The big difference is this is just Reeves 2nd year at Kentucky, with Cal, and with Cal's staff and some of the same teammates.. but, this is Roaches 4th year. If you ask me, there's a lot more room for growth for Reeves in COLLEGE than there is for Roach. Reevs has had his 20+ point games, he's also had his near FORTY pt games, hes been a leader, he has experience, and again, this is only his 2nd season at an elite program.
We've been over this, Proctor is in no way a sure fire future lottery pick. I explained to you that some mock drafts have him barely in the 1st round. There's a lot of ways to go before he's a top5 pick like some of you think.
And the end is ultimately my point, For whatever you think Roach is as a PG, this list was for SHOOTING GUARD, not GUARD. In no world is Roach a better SG, when that's not even the position he should be playing.. than Antonio Reeves, Kentucky's BEST player last year.
Edit: Roach being a 5* recruit kind of doesn't matter at this point. If you're a 5* recruit and still need 4 years of college ball, then you clearly were over ranked to some degree. Im not convinced that Roach is any better of a basketball player, or pro-prospect, than Reeves is, simply because of his ranking from 5 years ago. This isn't like comparing Reeves to a talent like Jayson Tatum.