Those coaches might not be any better, but they will surely be different with the chance of being better. Cal seems to be getting crazier by the day so these players know exactly what they will get from him and they no long want it.
Why would UK allow reeves back on campus?
- Thread starter mdlUK.1
- Start date
Again, since you are slow, show me one post where I have trashed a player. If reeves wants to transfer, more power to him. Just go ahead and do it.
How would that look for the University? I think Cal would support it but will try to get him to stay the whole time he is at UK.
More power to him is your statement as you advocate for blocking his graduation. You are worse than your mentor.
Don’t think it would be a big deal if he finishes up as a normal student. But if his intent is to graduate to transfer, I don’t think he should be able to use UK to get some NIL and use the facilities.
Penny isn’t going to make him any better that much I know.
So the one and done's can return to get their degrees but with Reeves we'll make an exception? Seriously?
It doesn't matter if you know or just believe it. Obviously, the players who are running from the program don't believe it.
It is obvious why you like having your nose buried up Cal's butt. I am ignoring you because you have the IQ of a rock and unworthy of anymore of my time.
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh if you treat someone like that, other people see it and it deters many from wanting to get into a possible situation like that........meaning they dont come here.
After all, Cal's NIL stance and his culture he built is the problem, not Reeves doing whats best for him.
After all, Cal's NIL stance and his culture he built is the problem, not Reeves doing whats best for him.
Sharpe never played. It's not even close to the same thing. I'm not sure how you could be that obtuse.
Fail to plan, plan to fail. This isn't about the decision of a 20 something but rather the decision of UK staff not to pursue a contingency.
Do what u can for players in the fold committed to UK. However, just like a player doesn't have an allegiance to UK during the draft process, the program has no obligation to not recruit for their position.
Emphasis needs to be on program over player. We are UK!!!
'We' are not UK, so 'we' don't need to get upset about the decision of a 20 something that hasn't happened yet.
It's really pretty simple, roster building isn't finished, Cal said that this morning too. Wring your hands or wait to see the results, your choice I guess.
This is my way of thinking as well Jonathan. If his scholly doesn't extend to summer classes, then make him pay his own way, but don't tell him he's not welcome back.
Kind of a fine line I guess, but damn, we need bodies and we need shooters.
He hasn't said he is leaving. Do you do the guilty until proven innocent deal ? It's reported he may look around. He hasn't entered the portal. Odeyenso actually went to the portal, nobody bashed him. Reeves is just trying to see what the most NIL money he is worth. He knows he probably doesn't have a NBA future so he is just looking out for his best financial gain. Can't knock that. If UK ends up better than others offer he will be back. It was said he made over $100k at UK. If he is not guaranteed more at another school he will be back at UK. After his year last year I would think he could make a lot more at UK than last years figure. He was not a sure thing last year moving up to a power 5 school. He has proved he can play against the big boys. I do not buy the affraid of losing minutes BS. He averaged over 30 mpg on a deeper team last year.
Similar threads
