Sumrall is a no Brainer call. Send Stoops out and bring Sumrall in. Pay Stoops out.
This!! Smurall will be at a P4 Conference School next year IMO and it won't be UKWon’t happen and the timing will be off. He will be the, “what could have been” guy and we we still be Kentucky football.
I'd argue if you fire a guy who has made 8 straight bowl games after one 4 and 8 or maybe 5 and 7 season if we somehow beat UL, it would make the next guy wonder what happens if he gets off to a slow start n year 1.
This is Kentucky, not a top program.
Having said all that, I'd love to have a new coach. It's gotten stale and we aren't gonna win the SEC or a national title no matter what so maybe a new blood guy lucks out and makes the playoff once in 10 years. Stoops won't do it IMO.
He's full of it. Just a clownSounds like the same argument and excuse you were making for cal come on get off the Titanic
Sounds like the same argument and excuse you were making for cal come on get off the Titanic
What's the different with football expectations ?Never made that excuse for calipari. Basketball actually has high expectations and I was ready for cal to go years ago. Barnie was too big a wimp to do it and he hated cal. But you think he is gonna fire the guy he gets along with in the sport with low expectations?
Give me a break. I'm all for it if he does it but don't see it. It's more likely Stoops leaves on his own like cal did IMO.
What's the different with football expectations ?
I’ll throw out an answer. First, some posters immediately talk about “fans settling for mediocrity” anytime football history is mentioned. This answer includes history, but it also includes logic.What's the different with football expectations ?
We’ve been through this.Sumrall is a no Brainer call. Send Stoops out and bring Sumrall in. Pay Stoops out.
Come on. We can’t apply our basketball entitlement to the football program. Be realisticWhat's the different with football expectations ?
This is a HORRIBLE take.I'd argue if you fire a guy who has made 8 straight bowl games after one 4 and 8 or maybe 5 and 7 season if we somehow beat UL, it would make the next guy wonder what happens if he gets off to a slow start n year 1.
This is Kentucky, not a top program.
Having said all that, I'd love to have a new coach. It's gotten stale and we aren't gonna win the SEC or a national title no matter what so maybe a new blood guy lucks out and makes the playoff once in 10 years. Stoops won't do it IMO.
This is a HORRIBLE take.
So you don’t think we can get anybody better for 9 million? And by better I’m talking winning 8-9 games a year, a consistent top 25 team, and maybe running an offense that isn’t from 1970. I’m saying we most definitely can.No, it's reality. You and Jeff can fantasize about it but in a pro league with no salary cap where your team ranks 15th out of 16th in salary spent for mercenary players, it's a tough hill to climb.
So you don’t think we can get anybody better for 9 million? And by better I’m talking winning 8-9 games a year, a consistent top 25 team, and maybe running an offense that isn’t from 1970. I’m saying we most definitely can.
I agree with you about Barney. But with the right coach we sure can win that many.I never said we couldn't. My original post is what barney is thinking. I couldn't care less if Stoops is fired. I'd rather have anyone. We aren't gonna win 8 to 9 games a year though. Sec is too tough.
I’ll throw out an answer. First, some posters immediately talk about “fans settling for mediocrity” anytime football history is mentioned. This answer includes history, but it also includes logic.
UK does not have ANY history of football success in the last 75 years, except for Stoops’ success. Think about that for a second. In paper, Stoops guided us to our “golden period.”
College football has been dominated by the same 10-15 programs for the last 40 years. Someone will sneak into the list for a year, or maybe two, but they don’t last. (Ex - TCU)
Our conference (and thus our schedule) consists of 4-5 teams every year that have won a championship game in the last 25 years.
Our conference makes up about 70-75% of those programs that have dominated football in the last 25 years. Obviously, they haven’t all dominated at the same time. (Exs- Florida and Auburn).
Those are historical facts regardless of one’s fandom. Now, I do believe the NIL/transfer portal IS going to open up doors for more teams to break through glass ceilings. Teams that break through those ceilings may not be able to maintain a level of being a top program for the very reasons that helped them break through them in the first place.
I do believe UK can be one of those programs!!! But, doing it in the ACC will be much, much easier. Avoiding OSU and a couple top B10 teams will make it easier than UK.
Let’s face reality. Turing around the Florida, Aub, Tx, or UT should be much easier than UK.
I applaud Stoops for his accomplishments at UK. I honestly don’t know if he’s the man for the future. My question is not his ability but the energy needed to do everything that needs to be done to make UK better. He looks tired to me.
He doesn’t have the ability. There, I answered it for you.I’ll throw out an answer. First, some posters immediately talk about “fans settling for mediocrity” anytime football history is mentioned. This answer includes history, but it also includes logic.
UK does not have ANY history of football success in the last 75 years, except for Stoops’ success. Think about that for a second. In paper, Stoops guided us to our “golden period.”
College football has been dominated by the same 10-15 programs for the last 40 years. Someone will sneak into the list for a year, or maybe two, but they don’t last. (Ex - TCU)
Our conference (and thus our schedule) consists of 4-5 teams every year that have won a championship game in the last 25 years.
Our conference makes up about 70-75% of those programs that have dominated football in the last 25 years. Obviously, they haven’t all dominated at the same time. (Exs- Florida and Auburn).
Those are historical facts regardless of one’s fandom. Now, I do believe the NIL/transfer portal IS going to open up doors for more teams to break through glass ceilings. Teams that break through those ceilings may not be able to maintain a level of being a top program for the very reasons that helped them break through them in the first place.
I do believe UK can be one of those programs!!! But, doing it in the ACC will be much, much easier. Avoiding OSU and a couple top B10 teams will make it easier than UK.
Let’s face reality. Turing around the Florida, Aub, Tx, or UT should be much easier than UK.
I applaud Stoops for his accomplishments at UK. I honestly don’t know if he’s the man for the future. My question is not his ability but the energy needed to do everything that needs to be done to make UK better. He looks tired to me.
Never say never. Nobody thought Cal was gonna be gone this past basketball season either. (Not comparing Pope with Sumrall...just saying Stoops could end up gone as nobody thought Cal was gonna be)Won’t happen and the timing will be off. He will be the, “what could have been” guy and we we still be Kentucky football.
We don’t have to pay a new guy what we’re paying Stoops now. We could get Sumrall for half that or around 5-5.5 million. He’s making under 3 million at Tulane. Pope isn’t making what we paid Cal.So you don’t think we can get anybody better for 9 million? And by better I’m talking winning 8-9 games a year, a consistent top 25 team, and maybe running an offense that isn’t from 1970. I’m saying we most definitely can.
Oh for sure! I’m just using 9 million because obviously we have every bit of that to give. Pay Sumrall around what Pope is making and I’m sure he’d bust the door down to come here.We don’t have to pay a new guy what we’re paying Stoops now. We could get Sumrall for half that or around 5-5.5 million. He’s making under 3 million at Tulane. Pope isn’t making what we paid Cal.