Maybe we can get Bobby Perry type guys, Cal has been slacking off
Need those multi-year players for sure...(Does Cal have any younger sons? I wish...)
Maybe we can get Bobby Perry type guys, Cal has been slacking off
Maybe we can get Bobby Perry type guys, Cal has been slacking off
Barrett and Williamson as our wings. Yes, please.I'd gladly see Reddish at Duke if that means Barrett comes to UK. No contest between the 2 as to who is the alpha dog.
Lol...Need those multi-year players for sure...(Does Cal have any younger sons? I wish...)
Hate to tell you guys Duke lock
Question what class was Diallo put in?4 years depending on which recruiting service you use. Neither of us has been unanimous. 247, ESPN, Rivals usually vary in composite rankings.
Did some you guys really believe We've had the unanimous #1 class the last 4 years? Keep up a little better
Actually we have not. We've been in top 2 every year but I do believe Duke has had #1 three years in a row now. Maybe 4 in a row...not sure about the Okafor, Jones, Winslow year. If they were #1 That year then it is 4 in a row
Duke was considered number 1 in 2014, although our class ended up a little better, imo.
We had the top class in 2015 and 2016. Duke just passed us this year.
As far as pure talent, we had Towns and Booker to their Okafor and Winslow.
Then we had Murray to their Ingram. Ever so slight advantage for them.
Next we had Fox and Monk to their Tatum. Advantage us, imo.
So it hasn't really been the gap that some are implying, even with top end talent.
Bagley is really good. He will probably be the best out of this next group. But I'll probably wait and see what everyone looks like.
Duke was considered number 1 in 2014, although our class ended up a little better, imo.
We had the top class in 2015 and 2016. Duke just passed us this year.
As far as pure talent, we had Towns and Booker to their Okafor and Winslow.
Then we had Murray to their Ingram. Ever so slight advantage for them.
Next we had Fox and Monk to their Tatum. Advantage us, imo.
So it hasn't really been the gap that some are implying, even with top end talent.
Bagley is really good. He will probably be the best out of this next group. But I'll probably wait and see what everyone looks like.
I don't believe that's accurate regarding last year's class. I think UK's was the higher rated class of the two. The year before that, Murray wasn't even added to the equation, thus Duke having the better class, IIRC.Again....we're not talking about whose players end up playing better in college but recruiting class rankings. Depending on which service you (ESPN, 247sports, Scout, Rivals, etc) use it's different for all those years. Last year Duke had the unanimous #1 ranked class. Since 2014 it's been UK & Duke with top 2 classes but nothing unanimous except last season & that belong to Duke.
The issue we we're discussing is Cal was pretty much smoking Coach K 2009-13 then something changed for Duke in 2014 & they closed the recruiting gap. The question has been "what changed"? What is the sell? What is Duke doing different that is making them such a draw that they were not 2009-13?
Again....we're not talking about whose players end up playing better in college but recruiting class rankings. Depending on which service you (ESPN, 247sports, Scout, Rivals, etc) use it's different for all those years. Last year Duke had the unanimous #1 ranked class. Since 2014 it's been UK & Duke with top 2 classes but nothing unanimous except last season & that belong to Duke.
The issue we we're discussing is Cal was pretty much smoking Coach K 2009-13 then something changed for Duke in 2014 & they closed the recruiting gap. The question has been "what changed"? What is the sell? What is Duke doing different that is making them such a draw that they were not 2009-13?
Here's to them falling flat on their faces again this year, creating a dip in recruiting. K is not cut out to field a heavily dominated freshmen team, IMO. We'll see more proof of that this season.It’s reasonable to infer that the addition of Jeff Capel (who was ousted at Oklahoma in ’11) and the overemphasis on Coach K’s Team USA influence were the combining factors for Duke.
Now, with their momentum, Coach K and Capel are selling Team USA and Coach K’s legacy as the face of college hoops. That and the fact that a OAD can go to Duke and still feel like he is a higher class of OAD due Coach K and Duke’s academic history. Parents are buying it.
It’s going to continue to work until K steps down. I suspect he might stick around five more years. That would put him at about 76 or 77 years-old when he finally retires.
Actually we have not. We've been in top 2 every year but I do believe Duke has had #1 three years in a row now. Maybe 4 in a row...not sure about the Okafor, Jones, Winslow year. If they were #1 That year then it is 4 in a row
Here's to them falling flat on their faces again this year, creating a dip in recruiting. K is not cut out to field a heavily dominated freshmen team, IMO. We'll see more proof of that this season.![]()
Again....we're not talking about whose players end up playing better in college but recruiting class rankings. Depending on which service you (ESPN, 247sports, Scout, Rivals, etc) use it's different for all those years. Last year Duke had the unanimous #1 ranked class. Since 2014 it's been UK & Duke with top 2 classes but nothing unanimous except last season & that belong to Duke.
The issue we we're discussing is Cal was pretty much smoking Coach K 2009-13 then something changed for Duke in 2014 & they closed the recruiting gap. The question has been "what changed"? What is the sell? What is Duke doing different that is making them such a draw that they were not 2009-13?
Not sure we're getting Barrett, but I agree that we're in great shape with Quickley and Zion.With what we likely have returning from this years team, give me Zion, Barrett, Quickley, and one or two other top 20 players and I like our chances to go far next year.
Is he now the oldest coach in the major conferences?
I don't believe that's accurate regarding last year's class. I think UK's was the higher rated class of the two. The year before that, Murray wasn't even added to the equation, thus Duke having the better class, IIRC.
You can say that again.Nope Bolden tipped the scale.
Again....we're not talking about whose players end up playing better in college but recruiting class rankings. Depending on which service you (ESPN, 247sports, Scout, Rivals, etc) use it's different for all those years. Last year Duke had the unanimous #1 ranked class. Since 2014 it's been UK & Duke with top 2 classes but nothing unanimous except last season & that belong to Duke.
The issue we we're discussing is Cal was pretty much smoking Coach K 2009-13 then something changed for Duke in 2014 & they closed the recruiting gap. The question has been "what changed"? What is the sell? What is Duke doing different that is making them such a draw that they were not 2009-13?
I guess what irks me, is that there's all this crying about us not getting top 5 guys all the sudden.
Apparently Skal doesn't count, since he struggled. OK then.
How about Murray, who was the 4th freshman drafted in 2016? Oh, he doesn't count either. He must have been 6th or something. Doesn't matter if Cal thought he was top 5, he played like top 5, and was drafted top 5. Because, scouts.
How about Fox? He was the 5th freshman drafted. See above paragraph for why that doesn't matter.
And while we are at it, why not toss in Malik Monk? He was arguably a top 5 player last year too. I mean, he literally won the Jerry West award for best shooting guard. As a freshman.
So yeah, Duke is recruiting well. And we are too. And some of our guys who weren't ranked top 5 probably actually were. And vice versa.
So maybe we can just watch the games and see what happens. Plenty of time to cry about being one player short in April.
I guess what irks me, is that there's all this crying about us not getting top 5 guys all the sudden.
Apparently Skal doesn't count, since he struggled. OK then.
How about Murray, who was the 4th freshman drafted in 2016? Oh, he doesn't count either. He must have been 6th or something. Doesn't matter if Cal thought he was top 5, he played like top 5, and was drafted top 5. Because, scouts.
How about Fox? He was the 5th freshman drafted. See above paragraph for why that doesn't matter.
And while we are at it, why not toss in Malik Monk? He was arguably a top 5 player last year too. I mean, he literally won the Jerry West award for best shooting guard. As a freshman.
So yeah, Duke is recruiting well. And we are too. And some of our guys who weren't ranked top 5 probably actually were. And vice versa.
So maybe we can just watch the games and see what happens. Plenty of time to cry about being one player short in April.
I know what we're talking about. Do you?
Or maybe you just don't know what unanimous means. Because our class was ranked higher than Duke's in 2016.
Not that I really care. Because I really don't care if our class is 1st or 4th or 12th.
But I do like accuracy. So I'm not going to let another poster just make stuff up without pointing it out.
I'm sure you understand.
Now that that's out of the way, I think plenty others have nailed the closing of the gap.
1. Duke fully embraced one and done.
2. Slime bag Jeff Capel was hired.
3. Antigua left.
Not sure anyone mentioned the other reason, but it's that other schools are also plucking off one and dones. California. Washington. LSU. Missouri. And of course Arizona, UCLA, and Kansas.
Our 2016 class was #1 with all services that counted Murray. ESPN did not & Duke was #1.
I haven't posted anything that wasn't true. The whole thing was started by whoever the poster was that thought UK has had the #1 recruiting class every year Cal has been here.
Not that it really matters when comparing classes because both Duke and Kentucky have had great recruiting classes. Personally I believe freshman play a whole lot better under Cal then they do Coach K. I believe our players adjust the NBA much faster then Coach K's players. The numbers do not lie