Would Lorton be the same player under Tubby like was at UT?
This is a valid question.
Lofton certainly would've gotten far less playing time here with the increased guard competition for minutes he'd have faced (Rajon Rondo, Jodie Meeks, Joe Crawford, Derrick Jasper, Patrick Sparks, Ramel Bradley, etc.).
And, frankly, Lofton had clear flaws to his game that Tubby would not've liked--a very poor defender, no point guard skills, limited handle, etc.--he really was sorta just a one-dimensional outside shooter. A superb shooter, yes, but still just a shooter--would that alone have been enough for Tubby (or Gillispie) to play him ahead of, for example, Jodie Meeks--who was also an ace shooter, but one with more size, athleticism and defense?
I think being rejected by UK may've been the best thing to happen to Lofton's career. Bruce Pearl gave him unlimited playing time and a system that fit his game like a glove. His career might've gone quite differently if he'd come here.
Last edited: