Wow, if you think that Teague and Bledsoe had those issues to a comparable degree as Goodwin, then I have to question what the hell you were watching.
Let's lay out some facts: Marquis Teague has 82 more assists than turnovers during his year at UK, Goodwin on the other hand had 13 more turnovers than assists, that's a 95 point differential in their assist/turnover count. Teague played like a true point focused primarily on defense and distributing, whereas Goodwin played like a wild eyed gunner who often looked obsessed with his own points over everything else (and, yes, he looked like that before Nerlens injury too, so I'm sick of hearing that excuse). Just completely different types of guards.
It is true that Teague was also a fan whipping boy for awhile (although much of it undeserved) and he did make plenty of mistakes early on. BUT one criticism you never heard was anyone calling him selfish, because Teague never looked like a selfish player. Instead he looked like a player who was always at least trying to find his teammates, even if he was making some mistakes while doing so. Conversely, Archie often looked like a guy who either ignored or did not see his teammates at all. When Wiltjer was spotted up wide open in 2012, Teague made sure he got the pass. In that same situation in 2013 Wiltjer would frequently find himself ignored as Archie instead put his head down and forked up another off balance shot with two defenders all over him. THAT'S the fundamental difference between the way those guys played.
