This guy will have everyone after him. Another example of why we should not panic yet.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True. Let’s get realistic as a fan base. I’m glad Pope is here but he walked into a ish show. Not impressed.Oooooo Utah? Thats Pope's territory. This would be the point guard we need.
He has to be #1 transfer pg now. You definitely got to wait and see who's going to be on the market. Guys are getting their last Nil checks and transfering....
"Shot a career best 40.8% from three this season on 2.5 attempts per game."This guy will have everyone after him. Another example of why we should not panic yet.
Buddy from my hometown goes down as one of the best FT shooters in college basketball history this past season. He hit 11 out of 12!"Shot a career best 40.8% from three this season on 2.5 attempts per game."
That's one made 3 per game. 3 points per game on 3s. Not saying he's not good, but that's not really the stat to tout, is it?
Do you know anybody else Kentucky will be a player for mr mustard?Kentucky will be a player here…
Plus Pope saw him play and should know if he wants himDon’t know anything about him, but 7 ast and 6 reb a game is nice, too
Not nearly as much as it use to beUtah, that's Mormon country!
He was bad from 3 (in the 20s) for three years, then his 40% this last year with good volume.33% from 3........... feels like this is a great Cal type player but man , Pope's system needs closer to 40% from the guards to click like we want it to.
This is an astute observation, BGK ! Thanks for making the point.This one may have been watching to make sure Reed bounced.
I agree 100%. The day may come and I’m trying to be an optimist but we’re in the middle of a shit show as you put it and it’s hard to patient as a UK fan. Let’s get some good news.True. Let’s get realistic as a fan base. I’m glad Pope is here but he walked into a ish show. Not impressed.
I will trust Pope to find the pieces to build with in time.
I wonder if this is the player KSR has been talking about, he’s openly been saying, “there’s a player that’s not in the portal yet, that Kentucky is going to get, and he’s gonna be our best player”No doubt in my mind that Pope is well aware of Smith and very likely has already been in contact with Smith's people. Also, Smith will already be familiar with BYU's offensive and defensive systems under Pope.
Its been this way since boosters at UCLA bought Wooden all those super teams. it was just for a bit less money and everyone didnt know how the sausage was made.Show me the money , that is all CBB is now.
Honestly, that's not a bad number for a PG that averages 7 assists per game. He could jack up more 3pt shots and drop his assist numbers while having a higher output, volume wise, from 3pt distance but would that really be better for the offense? I'd prefer the more than respectable 3pt percentage on decent volume because I feel that means the PG is getting in the lane and getting the whole team involved causing/identifying more problems for the defense. But yes, I do believe the stat was worth pointing out because even though it's not the biggest number, combined with the assist number I feel it's relevant."Shot a career best 40.8% from three this season on 2.5 attempts per game."
That's one made 3 per game. 3 points per game on 3s. Not saying he's not good, but that's not really the stat to tout, is it?
I think the 2.5 was not given to impress us, it was given to say he didn’t make a lot. Sounds about like SGA shooting 3’s at UK"Shot a career best 40.8% from three this season on 2.5 attempts per game."
That's one made 3 per game. 3 points per game on 3s. Not saying he's not good, but that's not really the stat to tout, is it?
I think the 2.5 was not given to impress us, it was given to say he didn’t make a lot. Sounds about like SGA shooting 3’
They both play basketball and that's about it. I have never heard of this player although I hope he can be at least half as good as SGA.
Was it Bill Walton that said he took a pay cut to go to the NBA?Its been this way since boosters at UCLA bought Wooden all those super teams. it was just for a bit less money and everyone didnt know how the sausage was made.
Travis Branham burner account?Honestly, that's not a bad number for a PG that averages 7 assists per game. He could jack up more 3pt shots and drop his assist numbers while having a higher output, volume wise, from 3pt distance but would that really be better for the offense? I'd prefer the more than respectable 3pt percentage on decent volume because I feel that means the PG is getting in the lane and getting the whole team involved causing/identifying more problems for the defense. But yes, I do believe the stat was worth pointing out because even though it's not the biggest number, combined with the assist number I feel it's relevant.
Are you talking to me? As in my account is an alternative account of someone else?Travis Branham burner account?
Are you talking to me? Lmao wtf. Isn't travis Branham a guy who either had or has connections? I honestly don't know. Before all off this I somewhat trusted a few sources but dude im as average as it gets and everything seems to be an educated guess at best. I'm no where in the "know" douche bag.Travis Branham burner account?
"Who me? Naw man. But that guy knows his stuff!" doesn't really ease the suspicion here.Are you talking to me? As in my account is an alternative account of someone else?
Are you talking to me? Lmao wtf. Isn't travis Branham a guy who either had or has connections? I honestly don't know. Before all off this I somewhat trusted a few sources but dude im as average as it gets and everything seems to be an educated guess at best. I'm no where in the "know" douche bag.
Instead of trying to edit anymore of my post, because im not dealing with that crap. I'm just going to say. No, Im not travis branham or anyone that anyone cares to know about but I believe my post made sense and was reasonable. Apparently so reasonable im accused being a burner account. I assure you I have zero connectionsAre you talking to me? As in my account is an alternative account of someone else?
Are you talking to me? Lmao wtf. Isn't travis Branham a guy who either had or has connections? I honestly don't know. Before all off this I somewhat trusted a few sources but dude im as average as it gets and everything seems to be an educated guess at best. I'm no where in the "know" douche bag.
Dude, take a shot of some bourbon. If im ever a somebody it wont be because I break a college basketball recruiting story."Who me? Naw man. But that guy knows his stuff!" doesn't really ease the suspicion here.
The oddity is that you have a 10-year old account, and average about 1 post per year in all that time, but you go out your way to defend the point that Branham was making in a tweet. You don't see how that seems sus? 🕵️♂️Instead of trying to edit anymore of my post, because im not dealing with that crap. I'm just going to say. No, Im not travis branham or anyone that anyone cares to know about but I believe my post made sense and was reasonable. Apparently so reasonable im accused being a burner account. I assure you I have zero connections
I signed up forever ago, literally a teenager. I never posted. Think about it, you are using an average post count from someone who signed up 10 years ago but I haven't posted in those first ten years? Think to yourself kid, did I reactivate my old account or is this some conspiracy. Must be a conspiracy right? Like do you think i sat on this account for 10 years lolThe oddity is that you have a 10-year old account, and average about 1 post per year in all that time, but you go out your way to defend the point that Branham was making in a tweet. You don't see how that seems sus? 🕵️♂️
And then being so defensive when questioned about it? 🕵️♂️🕵️♂️🕵️♂️
Also no I didn't go out of my way to defend a tweet.. I spoke my mind. Show me the tweet, because I didn't see itThe oddity is that you have a 10-year old account, and average about 1 post per year in all that time, but you go out your way to defend the point that Branham was making in a tweet. You don't see how that seems sus? 🕵️♂️
And then being so defensive when questioned about it? 🕵️♂️🕵️♂️🕵️♂️