I work with a few die hard UNC fans and have recently talked to them about the state of their program. They are deeply concerned about Hubert Davis' ability to take UNC to the tournament this year. I asked two of them, "Do you think you guys can beat Duke this year?" One of them responded, "We're not even thinking about that. We're worried if we can even make the tournament. Davis is done after this year."
UNC takes on UCLA this afternoon in New York, and the 10-1 Bruins could turn a 6-5 UNC team into a 6-6 team by the time the day is over.
Looking at UNC's schedule, there are very few opportunities for quality wins. Obviously they get UCLA, and then top 15 NET Pitt (twice), Duke (twice), and head on the road against Clemson. What if they lose 4 or 5 of those? They'll obviously drop some additional games in addition to those games. I could see a minimum of 10 losses before the ACC tourney begins, and potentially 12-13 losses.
Does a 21-13 with zero quality wins get an NCAA birth, because that's roughly where I think UNC will finish the season.
UNC takes on UCLA this afternoon in New York, and the 10-1 Bruins could turn a 6-5 UNC team into a 6-6 team by the time the day is over.
Looking at UNC's schedule, there are very few opportunities for quality wins. Obviously they get UCLA, and then top 15 NET Pitt (twice), Duke (twice), and head on the road against Clemson. What if they lose 4 or 5 of those? They'll obviously drop some additional games in addition to those games. I could see a minimum of 10 losses before the ACC tourney begins, and potentially 12-13 losses.
Does a 21-13 with zero quality wins get an NCAA birth, because that's roughly where I think UNC will finish the season.