…after they changed goaltend to block, when UK got the rebound?
You can't explain insanity.Espn didn't find it prudent to explain it.
Which is why the rule is so obnoxiously bad. You HAVE to immediately review it and treat it like the fumble rule where if there is a clear recovery it goes to that team and id not use the possession arrow. The way it is it simply punishes a team for the refs incompetence.They called the goaltend and so Ole Miss got the ball. They didn’t take the goaltend away until the next dead ball. Too late to give us the ball then.
You can't explain insanity.
And that is twice it went against us. SmhWhich is why the rule is so obnoxiously bad. You HAVE to immediately review it and treat it like the fumble rule where if there is a clear recovery it goes to that team and id not use the possession arrow. The way it is it simply punishes a team for the refs incompetence.
No, and I've watched a game where a similar play happened and they reviewed it immediately, waived off the goal tend and then gave it back to the offense because they clearly recovered it. Which just makes the whole scenario even more maddening since we've been shafted twice now.Can you name a team that has been penalized more by goaltends than us?
It blows my mind how announcers today RARELY tell what is going on in the game!!! They will barely tell WHO received the foul and how many that player has!!Espn didn't find it prudent to explain it.
I get the sentiment but the ice cream thing is just a meme Jay plays up to get some free soft serve.It blows my mind how announcers today RARELY tell what is going on in the game!!! They will barely tell WHO received the foul and how many that player has!!
They would rather talk about the Soft Serve ice cream at Rupp that ANYBODY could get at their local Dairy Queen.
ESPN SUCKS!!!
Whoever put that rule is in incompetent and stupidWhich is why the rule is so obnoxiously bad. You HAVE to immediately review it and treat it like the fumble rule where if there is a clear recovery it goes to that team and id not use the possession arrow. The way it is it simply punishes a team for the refs incompetence.
Auburn got the ball after a wrong goal tending call was made against Alabama and they rebounded it. Should have gone to UK.…after they changed goaltend to block, when UK got the rebound?
Ole Miss got the ball and kept the possession arrow, according to what I was seeing on the screen. I suppose it's possible that the arrow got reversed after a few minutes and I didn't notice, I doubt it though. That whole scenario is just deflating when it happens.I think it was alternate possession.
Ole Miss got the opening tip.
UK got a held ball at 12:05.
Then the Reed play/goaltend gave it back to Ole Miss.
But if you look at the live stats on UK's site, it doesn't show the possession changed (it just says missed layup).
I thought all this happened immediately after the play (dead ball on the goaltending call).They called the goaltend and so Ole Miss got the ball. They didn’t take the goaltend away until the next dead ball. Too late to give us the ball then.
But what if the team getting the ball already has the possession arrow in its favor. Do they get it twice before changing it?Which is why the rule is so obnoxiously bad. You HAVE to immediately review it and treat it like the fumble rule where if there is a clear recovery it goes to that team and id not use the possession arrow. The way it is it simply punishes a team for the refs incompetence.
If its a clear recovery, they don't lose possession arrow. If it isn't then they do lose it. At least that is how it should work. They don't do anything consistently as it stands.But what if the team getting the ball already has the possession arrow in its favor. Do they get it twice before changing it?
Yes it did. The possession arrow was with OM. The arrow switched after the inbounds.Possession arrow didn’t change
…after they changed goaltend to block, when UKy was going to ask the same thing. Did we at least get the possession arrow off that b? Yes?
Yeah, I was going to ask the same thing. Did we at least get the possession arrow? I mean, they call goaltending. Our guy has an easy rebound and put back. Forget about the put back. We definitely would have had the ball and then all the sudden they reversed and they get the ball. That is some bullshit. I think the second time this year it has happened to us. Horrible rule either way.…after they changed goaltend to block, when UK got the rebound?
Possession arrow didn’t change
We got the ball to start the second half. They did change the possession arrow.Ole Miss got the ball and kept the possession arrow, according to what I was seeing on the screen. I suppose it's possible that the arrow got reversed after a few minutes and I didn't notice, I doubt it though. That whole scenario is just deflating when it happens.
Unless it is UK and they change the call 5 minutes later and screw us over by taking the basket away after the fact.Im thinking after they blow the call they go to the alternating possession to correct their blown call. Which in this case just blows.
They called the goaltend and so Ole Miss got the ball. They didn’t take the goaltend away until the next dead ball. Too late to give us the ball then.
It did. The goaltending was called and at that dead ball it was the tv timeout. They had changed the score to 20-21 as they were going to commercial.I thought all this happened immediately after the play (dead ball on the goaltending call).
Maybe we could exploit this to our advantage in the future. Nah, refs would still screw us.Which is why the rule is so obnoxiously bad. You HAVE to immediately review it and treat it like the fumble rule where if there is a clear recovery it goes to that team and id not use the possession arrow. The way it is it simply punishes a team for the refs incompetence.
Ole Miss got the ball and kept the possession arrow, according to what I was seeing on the screen. I suppose it's possible that the arrow got reversed after a few minutes and I didn't notice, I doubt it though. That whole scenario is just deflating when it happens.
Exactly. We had the rebound and a putback. If they hadn't made a bad call, we still would have had those 2 points. As it ended up, we lost the 2 and possession of ball. It is exactly as you say, punishing our team for the referees' incompetence.Which is why the rule is so obnoxiously bad. You HAVE to immediately review it and treat it like the fumble rule where if there is a clear recovery it goes to that team and id not use the possession arrow. The way it is it simply punishes a team for the refs incompetence.
This has happened to us twice now this year, correct?They called the goaltend and so Ole Miss got the ball. They didn’t take the goaltend away until the next dead ball. Too late to give us the ball then.
Exactly. Twice this has happened. Crazy!Cost us the Texas A&M game.