It's not just a matter of offering the Head Coach a big contract. You have to pony up for the assistants as well if you want to attract a HC worth a damn. In another thread it was well stated how UK handcuffed Curry by forcing him to go cheap on assistants. A HC is a CEO type. The real coaching and recruiting is done by the staff. The HC success will be determined by the success of his staff.
I don't know if Lane still has the same connections, but that one year he was at UT he brought in the most expensive staff in the country. I will say that about Lane, he knew how to build a staff. I was surprised the UT AD went along with it, considering how Fulmer complained about that very issue when he was HC. Lane's dad was paid well over a million a year. Guys like Orgegron(sp?) was paid almost a million per, and he was a position coach.
UK will have to give the HC a blank checkbook so he can hire whoever he wants to hire. UK can't put handcuffs on a new coach. No proven HC candidate will go there if UK pulls that stunt again.