Yes you should be, the Vikings have been far more successful than the Bengals. LOL, you continue to amaze me with your post, never change. The Vikings are perennial Super Bowl participants, I mean they just played in the Super Bowl in 1977. They even played in it 3 other years, 74,75, and 1977. Very stout record of 0-4 in super bowls. Who wouldn't want to stand behind a team that good. Other than maybe, the Buffalo Bills. Hell the Vikings, if not for bad officiating should have won ALL 4 super bowls they played in (in the 70's). the scores was
23-7 (1970) / 24-7 (1974) / 16-6 (1975) / 32-14 (1977). ALL nail biters, only lost by an average of 16 points per SB. A bounce here, a bounce there, a bad call here, a bad call there, they would be 4-0 in the games they last played in 47 years ago.
They have ONLY missed the playoffs in 6 of the last 10 years. They have even won 2 playoffs game in the last 10 years, they are one of the top teams who have a shot to win it all year in and year out, says nobody with a brain.
When I think of teams who I would be proud to be a fan of because they are known winners, it definitely would NOT be a team who last played in (not won) the super bowl, 47 years ago. A team who has NEVER won the big one, Yes Sir, that is the team I would praise.