42% from 3….. I don’t have the whole team % but where did Dayton land on the season as team for 3 point % ? Would he be one to go after ?
That’s pretty impressive!As a team they were 3rd in the country at around 40%
Sounds good but to be honest it’s happening to about every team.I'll be there next weekend... I'll ask around.
The interesting thing that will happen with programs like this is that the young men that do go there will really appreciate being there and having the scholarship.I'm guessing Dayton has a VERY LIMITED NIL budget. These guys know they'll probably never play in the NBA.
Now is their chance to make $ playing basketball, and play on a platform that creates more future opportunities.
I'm not opposed to NIL. But, It'll devastate programs like Dayton.
Don’t forget, Dayton was going to be a #1 seed the year tourn got cancelled. (I think!)The interesting thing that will happen with programs like this is that the young men that do go there will really appreciate being there and having the scholarship.
For instance, my son has low level D1 offers in soccer, and he’s elated with that! If more and more players avoid more and more programs because they can’t get paid, then there will be more opportunity for fringe D1 basketball players and the programs will be better for having them in many ways. And it’s not like Dayton was ever going to win a title regardless of the era.
I think it's pretty simple: NIL payday. Brea is getting A LOT of attention, and probably having some bags thrown his way. Mid-major "stars" are honestly the guys most likely to get paid in the portal
The interesting thing that will happen with programs like this is that the young men that do go there will really appreciate being there and having the scholarship.
For instance, my son has low level D1 offers in soccer, and he’s elated with that! If more and more players avoid more and more programs because they can’t get paid, then there will be more opportunity for fringe D1 basketball players and the programs will be better for having them in many ways. And it’s not like Dayton was ever going to win a title regardless of the era.
A friend went there in the 60s. Came to Louisville during the Don May Final Four. They had the immortal Glinder Torraine against Lew Alcindor.It’s Dayton……
It certainly won't help.I'm guessing Dayton has a VERY LIMITED NIL budget. These guys know they'll probably never play in the NBA.
Now is their chance to make $ playing basketball, and play on a platform that creates more future opportunities.
I'm not opposed to NIL. But, It'll devastate programs like Dayton.
As somebody stated earlier, these schools will start having access to high school kids they didn't have access to before. When schools take more transfers than freshmen, the number of freshman recruits to the higher level schools will open the doors to these schools for them, but then those kids that pan out will just transfer up in a year or two. Schools like Dayton will become feeder schools.in a few short years the nil/portal will reduce smaller schools to high school level basketball if things stay as they are
A coaching change ? We lost 6 guys who was committed from high school and couple / few that was not freshman transferred and / or followed their previous coach who recruited them. But a coaching change was the direct effect of all of them, except maybe Bradshaw, Burks and Hart, they may have still transferred even if Cal was still here.What's going on at UK, our entire roster turned over
Continuity, roster development, upside.Why even bother with recruiting out of high school. Assemble a roster in April one you know what you need and
get a good balanced team . Can’t really bring in 12 guys expecting to start though.
It is now about how much they can get paid for playing CBB. Very few care about the school they go too. If changes are not made with the NIL there are going to be a lot of smaller schools that will be hard to put players on the floor.
Well yeah, we have had an almost new roster every year. Now it's everybodyA coaching change ? We lost 6 guys who was committed from high school and couple / few that was not freshman transferred and / or followed their previous coach who recruited them. But a coaching change was the direct effect of all of them, except maybe Bradshaw, Burks and Hart, they may have still transferred even if Cal was still here.
He was talking about the OFF season. We do not normally lose 5 incoming recruits BEFORE they arrive, we lose after a year, not before the year. HUGE difference. Even signing more portal guys, with the talent we had coming in, we wouldn't not have had to be so hectic in the portal and could have been a lot more selective. We could have really use Fland, JQ, a couple others at least and the best part is, they would not have had to play 25-30 minutes a game, they could progress at a normal freshman pace. I am glad we will not have to depend on 6 freshman every year, but also do not want to try and fill a roster with ALL portal guys every year either. MY opinion, I truly think Karter Knox will be very good, most on here are not that high on him, I am. I love his game and how it has transformed to a more three level scorer. His shooting is getting better every day, he is no longer JUST a attack the rim player.Well yeah, we have had an almost new roster every year. Now it's everybody
the problem with you analogy is Walmart doesn't need mom and pop,Sounds exactly like capitalism, which is the system we all favor correct? Think of Dayton as the mom and pop grocery store and UK as Walmart.
It’s worse than the NBA, because the NBA has structure and clearly understood rules that everyone respects and follows. College basketball does not, it’s now basically free for all anarchy.College is the new nba and mid majors are the new g-league
the problem with you analogy is Walmart doesn't need mom and pop,
College athletics needs to field teams that are competitive.
a few are. we'll see about the restAnd they are doing that now, right?