Why? Because UK's last 14 games WWLWWLWWLWWLWW. We win two and lose one. If the pattern were to stay true we lose to Missouri and then we win at Kansas and at Tennessee. Hopefully we will break that pattern.
No.Well actually there is a 50% chance of winning each game. One winner and one loser. So the chance is slightly higher than 1%.
However I understand what you mean, will be extremely tough to win in Lawrence. But, we are playing better, so who knows...
Well actually there is a 50% chance of winning each game. One winner and one loser. So the chance is slightly higher than 1%.
However I understand what you mean, will be extremely tough to win in Lawrence. But, we are playing better, so who knows...
Why? Because UK's last 14 games WWLWWLWWLWWLWW. We win two and lose one. If the pattern were to stay true we lose to Missouri and then we win at Kansas and at Tennessee. Hopefully we will break that pattern.
I can see that happening.I predict early foul trouble for Poy and Lee and/or someone else
ya feel me on that ?
Zero chance UK loses to Missouri. Zero.Why? Because UK's last 14 games WWLWWLWWLWWLWW. We win two and lose one. If the pattern were to stay true we lose to Missouri and then we win at Kansas and at Tennessee. Hopefully we will break that pattern.
I don't think we lose to Mizzou either - at worst we have a poor showing because we're looking ahead; say, win by 8 instead of 18+.I can see us losing at Kansas and beating Mizzu, but I highly doubt we lose to Mizzu at home. They are pretty bad.
So if Golden State played William & Mary they'd have a 50% chance of winning?Well actually there is a 50% chance of winning each game. One winner and one loser. So the chance is slightly higher than 1%.
However I understand what you mean, will be extremely tough to win in Lawrence. But, we are playing better, so who knows...
LOL technically that's trueSo if Golden State played William & Mary they'd have a 50% chance of winning?
No.
Playing a game is not flipping a coin. There are no naturally even odds for both sides. When Roger Federer plays a guy in the 1st round of a tennis tournament, that guy doesn't have a 50% chance of winning just because he's on the same court. He has almost no chance of winning. Same for Missouri, because they're just not good at all.
MIssouri has about the same chance to win that game as I have of getting a date with Jessica Alba.Why? Because UK's last 14 games WWLWWLWWLWWLWW. We win two and lose one. If the pattern were to stay true we lose to Missouri and then we win at Kansas and at Tennessee. Hopefully we will break that pattern.
My comment was that there was less than 1% chance of Kentucky losing to Missouri AND beating Kansas in back to back games, if you use the projections listed on the link I posted. It gives Missouri a 4.1% chance of beating UK and it gives UK a 21.8% chance of beating Kansas.LOL at everyone Taking my 50% chance of winning seriously! I guess some sarcastic humor is a little to much right now. Obviously I over simplified the equation... (that was the humorous part). In theory every team has a 50% chance at winning because there are two teams on the court but other factors push the odds in one favor or the other. I thought everyone knew that. My quip was just that the odds of us winning in Lawrence were better than "Exactly 1%" as another poster said. No biggie though, my since of humor isn't for everyone...
My comment was that there was less than 1% chance of Kentucky losing to Missouri AND beating Kansas in back to back games, if you use the projections listed on the link I posted. It gives Missouri a 4.1% chance of beating UK and it gives UK a 21.8% chance of beating Kansas.
4.1% x 21.8% =0.89% (less than 1%)
No problem my friend.Touche
I misunderstood your statement. My apologies