Apparently not.
It isn't a disregard for generalities. You didn't speak in general terms. You picked one specific group to target. If you had spoken in generalities I wouldn't have said a thing.
I also didn't say that no owners had. I just said that you should direct your point towards the owners.
Do you see how stupid this is and how it has nothing to do with your original attempt at being cute for likes?
How none of your attempt answers your "I don't give a damn about the NBA" line and how that can't possibly fit in your "we should all help" attempt at walking it back?
Of course you do.
And the original thread was about Silver talking to the players about the league returning. Now it's apparently about LeBron James and black people. Thanks for opening the door and letting them in.
Likewise, did I specifically write that there were no cases of players giving to charity? To that question, the latitude you're extending to your own loose initial comment wasn't extended toward my comment. Why? Because you get to assume my complete view on this issue in addition to knowing your own?
How, specifically, is my comment about how "we should all help" a walk back? I thought it would be clear to anyone that I am making a point about how the NBA's current priority (plans for continuing the season) is out of lockstep with the country's priorities that come with joblessness, macrolevel bankruptcy, and small businesses failing. Thus, there is a connecting point that I still feel was clear - I
will give a damn when the NBA's collective priorities encompass the reality of the nation's current priorities.
Yet, I'll make my view more clear so you can have a satisfactory response to go to bed on:
- I don't think the general reality as experienced by professional sports players - or their team owners, or various other elites in the entertainment industry - is remotely similar to the realities of many of the people who are presently losing their jobs. I do think some of them have friends and family who are suffering. I also think some of them are quite charitable. I also think many of them are so out of touch and living in a different reality, that it makes my initial point- although critical and a bit compressed - quite valid.
My comment was written because
I do not think their professional priorities are relevant right now. Further, I think the only relevancy those members of the entertainment elite have to the current crisis is one of offering potential benevolence, charity, or ingenuity to help alleviate the current economic crisis - hence my reason for pointing out potential league charity and juxtaposing it against the baseness of the league's stated interests. Is that an imposition of value priorities on my part? Yes, but no more than your initial point about the owners.
That is why I "don't give a damn" about the priorities of NBA. I could also include MLB, NFL, their owners, and numerous others right now, if that helps.
To your last point, all I can write is "not really." I know you favor a degree of heavy censorship on this board (as you constantly advocate for the rest of us "blocking" certain posters who personally annoy you), but part of the progression of any thread - as you well know - is the further development of that topic's potential exponents. That doesn't always mean "hijacking" a thread as much as it often means "extending" one. We see this daily here. As for the association fallacy found at the end of your post - that's not particularly fair. I don't believe in playing a game of telephone and blaming the first guy in line for the failed interpretation by the subsequent people in line. Everyone on this board is responsible for their own comments.
Lastly, I edited this post out of respect for you and your history here. I'm okay with you disagreeing with my perspective toward NBA players, their league, and their league's priorities. I don't think the players are monsters; I just don't think their collective priority list (owners or players) features anything substantive in regards to alleviating the national crisis.