Bond.
🤦♀️
The Losers, but I don't recall him being much different in that than in any of his other movies (maybe slightly different).
Imagine Cuba Gooding Jr facing down with Mads Mikkelsen in Casino Royale...If so, that would have been horrible. Dude seemed to fall off a cliff not to long after showing him the money. He made it into his early 30's before the good movie roles mostly dried up. He popped up every now and then in a bigger movie but mostly was relegated to low budget stuff.
I really liked The Losers. Definitely not a comedy but it had that light hearted humor (mixed in with gratuitous violence) that was mentioned previously.Hey, I forgot about The Losers. I liked that one.....and it certainly was a comedy in parts.......but you're right, I don't think he was super different than his other roles.
Idris is perfect. 10 years is fine because most successful actors don't keep the role for long because it restricts other roles.
Yeah when Craig started you have the combo of Austin Powers having spoofed the f out of Bond, and the super popular and successful Bourne franchise. Camp was out, gritty was in. I think you'll see more balance between the two with the next Bond.On a side note, the latest movies have gone away from the gadgets. Q just doesn't have the same impact he once did. I know that in the past, the gadgets could get a little too hokey at times but I always thought that it was one of the more defining characteristics of a Bond film.
Why imagine it when you can see it?Imagine Cuba Gooding Jr facing down with Mads Mikkelsen in Casino Royale...
Although I like the idea of guys like Idris, Cavill, or Fassbender more......here are some guys that I think could play the literary character.
Yeah when Craig started you have the combo of Austin Powers having spoofed the f out of Bond, and the super popular and successful Bourne franchise. Camp was out, gritty was in. I think you'll see more balance between the two with the next Bond.
Yeah, the new Bond has worked well when it's been personal (Casino Royale, Skyfall) and has been utterly forgettable and mediocre otherwise (I've watched Spectre twice and can't remember shit about what happens).I hope so. The crazy villain schemes, the gadgets (including the cars), and a certain Bond character approach has been the constant throughout all of them. If all you have is a kick-ass spy saving the world, then it's not separate from the Bourne's of cinema.
It'll also be interesting to see how they deal with certain hot topics in the future. The main one that comes to mind is the objectifying of women. Bond girls like Pussy Galore, Honey Rider, Goodnight...... Obviously they've tried to make the Bond girls more bad a$$ like Halle Berry's Jinx and Michelle Yeoh's Wai Lin, but still.......can some of the old quips and writing endure in this modern time?
Buzzfeed showed some old Bond movies to a bunch of teenagers and none of the teens liked them. Mainly because of Bonds treatment of women.It'll also be interesting to see how they deal with certain hot topics in the future. The main one that comes to mind is the objectifying of women. Bond girls like Pussy Galore, Honey Rider, Goodnight...... Obviously they've tried to make the Bond girls more bad a$$ like Halle Berry's Jinx and Michelle Yeoh's Wai Lin, but still.......can some of the old quips and writing endure in this modern time?
Fassbender is awesome in everything he's done. I'm sure he would kill as 007. Pun intended!
Cavill certainly has the look. I think he could pull off Bond.
Agreed. For me Craig got to angry and too personal with all hits he was to make. Bond is supposed to remain unattached and cool for the most part.Never liked Craig as Bond.
It's hard for anyone to live up to Sean Connery status.