Yeah we know you're surprised. This was a drive by thread built jist for you to drop in and say look how smart I am.I'm surprised no one has said "if it can happen to him, it can happen to you!" yet. That's a classic line that's been used in the recent past to stoke fear and try to get folks to stick up for national bullshitters. It's not hard being the opposite of someone like Alex Jones and I'm pretty confident that most Americans are disgusted by him.
“Don’t let your mouth write checks your ass can’t cash”
I have a very hard time with this feeling of Jones being a victim.
Cool. No one cares but you keep posting in the thread, even randomly throwing a weird, passive aggressive response my way. Gotcha. You really showed me. I guess...Yeah we know you're surprised. This was a drive by thread built jist for you to drop in and say look how smart I am.
Whats not surprising tho, is what you assumed other people would think and how off your perception of ppl is.
No one cares about Alex Jones.
Where ya been man? You get thrown out of the political thread? Takes a real loon to get thrown out of there !Cool. No one cares but you keep posting in the thread, even randomly throwing a weird, passive aggressive response my way. Gotcha. You really showed me. I guess...
If you want to "fight" with someone online, I'm not your guy. Internet fight with the poster right below you whose only contribution to the thread is to troll with "libs are scummy scum evil scum." I know that works in the political thread. Have a good one.
No, I would not.
I remember when you tried to act like a know it all cool guy when I said that Disney was having huge problems with controlling cost in all their divisions in a thread talking about espn and the carriage fees.... You thought it was nuts to not see Disney was the biggest media corp in the world and owned some of the best IP in the world.... then 6 months later the stock price hit a 20 year low and I never tried to call you out for your ignorance but it did show me how ignorant you are on topics that you pretend to be informed about.Cool. No one cares but you keep posting in the thread, even randomly throwing a weird, passive aggressive response my way. Gotcha. You really showed me. I guess...
If you want to "fight" with someone online, I'm not your guy. Internet fight with the poster right below you whose only contribution to the thread is to troll with "libs are scummy scum evil scum." I know that works in the political thread. Have a good one.
Actually it isn't.Sure but the legal answer is no
Actually it isn't.
Yes, you can yell 'fire' in a crowded theater
Though it is a popular misconception, it's perfectly legal to yell "fire" in a crowded theatre. However, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito hasn't seemedreason.com
I saw where Jones's brain went for $4.95 at the auction.
Well, it is Friday now and you're still wrong. Also, I have read the whole thread dude.Actually it isn't.
Yes, you can yell 'fire' in a crowded theater
Though it is a popular misconception, it's perfectly legal to yell "fire" in a crowded theatre. However, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito hasn't seemedreason.com
Except the Onion didn't have the money. The lawyers were going to screw over the parents in order to stick it to Jones. If you are pissed at Jones for his comments then you should be pissed at the lawyers ignoring their fiduciary responsibility for pure politics.The Onion buying InfoWars should be awesome... except The Onion apparently decided their key demographic is postmenopausal cat ladies a few years ago and they haven't made a successful joke since.
Your description of what’s happening is not even remotely accurate.Except the Onion didn't have the money. The lawyers were going to screw over the parents in order to stick it to Jones. If you are pissed at Jones for his comments then you should be pissed at the lawyers ignoring their fiduciary responsibility for pure politics.
Your description of what’s happening is not even remotely accurate.
It was a rigged show trial. He was allowed no defense. No matter what you think of him you should be outraged at what the justice system did in that trial … or just keep being a foolThe punishment for the Sandy Hook thing was too excessive.
You need to educate yourself. There were people awarded damages that had no children in that schoolNo, the issue is the magnitude of what he did, not his political affiliation.
The people he defamed were victims of something awful. Jones chose to intentionally and repeatedly lie about those victims because he knew he could make lots of money telling these lies.
When the victims repeatedly asked Jones to stop, he ignored them. When some of them were subjected to threats of violence because of his lies, he kept on lying because it was good for his business.
When Jones was sued by the people he was defaming, he then obstinately and repeatedly ignored court orders requiring him to cooperate with discovery.
When someone chooses to do awful and illegal things to make themselves rich, and arrogantly ignore court orders along the way, they open themselves up to heavy punishment.
Jones’ behavior was so far beyond the pale that a devastating financial penalty was worth considering. It was Jones’ actions that brought this upon himself, not any political affiliation.
The Trump - Crazy Hoe Trial (Carroll) was worse.It was a rigged show trial. He was allowed no defense. No matter what you think of him you should be outraged at what the justice system did in that trial … or just keep being a fool
Pretty much.Thanks for letting us know that we should be outraged over what happened to Alex Jones. I'll really take that to heart tonight and be very outraged over the system being very unfair to Jones. Yes, I'll definitely hitch my wagon to that idea and die on that hill, ya know, for Alex Jones.
Just pointing out it wasn't about getting the parents paid for liable. It was always about shutting him down. It's not going to work and will actually have the opposite effect. But I guess you guys can cheer that some lawyers screwed over the parents just to stick it to Info Wars. AlexJones.com is already up and running supposedly. It's amazing how badly some people want censorship.Pretty much.
Just pointing out it wasn't about getting the parents paid for liable. It was always about shutting him down. It's not going to work and will actually have the opposite effect. But I guess you guys can cheer that some lawyers screwed over the parents just to stick it to Info Wars. AlexJones.com is already up and running supposedly. It's amazing how badly some people want censorship.
But I'm still hearing The Onion might be in trouble for trying to get this deal done with no money.
Your description of what’s happening is not even remotely accurate.
The judge hasn’t stopped the transaction. The judge was unhappy with how the process was handled, in particular, he was not happy with some of the lack of transparency.
OK. It's way different than I said.The judge hasn’t stopped the transaction. The judge was unhappy with how the process was handled, in particular, he was not happy with some of the lack of transparency.
Therefore, the judge has paused things to hold a hearing on how the process was handled by the trustee and to understand the bids that were submitted.
At that point, if the judge is satisfied, he’ll approve the Onion’s bid. If he’s not satisfied, he won’t.
Your characterization of things is not accurate.
How much was the Onion’s bid? And to what extent were the Sandy Hook families involved?OK. It's way different than I said.
The Onions bid was zero dollars of current money. They offered profits off the future gains. I haven't heard a single family member say they don't care about the money they just want to mock AJ. If that's what they want then that's fine by me... but it looks like the lawyers went into this with a plan and used the families to shut down InfoWars.How much was the Onion’s bid? And to what extent were the Sandy Hook families involved?