I'm not qualified to know what any assistant coach brings to the table, but we wouldn't bring in a failed coach to coach us, so where is the logic to bring in a failed coach to be an assistant?
I didn't agree with that when Tubby brought in Hobbs, and I certainly don't agree with it now.
I understand that in order to be a head coach somewhere they had to be a great assistant at one time, but now they have to go from being a decision maker to the guy that follows orders, that implements a system that isn't his own (and likely isn't fully committed to) not to mention the pay cut, the additional work that he deems beneath him
and its likely why they aren't hired anywhere else in a top tier program except for a former friend or mentor.
so I have nothing against Barbee or Flint, they might be great assistant coaches for all I know, but I"m totally against the idea of bringing in a failed former coach that is expected to be high energy and full of fire.
Actually successful assistant coaches should;
- be loyal to the head coach and program.
- constantly interact with other coaches and players.
- help balance out the head coaches demeanor aka good cop bad cop.
- help sell the program to potential players, parents, fans and students.
- NEVER undermined the head coach in front of the team, if they disagree do this in private.
- always look for ways to improve the team (assistants see little things the head coach may not see in 1 on 1 works outs or individual position work outs).
- individual 1 on 1 workouts that work around the student athletes schedule.
- 1st at practice last to leave.
- innovative and creative and willing to think out side the box.
- break down film on games, very assistant will be more specialized in certain positions.
- pay attention in games to help find weakness in the other teams game (backdoor cuts, foul trouble players ect).
- help create energy for the team.
- eyes and ears for the head coach for on court as well as off court issues.
- help keep team chemistry
- HELP DEVELOPE players