Using this metric, here are the acceptable seasons at UK:
Calipari (15 seasons):
2016-17
2014-15
2015-16? - This team didn't make the Sweet 16, but did win SEC Reg. Sea. and Tournament
2014-15
2013-14? - This team made it to the NCAAT Championship game, but finished 2nd SEC Reg. Sea and lost SECT
2011-12
2010-2011
2009-2010
Gillispie (2 season):
NONE
Tubby (10 seasons):
2004-05
2003-04? Lost in Round of 32 to UAB, but won SEC Reg. Seas. and SECT
2002-03
2000-01? Lost in Sweet 16 to USC, but won SEC Reg. Sea. and SECT
1998-99
1997-98
Pitino (8 seasons):
1996-97
1995-96
1994-95
1992-93
1991-92
1990-91* Still on probation, so no SECT or NCAAT, but won SEC Reg. Seas.
*89-90, finished 14-14, still on probation
Sutton (4 seasons):
1987-88
1985-86
Hall (13 seasons):
1983-84
1977-78
1974-75
Not going to do forty years of Rupp.
By these metrics, Pitino crushes the expectations, Tubby is better than Calipari, Calipari is better than Hall, Sutton would be up there if not for probation, and Gillispie is at the bottom of the bourbon barrel.
What is interesting from this metric as UK standard, is that if Cal had just left after 2017, he would have had 8/9 acceptable seasons at UK, and been right there in the conversation with Pitino as second greatest UK coach all time. Instead, he stayed, and hasn't had an acceptable season since. The question is, what would have happened if Pitino stayed? Would he have regressed, as would be expected over a longer tenure? It would be interesting to use this metric to compare other blue blood programs.