I was on a UK site on Facebook and two guys were attacking me because I didn't agree with a post saying Cal was worth every penny he is paid and comparing him to a CEO of a major company. Also, they argued that winning Championships isn't a measure of anything because they are so hard to win plus Cal has done so much for the state of Kentucky with the tornadoes and flooding. One guy mentioned how Izzo has not won many Championships at MSU and fans there aren't calling to fire him.
I countered every argument they had to no avail and questioned them comparing MSU tradition to Kentucky's. Their answer was, "what tradition? It was started by Rupp winning titles and even he had point shaving scandals.". These guys were so out of touch with what's happened the past few seasons and just had total love of Cal.
I want Cal to win at UK because I love our university but to go on about what a savior he is for our program while pulling in more than $9 million a year was too much for me not to comment with them.
What are your thoughts about conversing with people like this when they are so ardent in their blind support of someone who is underachieving while getting paid so much. Their final take was that the coach of UK involves so much more than winning games and Championships and that Cal does so much for the players and state that he is actually underpaid for all he does. I'm not a total Cal hater like some on here but, as I told them, a company CEO with results like he has had the past few years would be fired. What do you all say?
I countered every argument they had to no avail and questioned them comparing MSU tradition to Kentucky's. Their answer was, "what tradition? It was started by Rupp winning titles and even he had point shaving scandals.". These guys were so out of touch with what's happened the past few seasons and just had total love of Cal.
I want Cal to win at UK because I love our university but to go on about what a savior he is for our program while pulling in more than $9 million a year was too much for me not to comment with them.
What are your thoughts about conversing with people like this when they are so ardent in their blind support of someone who is underachieving while getting paid so much. Their final take was that the coach of UK involves so much more than winning games and Championships and that Cal does so much for the players and state that he is actually underpaid for all he does. I'm not a total Cal hater like some on here but, as I told them, a company CEO with results like he has had the past few years would be fired. What do you all say?