The University of Southern California Los Angeles has a bigger fanbase than the University of Kentucky. How many of them care about college basketball, however, is impossible to measure. I'm just going off fanbase numbers.
It means nobody even saw it. Few people even followed regular season college basketball ....and it wasn't on TV more than a couple times per year. Coaches lasted forever, and since there was no $$$$ involved in the sport (mostly), there was no real incentive to fire guys. Nobody at KU cared if Ted Owens went 1-11 vs Kentucky nor did they see any reason to cancel the series. Who cared?
But when Tubby and Gillespie struggle, Kentucky moves quickly to fire them. And they cancel the series with Kansas rather than have Bill Self keep ringing the register every year against them.
Dumb. The modern era in TV, tourney brackets, national recruiting, etc etc started early 80s. Plus you were alive then. If you are 15 and only remember the Cal era, then yes: use the 2010s.
So, Your arbitrary timelines are the only ones that are credible? Got it. Thanks
The University of Southern California Los Angeles has a bigger fanbase than the University of Kentucky. How many of them care about college basketball, however, is impossible to measure. I'm just going off fanbase numbers.
USCLA.....I like that. Combine both LA schools and they still can't match fanbases of either of us.Ugh. I would screw that up.
This, as a resident of Los Angeles, makes me shake my head. UCLA has a bigger fanbase than Kentucky, they just aren't as vocal about basketball.
Why would it leave a mark? Most of those came in the 1970s, before basketball was even on TV. In the past 30 years it's what, 7-5 Kentucky? And it'll be 7-6 with the loss you're about to get in 3 weeks.
Okay so your league has 1 game that was epic and now all the sudden you come over here and cut on the SEC? Might I remind you that the SEC has more titles than the BIG12 and more recent success in the NCAAT than the B12? When was the last time your league put two teams in the same FF? 1988 maybe? Who else in the B12 besides KU has won a title in the modern ERA?Jealous you can't play teams like that in the SEC? i don't know how you guys watch those League games. Y'all really need to bolt to the ACC or BIG. Like decades ago
There are 29k students at UK. There are 43k at UCLA. There are 4.4m people in Kentucky. There are 18m in Los Angeles alone.
Are UCLA fans apathetic? Absolutely. Do they care about football more than basketball? Most assuredly. Are UK fans more dedicated basketball fans? Without a doubt. But the comment was that UCLA fans can fit in a Kentucky backyard. There are more UCLA fans than UK fans. It isn't that difficult to understand. I get that you're global and travel better than anyone else. I get that UCLA fans root for whoever is good at the time when they aren't busy slamming tequila in sunglasses at Baja Sharkees. I never said they were better fans. I said they were more numerous.
Stay tuned. Wait til you see what happens when UK goes on the road. All these teams that "suck" go all pro as soon as UK is the opponent . they all play like their lives depend on it and we aren't talking about chumps either, the SEC has top notch athletes, what the league lacks is good coaching. When good athletes decide they want to play hard they do it. Problem is they only do it when a big name is in their gym.I don't think it hurts you either. I never bought into the "getting tougher thru conf play" stuff. Your team is what it is: good or bad.
But I'm talking only entertainment value. I tuned into some of your game vs. Ole Miss the other night and they coudln't even complete a pass into the post guy. It was pathetic. Football is impossible for you guys in the SEC, and hoops is pointless
Kiimo - you know I generally like your posts ,but this is a little off.This, as a resident of Los Angeles, makes me shake my head. UCLA has a bigger fanbase than Kentucky, they just aren't as vocal about basketball.
@KneeBurnsSince 1990 the SEC has 6 National Championships. The Big12 has 1.
There are 29k students at UK. There are 43k at UCLA. There are 4.4m people in Kentucky. There are 18m in Los Angeles alone.
Are UCLA fans apathetic? Absolutely. Do they care about football more than basketball? Most assuredly. Are UK fans more dedicated basketball fans? Without a doubt. But the comment was that UCLA fans can fit in a Kentucky backyard. There are more UCLA fans than UK fans. It isn't that difficult to understand. I get that you're global and travel better than anyone else. I get that UCLA fans root for whoever is good at the time when they aren't busy slamming tequila in sunglasses at Baja Sharkees. I never said they were better fans. I said they were more numerous.
Yeah, you're the same fanbase that said Missouri's fans would embarrass the SEC and called them METH-U. You guys said "you'll see, you will hate them ". We haven't heard a peep out of Mizzou fans. Now it's Iowa State that is really bad. Nice work.***Sorry, but if you had to deal with the Iowa State extremists of recent years, your blood would be boiling too.
They always and I mean ALWAYS make that claim - "KU ALWAYS gets the calls", "They LEAD the nation, or at least the conference in FTAs", "Or they at least lead in FTAs at home", etc, etc.
Yet, you go and show them facts such as KU was toward the bottom 3 in both of those categories in the conference and they ignore the facts.
Results in the NCAAT the last 26 years tells a different story.No, they couldn't say that. The Big 12 has been better in the computer ratings for ages. Including Sagarin's all-time ranking. It's not a blip, it's not a short term trend, and it's not debateable numerically.
Last year, the Big 12 was +5 better on average than the SEC per Sagarin. (Which correlates 95% to Vegas lines, so we know it's a good proxy). But when you took out Kentucky, that jumped to +7.
Since Kentucky cannot play itself, we can therefore conclude mathematically that your conf slate last year was on average 7 points worse per game. That is not conjecture. That is math.
And the BIG12.In the last 8 years, the American Conference has as many as the entire SEC.
Easy now, not everyone knows that. Ulismyman is still unaware of this fact. He still thinks the SEC is a top conference. Poor fella.I'm not debating Big 12 vs SEC with that. I was commenting moreso Big 12 vs other conferences. I think everyone knows the SEC has been weak for some time now.
Well I must apologize to my fellow UK fans. I was wrong. I thought UK fans were the worst in the world at blaming refs after every game. Yup, I was wrong.I'm not sure how you arrived at that. I think the bad calls were more or less even on both teams, but I frankly thought the refs sucked. In a game with that intensity level and that many pivotal plays each team will have a handful of 50:50's that go against them. There were more than a handful.
It's brought up because every time you fools witness your basketball team accomplish something of Merit you bring your happy a$$es over here to puff out your chest. Then we are forced to remind you that your program is STILL beneath UK.Honestly, you're the only fanbase who talks about long-ago history. At least that I've encountered. Nobody on the UCLA board brags about still having a 10-9 lead on us. Or Indiana being 7-6, or UNC being 6-5. I really only encounter the "all time series" stuff here.
I'm not saying that's good or bad. I'm not saying you're wrong to feel that way. Only that I don't see it elsewhere.
You guys talk about your dominance over all BIG12 teams, what's the difference? If KU had a 22-6 lead over UK you guys would make sure we knew that fact very often.Huh. Well then, I don't understand UNC's behavior either.
Fun fact: KU is 3-9 all time vs Notre Dame. That sounds hard to believe, until you realize they (like Kentucky) ran up a huge margin in the 1970s. I guess they can puff their chests out too if it makes them feel better.
Man, you have no idea just how wrong you are. If UCLA had a fanbase that was worth a dam they would attract more than 6k a game. You would have a hard time believing that they have 11 titles because those fans seem like they could care less. They might have more people that are fans of tge school but they don't have a sports fanbase that is anywhere near what UK has.This, as a resident of Los Angeles, makes me shake my head. UCLA has a bigger fanbase than Kentucky, they just aren't as vocal about basketball.
Huh, where did you get that? You just fabricated this bs. You asked if UNC fans brag about their lead over UK and a couple of people said yes now all the sudden that means we are ate up about it?Well, you're eaten up with UNC's dominance in your series so we're both in the same boat.