Great, another disingenuous liberal that asks rathole questions but never answers basic ones. No wonder deeee likes all your posts. And lol at "stout assertion", good lord that screams fanboy.
You asked a question I answered. Expansion of amnesty by EO is a liberal position. So is single payer. Like I said, your party is moving left, and she will go the way the wind blows, there is not an authentic bone in her body. The Chamber supports anmnesty for cheap labor, it suppresses wages and crowds low-end school.....and as we see all the talk about caring about the poor by the left is just populistic window dressing. It is good a few people on the right refuses to go along.
I've no idea why you want to dip into personalities. I presume EO means Everyone's Opinion. But I have a hard time squaring that with the number of employers who want it. "Everyone" doesn't really cover the territory. Employers. Chamber of Commerce. These are bastions of liberalism? It sounds like there are lots of people who aren't on the left who favor amnesty. So, I get confused. If amnesty is supported by people on the right and left, how is it a left position? Is amnesty a fringe position or a majority position?
Single payer would be the most rational method of dispensing health care. Why that is considered "liberal" is beyond me. The governments of Great Britain, Canada, and Australia are considered conservative and you'd get burst ear drums from the laughter of their office holders if you talked about getting rid of it. Why? Because it's cheaper and provides better health outcomes.