Serious question. What makes you think fans getting pissed could or should supercede the university's admission criteria?We should be pissed. Don’t know what we can do about it other than yell on a msg board.
Christ, point missed.Schools everywhere have treated athletes differently. If you don't know this i dont know where you've been. I'm not sure why you're trying to take the academic high and mighty road.
The athletic advantage: Unfairness in college admissions
After countless hours of staring at your computer, attempting to push through your college essays, you take a break to scroll through Instagram when a new story pops up. The words, “I’m so excited to announce my commitment to _____ University to further my athletic career!” appears while the...redwoodbark.org
I agree but it is also very possible as well that Cal has worked here over a decade and should know red flags for the admin and had some talks about things before moving forward.It's very possible that Cal and company were given an almost sure notice that he was good to go from the admin office (and based on prior experience didn't expect any issue). Then a very small detail crept in and some curmudgeon in UK's Administration is making a big stink about it (which is sadly VERY common in academic bureaucracy, really in any bureaucracy, you'd be surprised at the amount of Napoleon syndrome that runs rampant in them).
This is all on UK's Admin. No more, no less.
Point missed is right. UK and nearly every other university bend the rules for athletes. Get over yourself.Christ, point missed.
And taking the high road with academics? People gripe at a fraud UNC on this board but you are okay with bending the rules for an athlete when clearly something is not within the guidelines in this situation?
Pick a lane.
And if Duke or Michigan takes him, then what? Those schools have HIGHER admissions standards than Kentucky.Serious question. What makes you think fans getting pissed could or should supercede the university's admission criteria?
Some of you are acting like this would be the first time in history that one school could not admit an athlete under its standard rules. If an athlete doesn't literally qualify, the school can go the extra mile by considering special circumstances. Apparently that is happening here. But this is not actually so uncommon. Many SEC schools have admitted athletics who could not get admitted to Vanderbilt. Many ACC schools have admitted athletes who could not get admitted to UVA. Under the standard admission criteria, not every out of state applicant can be admitted to Kentucky. Do we want any athlete from eastern Europe admitted to Kentucky because Cal wants him? Let's stop thinking like Cal.
Who screwed up here? Most coaches are wise enough not to publicize a commitment or formally offer a scholarship until he knows the athlete can be admitted to the school. But our coach thinks he iz running an independent semipro franchise.
LOL, they are not going to be "more than okay" if Z is not a part of things. There won't be any real depth under the basket worth a darn.They should be more than ok if Bradshaw and Onyenso are both healthy, but it would be nice to have another in case.
Bradshaw, Onyenso and Mitchell is a pretty damn good core. Mitchell played all alone in Canada. Imagine adding two seven footers? Four would be better, but let’s not act like there’s nothing down low.LOL, they are not going to be "more than okay" if Z is not a part of things. There won't be any real depth under the basket worth a darn.
Bradshaw is fragile. Onyenso isn't going to much better than last year. Just watch. Mitchell will be the star of those three.Bradshaw, Onyenso and Mitchell is a pretty damn good core. Mitchell played all alone in Canada. Imagine adding two seven footers? Four would be better, but let’s not act like there’s nothing down low.
Why if they let him in will they have to do it to someone else? Those rules were never followed by anyone else. He would not be the first athlete that had some slack cut for him. Won’t be the last.I agree with you and I think that some of the rules UK has can be rigid, but if they do that for him, then they have to do that for everyone. As much as that is a negative, the positive is that our admissions office doesn’t skate the rules and won’t bend for anyone — again, we don’t want academic fraud.
We love UK, we are proud that we aren’t other institutions, and we should never bend or break our rules or we become those fraud institutions.
Does this suck, though? Terribly. I want to see this kid here and I want us to kick everyone’s @ss this year. Badly. We fans deserve that especially with the price tag coming with that coach.
Isn't the UK administration answerable to the governor's office? It might be time to bring politics into athletics...
Not sure about Michigan, but Duke is out of scholarships. I saw on Twitter the other day that they have 13 players on scholarship.And if Duke or Michigan takes him, then what? Those schools have HIGHER admissions standards than Kentucky.
That will look awful for UK.
You blame Cal because you want to. All coaches announce big commits when they get them. SmhI am blaming Cal for this one. He signed this kid and told everyone he was good to go before even getting this kid cleared with admissions. That’s like writing a paper and not proof reading it before turning it in to your professor.
Cal knows the admission criteria for UK. He also knows what rules they can bend and which ones they can’t. At least he should know, since that information has direct ties to recruiting. But I think he does know, because he didn’t have these issues (with UK admissions) with Kanter, Murray, SGA, Skal, or any other foreign born player but now all of sudden Cal forgot how to get a kid admitted? Doubtful.
Those guys you list aren’t comparable because they played high school basketball in the US or were from English speaking countries. I think this is the first guy we have signed (ever?) that did not play high school basketball in the US and comes from a country where English isn’t their native language.I am blaming Cal for this one. He signed this kid and told everyone he was good to go before even getting this kid cleared with admissions. That’s like writing a paper and not proof reading it before turning it in to your professor.
Cal knows the admission criteria for UK. He also knows what rules they can bend and which ones they can’t. At least he should know, since that information has direct ties to recruiting. But I think he does know, because he didn’t have these issues (with UK admissions) with Kanter, Murray, SGA, Skal, or any other foreign born player but now all of sudden Cal forgot how to get a kid admitted? Doubtful.
Name ONE other time UK admissions has been an issue for a basketball recruit under Cal’s tenure.You blame Cal because you want to. All coaches announce big commits when they get them. Smh
I just haven’t heard of the UK admissions department giving our basketball department a hard time before this. I do realize this player has a unique circumstance but even with the most comparable players they presented no issues.Those guys you list aren’t comparable because they played high school basketball in the US or were from English speaking countries. I think this is the first guy we have signed (ever?) that did not play high school basketball in the US and comes from a country where English isn’t their native language.
My guess would be because he speaks English so well, Cal never in a million years thought he would not pass this test that the university has.
Show me where I said that UK admissions has been an issue before. Sorry if an abbreviation is upsetting to you.Name ONE other time UK admissions has been an issue for a basketball recruit under Cal’s tenure.
Just one. Or shake your head at the teenage girl you stole that abbreviation from.
Yeah you definitely didn’t. Because they haven’t been an issue before with a recruit.Show me where I said that UK admissions has been an issue before. Sorry if an abbreviation is upsetting to you.
Again, I never mentioned anything about UK admissions. SMHYeah you definitely didn’t. Because they haven’t been an issue before with a recruit.
So you think they’re the problem because you want to, and not based on historical precedent.
Here’s the way I see it: Cal has dropped the ball recruiting several times. UK admissions never. So why on earth would I jump to the conclusion that admissions is the problem.
Talk how you want. I just think it’s silly for grown men using the language of girls in junior high.
Ok. Clarify your position for me then. Because at this point I’m not sure you said anything. You have made it very clear how young and hip you are thoughAgain, I never mentioned anything about UK admissions. SMH
Son, if you can’t comprehend what I wrote, I’m not going to waste my time trying to explain it to you. SMDHOk. Clarify your position for me then. Because at this point I’m not sure you said anything. You have made it very clear how young and hip you are though
Admissions lets players in all the time who normally would not be admitted into the university based on their grades, test scores, etc. bc they are deemed eligible by NCAA standards. I’ve not seen anything that says this kid isn’t eligible by NCAA standards. Imo, if he’s eligible to play by NCAA standards, he should be admitted into the university imo.I just haven’t heard of the UK admissions department giving our basketball department a hard time before this. I do realize this player has a unique circumstance but even with the most comparable players they presented no issues.
This isn’t a case of the boy who cried wolf. The admissions department, as it relates to basketball, has never raised a fuss at all before. And I haven’t seen any argument, supported by facts, that says they have. So when they say there’s an issue with the kid getting into UK, I will take them on their word.
Cal on the other hand has lied to me, and the rest of the fanbase, more times than I care to count.
It’s ok though, I realize I’m in the minority here. But this is just how I see it.
Yeah I would have an issue with the latter. But since that hasn’t happened yet I’m not going to stress over it now. All I know is Cal has never had an issue with the admissions department before so I’m hesitant to put the blame on them now.Admissions lets players in all the time who normally would not be admitted into the university based on their grades, test scores, etc. bc they are deemed eligible by NCAA standards. I’ve not seen anything that says this kid isn’t eligible by NCAA standards. Imo, if he’s eligible to play by NCAA standards, he should be admitted into the university imo.
I’m not sure what’s going on. If he doesn’t get into UK and never plays college ball anywhere, I won’t have a huge issue with it. If he doesn’t get into UK and then gets into another university with more rigid admissions standards, I’ll have an issue with it.
Whatever you say dad. This behavior is why mom left you though.Son, if you can’t comprehend what I wrote, I’m not going to waste my time trying to explain it to you. SMDH
Let me get this straight. You’re happy I’m no longer banging your mother? You are special.Whatever you say dad. This behavior is why mom left you though.
It helps if you learn them young. Kids are much better at learning languages than adultsI love languages (including coding languages). Learning 1 extra is hard. 3 extra is impressive for ANYONE. Sure, a lot of them (especially the Romance and Germanic languages) have similarities that transfer, but that's still 3 separate lexicons you have to know and have situational contexts.
I would have preferred a two parent household but you drove mom away. It’s more accurate to say she stopped banging you, but I know it’s important for your mental health to see it the way you do.Let me get this straight. You’re happy I’m no longer banging your mother? You are special.
LOL he's going in the draft next year, fact. Nice try.To be honest, I don’t really care about the big z. We never heard of this kid until we were told he was coming to UK. Then this board acted like we just became an elite team. not just FF bond but title game bond. No one really know jack about z. It would have probably taken 3 years to develop him and he’ll be gone after one ready or not. Him not being at UK mean one thing to me, and thats one less thing to b!tch about when we get tossed in the second round.
They could also just talk to him.Sandy Bell and her team are the best compliance team in America. The academic credentials of any player at UK over the years has nothing to do with this. When ANY UK sport start’s recruiting a foreign athlete that does not have English as his/her first language, that individual is told by compliance which test must be taken. The coaches know this too. The second they starting recruiting z they should have had him taking the one that was needed. This should never been an issue.
You can either believe this or not, but his not even coming to the states yet (that I'm aware of) lends credence to Jones explanation.I just haven’t heard of the UK admissions department giving our basketball department a hard time before this. I do realize this player has a unique circumstance but even with the most comparable players they presented no issues.
This isn’t a case of the boy who cried wolf. The admissions department, as it relates to basketball, has never raised a fuss at all before. And I haven’t seen any argument, supported by facts, that says they have. So when they say there’s an issue with the kid getting into UK, I will take them on their word.
Cal on the other hand has lied to me, and the rest of the fanbase, more times than I care to count.
It’s ok though, I realize I’m in the minority here. But this is just how I see it.
I appreciate the link but my opinion on this topic isn’t born from ignorance of the opposing side’s viewpoint. I just don’t agree that UK admissions is the problem. They’ve never been a thorn in Cal’s side before so I don’t see why people think they just woke up one day and decided to try and screw Cal, our team, and the fans over by doing this.You can either believe this or not, but his not even coming to the states yet (that I'm aware of) lends credence to Jones explanation.